GDP by US State/Canadian province, 2023 (in US Dollars) [OC] Posted by Smacpats111111 Tags:DataData Is BeautifulDataIsBeautiful 5 comments Created with mapchart.net Sources: https://apps.bea.gov/histdatacore/HistFileDetails.html?HistCateID=1&FileGroupID=289 https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=3610022101 I didn’t realize how, outside of Ontario, the rest of the Canadian provinces really are not even close to economic power houses The second highest tier for Canada lumps them in with Missouri and Louisiana off all places. Just crazy to me. California should have its own color, GDP for 2024 is projected to be over 4 trillion (TX is second with 2.7, for reference). It seems to me that most of the red states aren’t pulling their weight. That legend threw me for a loop. Why go from lowest on top to highest on the bottom vertically? Comments are closed.
Created with mapchart.net Sources: https://apps.bea.gov/histdatacore/HistFileDetails.html?HistCateID=1&FileGroupID=289 https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=3610022101
I didn’t realize how, outside of Ontario, the rest of the Canadian provinces really are not even close to economic power houses The second highest tier for Canada lumps them in with Missouri and Louisiana off all places. Just crazy to me.
California should have its own color, GDP for 2024 is projected to be over 4 trillion (TX is second with 2.7, for reference).
5 comments
Created with mapchart.net
Sources:
https://apps.bea.gov/histdatacore/HistFileDetails.html?HistCateID=1&FileGroupID=289
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=3610022101
I didn’t realize how, outside of Ontario, the rest of the Canadian provinces really are not even close to economic power houses
The second highest tier for Canada lumps them in with Missouri and Louisiana off all places. Just crazy to me.
California should have its own color, GDP for 2024 is projected to be over 4 trillion (TX is second with 2.7, for reference).
It seems to me that most of the red states aren’t pulling their weight.
That legend threw me for a loop. Why go from lowest on top to highest on the bottom vertically?
Comments are closed.