Anderson B, Böhmelt T, Ward H (2017) Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe. Environ Res Lett 12:114011
Armingeon K, Bürgisser R (2021) Trade-offs between redistribution and environmental protection: the role of information, ideology, and self-interest. J Eur Public Policy 28:489–509
Atzmüller C, Steiner PM (2010) Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology 6:128–138
Auspurg K, Hinz T (2015) Factorial survey experiments. Quantitative applications in the social sciences, vol 175. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Auspurg K, Hinz T, Liebig S, Sauer C (2015) The factorial survey as a method for measuring sensitive issues. In: Engel U (ed) Improving survey methods: lessons from recent research. European Association of Methodology series. Routledge, New York
Auspurg K, Schmiedeberg C, Bozoyan C, Diekmann A, Thiel F, Best H (2023) Umstieg auf öffentliche Verkehrsmittel und finanzielle Entlastung durch das 9-Euro-Ticket. K Z Soziol Sozialpsychol 75:341–363
Bellani L, Bledow N, Busemeyer MR, Schwerdt G (2021) When everyone thinks they’re middle-class: (mis-) perceptions of inequality and why they matter for social policy. Policy Papers/Cluster of Excellence ‘The Politics of Inequality’ No. 06
Bergquist M, Nilsson A, Harring N, Jagers SC (2022) Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws. Nat Clim Change 12:235–240
Bergquist M, Thiel M, Goldberg MH, van der Linden S (2023) Field interventions for climate change mitigation behaviors: a second-order meta-analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120:e2214851120
Bernard R, Tzamourani P, Weber M (2022) Climate change and individual behavior. Discussion Paper Deutsche Bundesbank. No 01/2022
Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat Clim Change 6:680–683
Bouman T, Verschoor M, Albers CJ, Böhm G, Fisher SD, Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Steg L (2020) When worry about climate change leads to climate action: how values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Glob Environ Change 62:102061
Bradley GL, Babutsidze Z, Chai A, Reser JP (2020) The role of climate change risk perception, response efficacy, and psychological adaptation in pro-environmental behavior: a two nation study. J Environ Psychol 68:101410
Bruderer Enzler H, Diekmann A, Liebe U (2019) Do environmental concern and future orientation predict metered household electricity use? J Environ Psychol 62:22–29
Büchs M, Bahaj AS, Blunden L, Bourikas L, Falkingham J, James P, Kamanda M, Wu Y (2018) Promoting low carbon behaviours through personalised information? Long-term evaluation of a carbon calculator interview. Energy Policy 120:284–293
Climate Watch (2023) Historical GHG emissions. https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions. Accessed 7 Sept 2023
Cook J et al. (2016) Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ Res Lett 11:48002
Dechezleprêtre A, Fabre A, Kruse T, Planterose B, Sanchez Chico A, Stantcheva S (2022) Fighting climate change: international attitudes toward climate policies. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1714
Diekmann A, Preisendörfer P (2003) Green and greenback. Ration Soc 15:441–472
Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18452–18456
Doherty KL, Webler TN (2016) Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the Alarmed segment’s public-sphere climate actions. Nat Clim Change 6:879–884
Doran R, Böhm G, Pfister H-R, Steentjes K, Pidgeon N (2019) Consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change: insights from nationally representative surveys across four European countries. J Risk Res 22:610–626
Fesenfeld LP, Sun Y, Wicki M, Bernauer T (2021) The role and limits of strategic framing for promoting sustainable consumption and policy. Glob Environ Change 68:102266
Franzen A, Meyer R (2004) Klimawandel des Umweltbewusstseins?:/Climate change in environmental attitudes? Z Soziol 33:119–137
Gadenne D, Sharma B, Kerr D, Smith T (2011) The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy 39:7684–7694
Gampfer R (2014) Do individuals care about fairness in burden sharing for climate change mitigation? Evidence from a lab experiment. Clim Change 124:65–77
Gardiner SM (2006) A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environ Values 15:397–413
Giugni M, Grasso M (eds) (2021) Youth and politics in times of increasing inequalities. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Gough I (2013) Carbon mitigation policies, distributional dilemmas and social policies. J Soc Pol 42:191–213
Gravert C, Shreedhar G (2022) Effective carbon taxes need green nudges. Nat Clim Change 12:1073–1074
Graves C, Roelich K (2021) Psychological barriers to pro-environmental behaviour change: a review of meat consumption behaviours. Sustainability 13:11582
Greenwood P (2019) Letter to the Editor on: “The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions” by Wynes and Nicholas, 2017. Ann Geogr Stud 2:29–31
Hallegatte S, Rozenberg J (2017) Climate change through a poverty lens. Nat Clim Change 7:250–256
Hanss D, Böhm G, Doran R, Homburg A (2016) Sustainable consumption of groceries: the importance of believing that one can contribute to sustainable development. Sust Dev 24:357–370
Harrington LJ, Frame DJ, Fischer EM, Hawkins E, Joshi M, Jones CD (2016) Poorest countries experience earlier anthropogenic emergence of daily temperature extremes. Environ Res Lett 11:55007
Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43:6414–6420
Homburg A, Stolberg A (2006) Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. J Environ Psychol 26:1–14
Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Change 6:622–626
Huang H (2016) Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. J Bus Res 69:2206–2212
Huang Y, Warnier M (2019) Bridging the attitude-behaviour gap in household energy consumption. IEEE: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2019.8905660
Ivanova D, Barrett J, Wiedenhofer D, Macura B, Callaghan M, Creutzig F (2020) Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environ Res Lett 15:93001
