You gained and lost a lot between august and December of 2021!
What’s the X-Axis scale? O.o
Looks like a liquidity sweep. I’d expect to see it take out ATH during this next bull cycle. But wait for reversal signals before going long.
TP around 280
Ha! Mine’s nearly identical. Went from 180 to 225 during the first 20 years, but have now gotten serious and dropped from 225 to 165 (and stayed there the past 2years) during the last 5.
> most elevations are pregnancy.
While I do understand that “most” means “not all,” how many times were you actually pregnant during this three-year-and-change span?
Looks like a stock chart to me going to buy the dip lol
Missed the pregnancy note and thought the sudden 50lb gain was really concerning.
Why is the graph in italics.
I thought this was a male chart.
> most elevations are pregnancy.
240lbs as a pregnant lady? Is that not a lot?
Granted there’s a kid in there but that’s strikes me as a lot of weight for a woman. I’m asking because I do not know what’s normal.
While this is indeed data, it’s far from beautiful.
1. The x-axis is awful. There are only 3 labels for what appears to be around 6 years, but on first glance I assumed you gained 50lbs in like 2 months.
2. The data seems very inconsistent. Weight is tracked sparsely during gain and very frequently during loss.
3. It’s not appealing to look at. Sure, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this is literally just a line.
4. Without context this is incredibly confusing. Even with the context that some of these weight gains are from pregnancy, that’s not all of them. There should be labels in the data to show events.
Mods, lock her up in data-but-it’s-not-beautiful jail.
12 comments
You gained and lost a lot between august and December of 2021!
What’s the X-Axis scale? O.o
Looks like a liquidity sweep. I’d expect to see it take out ATH during this next bull cycle. But wait for reversal signals before going long.
TP around 280
Ha! Mine’s nearly identical. Went from 180 to 225 during the first 20 years, but have now gotten serious and dropped from 225 to 165 (and stayed there the past 2years) during the last 5.
> most elevations are pregnancy.
While I do understand that “most” means “not all,” how many times were you actually pregnant during this three-year-and-change span?
Looks like a stock chart to me going to buy the dip lol
Missed the pregnancy note and thought the sudden 50lb gain was really concerning.
Why is the graph in italics.
I thought this was a male chart.
> most elevations are pregnancy.
240lbs as a pregnant lady? Is that not a lot?
Granted there’s a kid in there but that’s strikes me as a lot of weight for a woman. I’m asking because I do not know what’s normal.
While this is indeed data, it’s far from beautiful.
1. The x-axis is awful. There are only 3 labels for what appears to be around 6 years, but on first glance I assumed you gained 50lbs in like 2 months.
2. The data seems very inconsistent. Weight is tracked sparsely during gain and very frequently during loss.
3. It’s not appealing to look at. Sure, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this is literally just a line.
4. Without context this is incredibly confusing. Even with the context that some of these weight gains are from pregnancy, that’s not all of them. There should be labels in the data to show events.
Mods, lock her up in data-but-it’s-not-beautiful jail.
The x-axis scale is highly nonlinear.
Comments are closed.