Woman from Caernarfon in court for aggressively farting at her boyfriend’s ex

by Toaster161

17 comments
  1. It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).

    Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://metro.co.uk/2025/01/29/woman-charged-inappropriate-videos-uks-first-cyber-farting-case-22459049/](https://metro.co.uk/2025/01/29/woman-charged-inappropriate-videos-uks-first-cyber-farting-case-22459049/)**

    *****

    ^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)

  2. I love how this is wasting everyone’s time: police, court, hers and mine reading this article. 

  3. Drove past the courthouse yesterday and saw a photographer setting up his camera and tripod, little did I know it’d be for such a monumental case.

  4. Some of the comments from the “victim” of feeling distress and anxiety, and not feeling safe in their own home is absolutely pathetic!

  5. > There are some issues going on between Miss Evans’s partner and his ex-partner (Ms Prytherech)

    Ms Prytherech? More like Prytherecht!

    //

    But on a more serious note, this seems like a *bog* standard case of harassment. Meaning, repeated unwanted or malicious contact.

    Monty Python-esque as it is – its more the sending of *any* message beyond the line of *they clearly don’t want to talk to you* is technically illegal.

  6. “Police got wind of what had happened and they followed through by arresting her and hauling her before the courts in Caernarfon.”

    😆

  7. I can’t imagine a single video or even a short series of videos wouldn’t feel solid enough to hinge this sort of case on. I would expect there is a history in the background between the two women that meant this was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Sadly, the article only mentions the dispute over child custody and not past actions between the two.

    All I know is the case smells funny – there’s got to be more to the story than we get to see.

  8. *15 rehabilitation sessions for her sphincter whistles*

    Can anyone register for that course of rehab?

Comments are closed.