That makes sense, the threshold of evidence necessary to criminally charge someone is way higher than it is to fire them.
What good is it to charge them when you know that the case is too weak to even make it to trial.
Just a few hundred bad apples.
Wonder if they’ll use those fancy new face tracking cams to track abusers in the MET?! Oh wait they’d have no staff left if they did that since they’re all compliant grapists….just think of Wayne Couzens….they “jokingly” called him the grapist.
They’re called the filth for a reason
These guy are usually repeat offenders, he’ll find another child or children to offend. One time is too many,
I can’t wait for the usual top minds of /r/policeuk to turn up and tell us all why we’re wrong to castigate this person
Good job he wasn’t rude to someone on FB or they’d have thrown the book at him.
Two Tier Starmer
if the police cant gather enough evidence for THIS then we’re all fucked!
10 comments
” Nothing to see here, move along”.
That makes sense, the threshold of evidence necessary to criminally charge someone is way higher than it is to fire them.
What good is it to charge them when you know that the case is too weak to even make it to trial.
Just a few hundred bad apples.
Wonder if they’ll use those fancy new face tracking cams to track abusers in the MET?! Oh wait they’d have no staff left if they did that since they’re all compliant grapists….just think of Wayne Couzens….they “jokingly” called him the grapist.
They’re called the filth for a reason
These guy are usually repeat offenders, he’ll find another child or children to offend. One time is too many,
I can’t wait for the usual top minds of /r/policeuk to turn up and tell us all why we’re wrong to castigate this person
Good job he wasn’t rude to someone on FB or they’d have thrown the book at him.
Two Tier Starmer
if the police cant gather enough evidence for THIS then we’re all fucked!
Comments are closed.