The NYT is covering Belgorod on its front page. The photo features people carrying a victim. Astonishingly, that photo is of Ukrainian victims in Zaporizhzhia — not Belgorod.

17 comments

1. NYT: A rag with an alibi.

2. Email NYT pointing this travesti, and demand a public appology for misleading the public and to Ukrainian people.

3. The NY Times is showing whose side they are on.

4. Yea, when the story got posted here, I noticed they didn’t say which authorities did the claiming. Or even throwing an alleged.

5. Fucking gross

6. Our American tabloid junk

7. But it says under the picture that these are victims of russian attack. Seriously posting shit like that only helps Russia and Trump Maga crowd.

   Ppl criticizing probably never held a newspaper in their hands ever, nor do they understand the basics of reporting.

   And btw NYT deserves criticism but this is not it.

8. The NYT has become a huge embarrassment.

9. “Astonishingly?” Were we supposed to expect the NYT to report the truth, in an accurate manner? Sorry, but I’m not astonished. I’m not even surprised.

10. Putin pays good money for that content !

11. Things like this are the reason I no longer click on a NYTimes link. Either misinformation or outright Russian Propaganda more often than not.

12. NYT is 💩

    They lost their way and now are even suing OpenAi

    Didn’t they recently have an opinion that Ukraine should sacrifice 20% of its territory? Fuck them

    And on Israel they just take Hamas’s words as trut. It took them 3 months to admit that Hamas raped woman on October 7th

13. The NY Times has an agenda. It’s one driven habits corporate owners.

14. they changed that picture quick

15. Nyt is garbage

16. I call it the New York Slimes.

    It just slimes people and countries – Spews hate.

17. Maybe they are confused were Belgorod is? Ya right…