Watching a video on finances and this came up – does anyone know if it is accurate and true? apparently from Oxfam report

by jonto81

9 comments
  1. Can’t imagine there’s a country on earth where this isn’t true

  2. Allegedly, one of the walmart heirs is the lad who flies a spitfire all over the peninsula every time there’s a clear sky.

    I can’t imagine what the cost of that is, but every time I hear the engine I’m annoyed.

  3. In America it’s the 3 richest – I honestly wouldn’t have thought there were that many “mega rich” here

  4. That’s pretty shitty phrasing. I would imagine the two wealthiest people in the country would have more money than all of the poorest, not just 50%.

  5. It’s always been like that throughout the history of humanity and I don’t think it’s likely to change anytime in the future either

  6. Wealth disparity figures often look quite shocking because the poorest don’t have wealth (i.e. savings or property). It’s literally 0 (if not negative if you account for debt) for the poorest segment of society). I probably have more “wealth” than a fair % of the poorest combined, just by having some savings. However, my wealth was 0 or negative until I was working for a couplr years after college.

    Ireland has done a really good job at improving income inequality as it got wealthier – it’s one of only a small group of western countries where income inequality dropped over the last few decades. However, wealth inequality is a big and growing issue, largely because of housing issues. However, a lot of people, and not just the super wealthy, seem opposed to measures that specifically target wealth inequality, like higher inheritance taxes, property taxes etc.

  7. I don’t think it is a good measure for example in this case a student with no mortgage is richer than me even though I have a higher than median income. Mortgage is an investment though in an asset that will hold its value.

  8. How many people are considered the ‘poorest’?

Leave a Reply