Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009).
Aldrich, H. & Herker, D. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2, 217 (1977).
Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19, 387–420 (1989).
Guston, D. H. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 26, 399–408 (2001).
O’Mahony, S. & Bechky, B. A. Boundary organizations: enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Adm. Sci. Q. 53, 422–459 (2008).
Leifer, R. & Delbecq, A. Organizational/environmental interchange: a model of boundary spanning activity. Acad. Manage. Rev. 3, 40 (1978).
Sandmann, L. R., Jordan, J. W., Mull, C. D. & Valentine, T. Measuring boundary-spanning behaviors in community engagement. J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem. 18, 83 (2014).
Weerts, D. J. & Sandmann, L. R. Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. J. High. Educ. 81, 632–657 (2010).
Wegemer, C. M. & Renick, J. Boundary spanning roles and power in educational partnerships. AERA Open 7, 233285842110168 (2021).
Bednarek, A. T., Shouse, B., Hudson, C. G. & Goldburg, R. Science-policy intermediaries from a practitioner’s perspective: The Lenfest Ocean Program experience. Sci. Public Policy 43, 291–300 (2016).
Safford, H. D., Sawyer, S. C., Kocher, S. D., Hiers, J. K. & Cross, M. Linking knowledge to action: the role of boundary spanners in translating ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 560–568 (2017).
Goodrich, K. A. et al. Who are boundary spanners and how can we support them in making knowledge more actionable in sustainability fields? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 42, 45–51 (2020).
Satterthwaite, E. et al. Centering knowledge co-production in sustainability science: why, how, and when. Oceanography 37, 26–37 (2024).
Sarkki, S. et al. How boundary objects help to perform roles of science arbiter, honest broker, and issue advocate. Sci. Public Policy 47, 161–171 (2020).
Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B. & Leeuwis, C. New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Sci. Public Policy 40, 354–365 (2013).
MacKillop, E., Connell, A., Downe, J. & Durrant, H. Making sense of knowledge-brokering organisations: boundary organisations or policy entrepreneurs? Sci. Public Policy 50, 950–960 (2023).
Roche, J. et al. Citizen science, education, and learning: challenges and opportunities. Front. Sociol. 5, 613814 (2020).
Fraisl, D. et al. Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences. Nat. Rev. Methods Primer 2, 64 (2022).
Kelly, R., Fleming, A., Pecl, G. T., von Gönner, J. & Bonn, A. Citizen science and marine conservation: a global review. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190461 (2020).
Tengö, M., Austin, B. J., Danielsen, F. & Fernández-Llamazares, Á. Creating synergies between citizen science and indigenous and local knowledge. BioScience 71, 503–518 (2021).
Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N. & Louder, E. The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 42, 15–21 (2020).
Cohn, J. P. Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience 58, 192–197 (2008).
Escobar-Briones, E. & Álvarez-Sánchez, L. F. Citizen Science for Deep Ocean Biodiversity: A Crowdsourcing Tool in Support of Conservation. in Mexican Fauna in the Anthropocene (eds. Jones, R. W., Ornelas-García, C. P., Pineda-López, R. & Álvarez, F.) 581–593 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17277-9_27.
Finger, L. et al. The science of citizen science: a systematic literature review on educational and scientific outcomes. Front. Educ. 8, 1226529 (2023).
Pateman, R., Dyke, A. & West, S. The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract. 6, 9 (2021).
Vasiliades, M. A. et al. A systematic literature review on the participation aspects of environmental and nature-based citizen science initiatives. Sustainability 13, 7457 (2021).
Ellwood, E. R. et al. Citizen science needs a name change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, S0169534723000575 (2023).
Ardoin, N., O’Connor, R. & Bowers, A. 9. Exploring how place connections support sustainability solutions in marine socio-ecological systems. in Navigating Our Way to Solutions in Marine Conservation (ed. Crowder, L. B.) 143–154 (Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, UK, 2025).
Collins, H. M. & Evans, R. Rethinking Expertise. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007).
Gutiérrez, N. L., Hilborn, R. & Defeo, O. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470, 386–389 (2011).
Hyder, K., Townhill, B., Anderson, L. G., Delany, J. & Pinnegar, J. K. Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy? Mar. Policy 59, 112–120 (2015).
MacPhail, V. J. & Colla, S. R. Power of the people: A review of citizen science programs for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 249, 108739 (2020).
McKinley, D. C. et al. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biol. Conserv. 208, 15–28 (2017).
O’Connor, R. J., Spalding, A. K., Bowers, A. W. & Ardoin, N. M. Power and participation: A systematic review of marine protected area engagement through participatory science Methods. Mar. Policy 163, 106133 (2024).
Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem. Stud. 14, 575 (1988).
Nightingale, A. A feminist in the forest: situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME: An Int J. Crit. Geogr., 2(1), 77–90 (2015).
Lidskog, R., Standring, A. & White, J. M. Environmental expertise for social transformation: roles and responsibilities for social science. Environ. Sociol. 8, 255–266 (2022).
Murray, G., D’Anna, L. & MacDonald, P. Measuring what we value: The utility of mixed methods approaches for incorporating values into marine social-ecological system management. Mar. Policy 73, 61–68 (2016).
Nature Sustainability Editorial. Make the most of qualitative research. Nat. Sustain. 3, 73–73 (2020).
Norton, B. G. Beyond positivist ecology: toward an integrated ecological ethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics 14, 581–592 (2008).
Southern, D. E., Posselt, J. R., Harris, L., Garza, C. & Parrish, J. K. Boundary spanning leadership in community-centered geoscience research. J. Geosci. Educ. 71, 553–565 (2023).
Oswald, E. Getting to know other ways of knowing: boundary experiences in citizen science. Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract. 5, 25 (2020).
Neset, T.-S. et al. Co-designing a citizen science climate service. Clim. Serv. 24, 100273 (2021).
Mayes, E. C. Citizen science and scientific authority: have you checked the boundary work? Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract. 7, 42 (2022).
Mayes, E. C. Citizen science in news media: boundary mediation of public participation in health expertise. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 49, 211–237 (2024).
Hecker, S. & Taddicken, M. Deconstructing citizen science: a framework on communication and interaction using the concept of roles. J. Sci. Commun. 21, A07 (2022).
Pocock, M. J. O., Hamlin, I., Christelow, J., Passmore, H. & Richardson, M. The benefits of citizen science and nature-noticing activities for well-being, nature connectedness and pro-nature conservation behaviours. People Nat 5, 591–606 (2023).
Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S. & Aarts, N. How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecol. Soc. 15, art26 (2010).
Jørgensen, F. A. & Jørgensen, D. Citizen science for environmental citizenship. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1344–1347 (2021).
Fielding, K. S. & Hornsey, M. J. A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: insights and opportunities. Front. Psychol. 7, 121 (2016).
AbouAssi, K., Makhlouf, N. & Whalen, P. NGOs’ resource capacity antecedents for partnerships. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 26, 435–451 (2016).
Rahman, H. M. T. et al. A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance. Int. J. Commons 11, 823–853 (2017).
Seymour, E., Pannell, D., Roberts, A., Marsh, S. & Wilkinson, R. Decision-making by regional bodies for natural resource management in Australia: current processes and capacity gaps. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 15, 211–221 (2008).
Wheaton, M., Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W. & Kannan, A. Sociocultural learning theories for social-ecological change. Environ. Educ. Res. 1–18 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2347888.
Kloetzer, L. et al. Learning in Citizen Science. in The Science of Citizen Science (eds. Vohland, K. et al.) 283–308 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_15.
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W. & Gaillard, E. A systematic mixed studies review of civic engagement outcomes in environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 29, 1–26 (2023).
Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J. & Stevenson, R. B. Convergence between science and environmental education. Science 344, 583–584 (2014).
Branchini, S. et al. Participating in a citizen science monitoring program: implications for environmental education. PLOS ONE 10, e0131812 (2015).
Dean, A. J., Church, E. K., Loder, J., Fielding, K. S. & Wilson, K. A. How do marine and coastal citizen science experiences foster environmental engagement? J. Environ. Manage. 213, 409–416 (2018).
16 USC 1361-1423h.509. Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. (1972).
Adamou, A., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D. & Hadjichambis, A. Ch. Environmental citizen science initiatives as a springboard towards the education for environmental citizenship: a systematic literature review of empirical research. Sustainability 13, 13692 (2021).
CA Pub Res Code § 30000. California Coastal Act of 1976. 30000 (1976).
Lareau, A. Listening to People: A Practical Guide to Interviewing, Participant Observation, Data Analysis, and Writing It All Up. (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago; London, 2021).
Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. (Sage, London; Thousand Oaks, Calif, 2014).
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (Aldine Publishing Company, 1967).
Saunders, B. et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual. Quant. 52, 1893–1907 (2018).
Smith, J., Jarman, M. & Osborn, M. Doing interpretive phenomenological analysis. Qual. Health Psychol. In (Eds. Murray, M. & Chamberlain K.), Qualitative Health Psychology. Sage 218–240 (1999).
Young, J. C. et al. A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 10–19 (2018).
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo. (2020).
Adobe Inc. Adobe Illustrator. (2019).