Link to the original clarification: https://www.bbc.co.uk/helpandfeedback/corrections_clarifications/

Posted by HogwartsZoologist

6 comments

  1. Can’t unring that bell, BBC. You needed to challenge him in the moment.

  2. Not the first time the BBC had a “lapse in their usual high editorial standards”.

  3. They posted this clarification only because Harry made this issue political. Otherwise they were fine with letting this man say whatever he wishes with no push back

  4. Damn, it would be nice if the US news media had to provide such statements when they publish biased info. Good on the BBC.

  5. “We allowed him to throw a tantrum on a worldwide stage. Sorry about that.”

  6. Anyone with a modicum of common sense understands that the man can’t continue receiving publicly funded security if he is not a working Royal. I don’t understand what the controversy is. He is given security if he comes for Royal Family engagements, if he is here to visit Stringfellows… I’m sorry mate but you have to pay yourself. Yes you were born Royal, but you renounced to the duties the birth entails so now… you are normal.

Comments are closed.