https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/loyalist-activist-reports-sdlp-leader-to-parliamentary-standards-watchdog/a41152342.html

SDLP leader Colum Eastwood has been reported to Parliament’s standards watchdog after he said he would not take part in a criminal investigation into an alleged unnotified parade involving the Bloody Sunday families.

The complaint has been raised by loyalist activist Jamie Bryson who accused Mr Eastwood of seeking to “place himself above the law”.

But the SDLP leader told the PA news agency that nothing would stop him standing with the Bloody Sunday families in their campaign for justice.

Last month, Mr Eastwood, the MP for Foyle, walked out of Strand Road police station in Londonderry after being asked to attend an interview under caution.

Police are investigating a complaint made by Mr Bryson in relation to an event on August 25, which saw members of the Bloody Sunday families walking together to Bishop Street Courthouse in Londonderry for a hearing in relation to the prosecution of Soldier F.

At issue in the investigation is whether the August event fell under legislation in Northern Ireland that requires organisers of public processions to give advance notice to the Parades Commission. It is an offence to organise or participate in an unnotified parade or related protest.

Mr Eastwood said he had attended the PSNI station last month to inform officers that no Bloody Sunday families would be taking part in the investigation.

He said he waited for 20 minutes but had not been interviewed and branded the situation a “total and utter farce”, adding that he would not be partaking in the investigation any further.

At the time, the SDLP leader said if the police wanted to arrest him, they knew his address.

Mr Bryson confirmed he had now complained to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Daniel Greenberg.

He said: “Mr Eastwood has sought to place himself above the law, and it could be argued has interfered to an impermissible level in an ongoing criminal investigation, in which he is himself a self-identified suspect.

(Mr Eastwood’s) case appears to be that because the cause for which he marched was legitimate, that the law ought not to apply to him and his fellow marchers. That is a bizarre proposition
Jamie Bryson

“Parading law has been rigorously applied to the unionist and loyalist community; indeed I was held in prison in 2013 for precisely the same offence as that alleged against Mr Eastwood.

“Therefore, equality under the law requires that the same rigour is applied to all citizens.

“There is no exemption in the law for those who self-perceive themselves as having a legitimate cause, the only exemptions are funerals and the Salvation Army, neither of which avails Mr Eastwood.

“His case appears to be that because the cause for which he marched was legitimate, that the law ought not to apply to him and his fellow marchers. That is a bizarre proposition.”

I’ve been clear that there is nothing that will ever stop me from standing with the Bloody Sunday families in their campaign for justice
Colum Eastwood MP

Mr Bryson added: “This is not, and has never been, about the Bloody Sunday families who are entitled to pursue what they see as justice through the prism of their view of contentious legacy matters.

“The criminal complaint is about the equal application of the law.”

Mr Bryson said he believed the SDLP leader was in breach of the House of Commons code of conduct.

Mr Eastwood responded: “I’ve been clear that there is nothing that will ever stop me from standing with the Bloody Sunday families in their campaign for justice.

“These are people who had their loved ones murdered, their names blackened and justice denied for more than 50 years.

“They have, and will always have, my full support.”

Mr Eastwood said he was not surprised by the complaint, adding “everybody can see this for what it is”.

The MP’s lawyer had previously said that police were looking to speak to a number of relatives of Bloody Sunday victims after they walked to the court last year.

Soldier F, a former paratrooper who cannot be identified, is accused of murdering James Wray and William McKinney when members of the Parachute Regiment shot dead 13 civil rights protesters on the streets of Derry in 1972 in an event known as Bloody Sunday.

He is also charged with five attempted murders.

Regarded as one of the darkest days of the Troubles, 13 people were killed on Bloody Sunday and another man shot by paratroopers died four months later.

Many consider him the 14th victim of Bloody Sunday but his death was formally attributed to an inoperable brain tumour.

by Ah_here_like

18 comments
  1. A complaint about something he only seen on the news. Bryson really doesn’t have a leg to stand on. Whining little fuck.

  2. Ohh this is a mixed bag of fuckery for me.

    No one is above the law. Simple. I agree the principle that any MP who thinks he can turn up at a police station, expect to be seen immediately and to say that him or anyone else is going just not play is abhorrent.

    But….. I don’t think the Bloody Sunday families should be considered to have had a parade. It was a such a short distance that for me it’s a waste of time doing anything other than maybe asking that if in future they would fire in a wee application.

    And …… Jamie fucking Bryson has a cheek to talk about parades abuse or trying to believe he is above the law. If he understood irony he would be embarrassed externally.

  3. Binlid lad is merely seeking publicity, so let’s not give the wee Amadán any

  4. ‘“Parading law has been rigorously applied to the unionist and loyalist community’

    Except when Jamie’s UVF mates marched to court with their faces concealed a few months ago their associates in the PSNI rigorously did sweet FA to stop that illegal parade

  5. >Mr Eastwood has sought to place himself above the law, and it could be argued has interfered to an impermissible level in an ongoing criminal investigation, in which he is himself a self-identified suspect

    No you fuckwit. He hasn’t interfered in anything. He has said he won’t cooperate with an investigation which is absolutely 100% his legal right to do so. (1st year law student would know that one)

    In any event did he not present himself to Strand Rd station on an agreed date to be interviewed and no-one appeared to actually interview him?

    According to Mr Brysons logic the PSNI officer who failed to appear to conduct the interview has also arguably interfered to an impermissible level in an ongoing criminal investigation.

  6. What did Mickey Mouse get for Christmas? A Jamie Bryson watch.

  7. Always surprises me when Bryson does stuff like this, surely he knows that he won’t be ‘above the law’ in the near future.. clocks ticking.

  8. bryson touting again no wonder he is barred from the shankill road

  9. In Bryson’s defence, he likely thought he was complaining to the paramilitary commissioner not parliamentary.

Leave a Reply