Jacobs K, Petersen L, Hörisch J, Battenfeld D (2018) Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing. J Clean Prod 203:1155–1169
Jenny MA, Betsch C (2022) Large-scale behavioural data are key to climate policy. Nat Hum Behav 6:1444–1447
Jorgenson AK, Clark B (2011) Societies consuming nature: a panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1960–2003. Soc Sci Res 40:226–244
Keuschnigg M, Kratz F (2017) Thou Shalt recycle: how social norms of environmental protection narrow the scope of the low-cost hypothesis. Environ Behav 50:1059–1091
Klar S, Leeper T, Robison J (2020) Studying identities with experiments: weighing the risk of posttreatment bias against priming effects. J Exp Polit Sci 7:56–60
Knill C (2003) Europäische Umweltpolitik (Governance Ser v.4). VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften GmbH, Wiesbaden
Lacroix K (2018) Comparing the relative mitigation potential of individual pro-environmental behaviors. J Clean Prod 195:1398–1407
Lee Y, Kim S, Kim M, Choi J (2014) Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. J Bus Res 67:2097–2105
Liebe U, Gewinner J, Diekmann A (2021) Large and persistent effects of green energy defaults in the household and business sectors. Nat Hum Behav 5:576–585
Maestre-Andrés S, Drews S, van den Bergh J (2019) Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature. Clim Policy 19:1186–1204
Maki A, Carrico AR, Raimi KT, Truelove HB, Araujo B, Yeung KL (2019) Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nat Sustain 2:307–315
Mayerl J, Best H (2019) Attitudes and behavioral intentions to protect the environment: How consistent is the structure of environmental concern in cross-national comparison? Int J Sociol 49:27–52
Moran D, Wood R, Hertwich E, Mattson K, Rodriguez JFD, Schanes K, Barrett J (2018) Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions. Clim Policy 20:S28–S38
Nielsen KS, Cologna V, Lange F, Brick C, Stern P (2021) The case for impact-focused environmental psychology. J Environ Psychol 74:101559
Nyborg K et al. (2016) Social norms as solutions. Science (New York, NY) 354:42–43
OECD (2013) Effective carbon prices. OECD Publishing, Paris
Ogunbode CA (2022) Climate justice is social justice in the Global South. Nat Hum Behav 6:1443
Otto IM et al. (2020) Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:2354–2365
Oxfam (2020) Confronting carbon inequality: putting climate justice at the heart of the COVID-19 recovery. Oxfam
Pearson AR, Tsai CG, Clayton S (2021) Ethics, morality, and the psychology of climate justice. Curr Opin Psychol 42:36–42
Pickering GJ, Schoen K, Botta M, Fazio X (2020) Exploration of youth knowledge and perceptions of individual-level climate mitigation action. Environ Res Lett 15:104080
Plehwe D (2022) Reluctant transformers or reconsidering opposition to climate change mitigation? German think tanks between environmentalism and neoliberalism. Globalizations 20(8):1–19
Povitkina M, Carlsson Jagers S, Matti S, Martinsson J (2021) Why are carbon taxes unfair? Disentangling public perceptions of fairness. Glob Environ Change 70:102356
Quitzow L, Canzler W, Grundmann P, Leibenath M, Moss T, Rave T (2016) The German Energiewende —what’s happening? Introducing the special issue. Util Policy 41:163–171
Rees JH, Klug S, Bamberg S (2015) Guilty conscience: motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Clim Change 130:439–452
Rockström J, Gaffney O, Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Schellnhuber HJ (2017) A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science (New York, NY) 355:1269–1271
Rüttenauer T (2023) More talk, no action? The link between exposure to extreme weather events, climate change belief and pro-environmental behaviour. Eur Soc 26(4):1–25
Schaffer LM, Oehl B, Bernauer T (2022) Are policymakers responsive to public demand in climate politics? J Pub Pol 42:136–164
Sheagley G, Clifford S (2023) No evidence that measuring moderators alters treatment effects. Am J Political Sci 69(1):49–63
Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M, Arvai J (2016) Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nat Clim Change 6:759–762
Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29:309–317
Taconet N, Méjean A, Guivarch C (2020) Influence of climate change impacts and mitigation costs on inequality between countries. Clim Change 160:15–34
Thiel F (2020) Die low-cost-hypothese. Ein empirischer Test am Beispiel der Befürwortung einer City-Maut. K Z Soziol Sozialpsychol 72:429–453
Tjernström E, Tietenberg T (2008) Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecol Econ 65:315–324
Tobler C, Visschers VH, Siegrist M (2012) Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. J Environ Psychol 32:197–207
Tschötschel R, Schuck A, Schwinges A, Wonneberger A (2021) Climate change policy support, intended behaviour change, and their drivers largely unaffected by consensus messages in Germany. J Environ Psychol 76:101655
Tschötschel R, Schuck A, Wonneberger A (2020) Patterns of controversy and consensus in German, Canadian, and US online news on climate change. Glob Environ Change 60:101957
van de Ven D-J, González-Eguino M, Arto I (2018) The potential of behavioural change for climate change mitigation: a case study for the European Union. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 23:853–886
van Valkengoed AM, Abrahamse W, Steg L (2022) To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour. Nat Hum Behav 6:1482–1492
van Zomeren M, Spears R, Leach CW (2010) Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis. J Environ Psychol 30:339–346
Whitmarsh L, Poortinga W, Capstick S (2021) Behaviour change to address climate change. Curr Opin Psychol 42:76–81
Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2017) The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett 12:74024
Wynes S, Nicholas KA, Zhao J, Donner SD (2018) Measuring what works: quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use. Environ Res Lett 13:113002