Sunak: RAF strikes on Houthi targets ‘self-defence’
last night the RAF successfully conducted a fifth set of strikes against hooti military Targets in Yemen alongside the US these strikes were conducted to further degrade the military capabilities of the hooes and to prevent further attacks on international shipping the strikes were taken in self-defense uh in the face of an ongoing threat that the hoo’s post we’ve always said that we will not hesitate and I will not hesitate to protect British interests abroad and at home there is an ongoing threat that the hooes pose 197 attacks since November all our intelligence indicates that previous sets of strikes have been successful in degrading military capabilities of the hooes targeting Supply Commander control and launch sites for drones and missiles and there is also a risk in inaction that would damage the global economy and further risk our International Security
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak says RAF strikes against Houthis in Yemen were conducted in the interest of ‘self-defence’ to reduce their military capabilities.
Conducted alongside the US, it is the fifth time the RAF has taken part in strikes against the Houthis.
(Subscribe: https://bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
——-
Get more news at our site – https://www.channel4.com/news/
Follow us:
Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/Channel4News/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/Channel4News
TikTok – https://www.tiktok.com/@c4news
Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/channel4news/
29 comments
Everyone knows that the on notice PM is full of rubbish and will soon be back living in the USA to avoid an ICC trial.
What a shameful joke of a man !
His eyes 😵💫
So adding fuel to the fire is the solution, instead of stopping the cause of it??
Uk has its own problems we need to stay out of it
### The Conservative and Labour Cycle in UK Politics: An Analysis
In the United Kingdom, a recurring political pattern often emerges where Conservative governments implement policies that, critics argue, favor the wealthy and increase economic inequality, leading to public dissatisfaction. Labour governments frequently succeed them, aiming to address these disparities. However, after economic recovery under Labour, Conservatives often regain power with promises that critics claim are misleading. This cyclical pattern can be examined through historical and economic lenses.
#### Conservative Governments: Policies and Economic Impact
1. **Tax Policies and Public Spending**:
– **Tax Increases**: Despite promises of tax cuts, Conservative governments have a history of raising taxes indirectly through measures such as increased VAT (Value Added Tax) and reduced public spending, which can lead to higher costs for public services【25†source】 .
– **Austerity Measures**: The Conservative-led coalition government (2010-2015) introduced austerity measures aimed at reducing the deficit. These policies included significant cuts to public services and welfare, disproportionately affecting low-income individuals while protecting wealthier citizens from direct tax hikes .
2. **Economic Inequality**:
– **Wealth Concentration**: Conservative policies have often been criticized for favoring the wealthy. Tax breaks for the rich and corporations, combined with cuts to social programs, have contributed to increasing economic inequality .
– **Housing Crisis**: The lack of investment in affordable housing has also been a significant issue, with housing policies under Conservative governments often favoring property owners and investors over renters and first-time buyers .
#### Labour Governments: Reforms and Economic Stabilization
1. **Economic Recovery and Social Policies**:
– **Investment in Public Services**: Labour governments typically prioritize public service investment, aiming to improve healthcare, education, and social welfare. These investments often stimulate economic growth and reduce inequality .
– **Progressive Taxation**: Labour's tax policies are generally more progressive, aiming to redistribute wealth through higher taxes on the rich and increased public spending on social programs .
2. **Economic Management**:
– **Economic Stability**: Historical periods of Labour governance, such as under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have seen efforts to stabilize the economy and manage public finances responsibly. The aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis saw significant government intervention to rescue the banking sector and stimulate economic recovery .
– **Welfare Reforms**: Labour has often implemented reforms aimed at reducing poverty and supporting vulnerable populations, countering the effects of Conservative austerity measures .
#### Political Dynamics and Public Perception
1. **Conservative Promises and Public Trust**:
– **Election Campaigns**: Conservatives often regain power by capitalizing on economic improvements achieved under Labour, promising further tax cuts and economic growth. Critics argue that these promises frequently prove to be misleading, with actual policies benefiting the wealthy rather than the broader population .
– **Media Influence**: The role of media in shaping public perception cannot be overlooked. Conservative-aligned media often portrays Labour's economic management negatively, contributing to swings in public opinion and electoral outcomes .
2. **Labour's Challenges**:
– **Economic Legacy**: When Labour inherits an economy strained by Conservative policies, their initial focus on recovery and social spending can lead to short-term financial strain, which Conservatives later use to criticize Labour's economic management .
– **Political Instability**: Internal party divisions and changing leadership can also affect Labour's ability to maintain long-term governance and implement sustained economic policies .
### Conclusion
The cyclical nature of UK politics, where Conservative and Labour governments alternate power, reflects deep-seated ideological differences and economic strategies. Conservatives often implement policies favoring economic liberalization and reduced public spending, while Labour prioritizes social equity and public investment. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for voters and policymakers aiming to navigate and address the underlying causes of economic inequality and public dissatisfaction in the UK.
