>“I have come up with some sample tweets I would be delighted to post such as: ‘Omg just saw someone from the good law project kick a toddler in the neck! #BADlawprojectmorelike #neckkick’”
>
>“I have written 600 other potential tweets but will only release them on payment. One involves me calling Erin Brockovich ‘a fucking melt’.
>
>“I look forward to hearing from you.”
lmao. that’s very good
Lycett is brilliant at these sort of things. However, there is a campaign to attack the truth with strong links to the current government. That’s surely the worry here
[deleted]
That’s the worst fucking website I’ve ever clicked on.
The GLP are fucking awful, to be fair. Their model is to solicit donations from well-meaning people, and then spaff them up the wall on baseless legal challenges that inevitably fail. At best one could argue that their performative failure is meant to expose shortcomings in UK law, but that’s not how they communicate their role to donors. It’s disgusting.
Who the fuck is Joe Lycett and why would I or anyone else care?
The fact that you have tech firms looking for influencers to attack the Good Law Project should ring alarm bells.
What was the deal with the sewage in the Albert docks? Was it a bit that was exposed before the papers picked it up and ruined the reveal?
10 comments
What the fuck is this shit?
[removed]
>“I have come up with some sample tweets I would be delighted to post such as: ‘Omg just saw someone from the good law project kick a toddler in the neck! #BADlawprojectmorelike #neckkick’”
>
>“I have written 600 other potential tweets but will only release them on payment. One involves me calling Erin Brockovich ‘a fucking melt’.
>
>“I look forward to hearing from you.”
lmao. that’s very good
Lycett is brilliant at these sort of things. However, there is a campaign to attack the truth with strong links to the current government. That’s surely the worry here
[deleted]
That’s the worst fucking website I’ve ever clicked on.
The GLP are fucking awful, to be fair. Their model is to solicit donations from well-meaning people, and then spaff them up the wall on baseless legal challenges that inevitably fail. At best one could argue that their performative failure is meant to expose shortcomings in UK law, but that’s not how they communicate their role to donors. It’s disgusting.
Who the fuck is Joe Lycett and why would I or anyone else care?
The fact that you have tech firms looking for influencers to attack the Good Law Project should ring alarm bells.
What was the deal with the sewage in the Albert docks? Was it a bit that was exposed before the papers picked it up and ruined the reveal?