This is the same club whose oil owners got their money by using slaves who died or suffered severe damages to get their owners rich after all.
Weird, cos I can join and create an account and then presumably start gambling.
The whole thing about being based in IOM.
It’s not a nice practice but it’s standard for most betting companies, i’ve noticed some are in Gibraltar.
Especially when gambling ad’s aren’t just for UK viewers, they’re for international viewers too.
This isn’t a City thing.
The lawyer on twitter specialising in gambling law, says their betting partner is “illegal” I guess Arsenal have to be given the title immediately. Or 115 should become 116.
But before that ..
Just to check (as I don’t have twitter/X) the person making the claims of “illegal” betting partners, is a lawyer specialising in that field, right? He’s not like one of those crazy twitter users that became epidemiologists overnight during the pandemic and expected to be taken seriously or anything like that?
Just getting funny at this point.
Is that what was showing at the game or one of the broadcasting changes where it’s shown on tv at specific geographical locations?
Ah, the same old “City this” and “City that” chatter again.
Not even a City supporter but I can’t wait for it to be over. Charges have been made, dates have been set (I think.) If they aren’t found guilty, we should move on.
If they are found guilty, then deal out the appropriate punishments – whether it be fines, points deductions, vacating titles or handing the titles to the teams who finished second – and then we should move on.
116 charges now.
An ‘illegal’ betting partner that is licensed to operate in the UK? How does that work?
The amount of effort Arsenal fans are putting into City is disturbing and pathetic honestly…
We didn’t see this much town crying from Liverpool when they lost to City for several years
116? Hopefully not it’ll take 10 billion years for a resolution
10 comments
This is the same club whose oil owners got their money by using slaves who died or suffered severe damages to get their owners rich after all.
Weird, cos I can join and create an account and then presumably start gambling.
The whole thing about being based in IOM.
It’s not a nice practice but it’s standard for most betting companies, i’ve noticed some are in Gibraltar.
Especially when gambling ad’s aren’t just for UK viewers, they’re for international viewers too.
This isn’t a City thing.
The lawyer on twitter specialising in gambling law, says their betting partner is “illegal” I guess Arsenal have to be given the title immediately. Or 115 should become 116.
But before that ..
Just to check (as I don’t have twitter/X) the person making the claims of “illegal” betting partners, is a lawyer specialising in that field, right? He’s not like one of those crazy twitter users that became epidemiologists overnight during the pandemic and expected to be taken seriously or anything like that?
Just getting funny at this point.
Is that what was showing at the game or one of the broadcasting changes where it’s shown on tv at specific geographical locations?
Ah, the same old “City this” and “City that” chatter again.
Not even a City supporter but I can’t wait for it to be over. Charges have been made, dates have been set (I think.) If they aren’t found guilty, we should move on.
If they are found guilty, then deal out the appropriate punishments – whether it be fines, points deductions, vacating titles or handing the titles to the teams who finished second – and then we should move on.
116 charges now.
An ‘illegal’ betting partner that is licensed to operate in the UK? How does that work?
The amount of effort Arsenal fans are putting into City is disturbing and pathetic honestly…
We didn’t see this much town crying from Liverpool when they lost to City for several years
116? Hopefully not it’ll take 10 billion years for a resolution