1.3% support for the gammony brexit bring back imperial units. Absolutely brilliant!
Why do the old want to go back to the past when the future is being handled by the young
Thank fuck.
Only reason they wanted this was to make us seem more non-european from the brexiteers down south.
No point copying America’s notion of using an outdated measuring system (which is determined by the metric system) that has a higher user error rate out of blind nationalism.
rejoice rejoice. Brexit dividends just keep coming. We have exercised our sovereignty by answering a consultation on – KGs. Meanwhile the government waters down environmental protections and right to protest but you better not question that plebes!
I remember completing this survey. Not once did the haunted pencil ask if the respondents were in favour of their idiotic proposals. That’s why the summary has had to group the responses thematically.
I would love to see the wording frustrated respondents used to ensure their views were understood.
The truth is, that this would not have qualified as a consultation and would have left any legal changes open to judicial review. That’s probably the number one reason they aren’t heading us right back to the fifties.
I am off for a pint to celebrate.
5 comments
1.3% support for the gammony brexit bring back imperial units. Absolutely brilliant!
Why do the old want to go back to the past when the future is being handled by the young
Thank fuck.
Only reason they wanted this was to make us seem more non-european from the brexiteers down south.
No point copying America’s notion of using an outdated measuring system (which is determined by the metric system) that has a higher user error rate out of blind nationalism.
rejoice rejoice. Brexit dividends just keep coming. We have exercised our sovereignty by answering a consultation on – KGs. Meanwhile the government waters down environmental protections and right to protest but you better not question that plebes!
I remember completing this survey. Not once did the haunted pencil ask if the respondents were in favour of their idiotic proposals. That’s why the summary has had to group the responses thematically.
I would love to see the wording frustrated respondents used to ensure their views were understood.
The truth is, that this would not have qualified as a consultation and would have left any legal changes open to judicial review. That’s probably the number one reason they aren’t heading us right back to the fifties.
I am off for a pint to celebrate.