眉毛を綺麗に整えているわ。
Coercive Diplomacy: When countries resist U.S. policies or actions, economic sanctions are frequently used as a tool of coercion. These sanctions can cripple economies, forcing governments to comply with U.S. demands Hypocrisy of the West in International Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis of Ukraine and Palestine
In the realm of international politics, the actions of Western nations often reveal a striking disparity in their responses to conflicts around the world. Two prominent examples that highlight this inconsistency are the West's reactions to the conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine.
#### Ukraine: A Unified Front Against Aggression
When Russia launched its military assault on Ukraine in February 2022, Western countries swiftly condemned the invasion. The United States and its European allies took decisive action:
– **Condemnation and Sanctions**: They universally denounced Russia's aggression, imposing stringent economic sanctions aimed at crippling the Russian economy.
– **Military Support**: Western nations provided substantial military aid to Ukraine, including advanced weaponry and intelligence support. This assistance was crucial in helping Ukraine defend itself against the Russian onslaught.
– **Humanitarian Aid**: Billions of dollars in humanitarian aid were funneled into Ukraine to support the war-torn population. This aid included medical supplies, food, and financial assistance to ensure the welfare of Ukrainian civilians.
– **Refugee Acceptance**: European countries and the U.S. opened their doors to Ukrainian refugees, offering them asylum and support as they fled the conflict. This show of solidarity was both swift and generous.
#### Palestine: Support for the Oppressor
In stark contrast, the response of Western countries to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly during periods of heightened violence, reveals a deep-seated bias:
– **Unwavering Support for Israel**: Despite numerous reports of human rights violations and disproportionate use of force by Israel, Western nations, particularly the United States, continue to offer unwavering support to Israel. This support often comes in the form of diplomatic backing in international forums and vetoing resolutions critical of Israel in the United Nations.
– **Military Aid**: The U.S. provides Israel with billions of dollars in military aid annually, ensuring it remains the most powerful military force in the region. This aid includes advanced weaponry that has been used in operations resulting in significant Palestinian civilian casualties.
– **Limited Humanitarian Response**: Unlike their response to the Ukrainian crisis, Western nations have provided limited humanitarian aid to Palestinians. The blockade of Gaza and restrictions on movement exacerbate the humanitarian crisis, yet Western intervention to alleviate these conditions has been minimal.
– **Refugee Neglect**: Palestinian refugees, displaced by decades of conflict, receive far less support. Western nations have not shown the same level of willingness to accept Palestinian refugees or provide them with the necessary aid and support.
#### A Double Standard in Foreign Policy
This stark contrast in responses highlights a profound hypocrisy in Western foreign policy:
– **Moral High Ground**: In the case of Ukraine, Western nations position themselves as defenders of international law, human rights, and national sovereignty. Yet, in Palestine, these same principles are overshadowed by strategic alliances and geopolitical interests.
– **Selective Humanitarianism**: The outpouring of aid and support for Ukraine contrasts sharply with the muted and often complicit stance toward the suffering of Palestinians. This selective humanitarianism undermines the credibility of Western nations as impartial advocates for global justice.
– **Geopolitical Interests**: The underlying factor driving this hypocrisy is often geopolitical interest. Ukraine's struggle against Russian aggression aligns with Western interests in countering Russian influence. Conversely, unwavering support for Israel ensures the West's strategic foothold in the Middle East.
#### Conclusion
The inconsistent responses of Western nations to the conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine expose a glaring double standard. While championing human rights and international law in one instance, they appear complicit in oppression and suffering in another. This hypocrisy not only tarnishes the moral authority of Western countries but also perpetuates global injustices. For a truly just and equitable international order, it is imperative that Western nations apply their principles consistently, irrespective of geopolitical interests.
why is this man still on power? he is just a puppet and you guys put him on power? with that many people on #UK but still no one realize it???
Clown
All that private education can't mask the sheer idiocy or moral bankruptcy of what he's saying.
Why?! How dare they! Its not "international waters"!! The Houthis are the only ones defending international law that is being violated by Israel and its allies, and they havent killed people theyve seized assets…..
And who r u now??!? 😂😅😂
Attacks on International shipping. What about UN schools hospitals safe zones
Zionists must be stopped at all costs
The puppet of Rothschild's….
People are struggling for food and wasting money for no reason
Cowards
When an idiot becomes PM of a nation
You used AI for this analysis.
Britain defends Israel in the Red Sea leaving Israeli troops free to commit war crimes against Palestinian men, women and children in Gaza – weapons supplied by Britain.
The face of britain
SHAME ON YOU RISHI!!! Houthi is PROTESTING FOR PALESTINIANS GENOCIDE BY I$RAEL and here you are playing EVIL VILLAIN wanting to stop them, GLOBAL ECONOMY ARE FINE WITHOUT YOU AND USA!!!
"Vengeance is mine saith the Lord our God"
He knows all truths.
Remember… Everything we do is being put in a record to be used against us in the future. Please don't swap evil for evil. That's what they want.
Houtis are simply medieval barbarians.
Stupid
Another "self defense" excuse
And we were born yesterday, weren't we?
"Commerce before g3no cid3"
That's pu ssy sunak
Viva Huthi ❤
Selling mre weapons to push up gdp.