Congressman Nick Langworthy introduced new legislation aimed at curbing state and local bans on traditional energy sources, framing it as a defense of consumer choice and a rebuke to what he called “radical” climate policies.

The Energy Choice Act, co-sponsored by Senator Jim Justice of West Virginia, would prohibit governments from restricting access to energy connections based on the source or type of fuel. The legislation comes in direct response to actions by states like New York and California to limit the use of fossil fuels in buildings and homes.

“Governor Hochul and Democrats in Albany have waged an extremist crusade against natural gas… all to satisfy the radical fantasies of the far-left climate cult,” Langworthy said, warning that such policies have driven up energy costs and destabilized the grid. “People deserve the freedom to choose energy that is affordable, reliable, and proven.”

The bill, H.R. 3699, seeks to protect access to natural gas, propane, and other traditional fuels. Its sponsors argue that restricting these sources jeopardizes energy security, affordability, and infrastructure resilience—especially in colder climates.

Supporters of the measure include over 100 industry groups and trade associations ranging from the National Energy & Fuels Institute to the American Public Gas Association. Many warned that state-level bans threaten to increase consumer costs and strain electrical grids.

“Efforts by state governments to ban natural gas and other traditional energy sources not only hurt working families through higher costs but also jeopardize grid reliability,” said Congressman Mike Rulli of Ohio.

Congresswoman Claudia Tenney called the bill a necessary response to “authoritarian regulations” that undermine energy independence. Others echoed the importance of an “all-of-the-above” strategy that allows fossil fuels to coexist with renewables.

Langworthy, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, emphasized that his proposal targets “ideological mandates” and prioritizes consumer choice. His office claims the legislation would preserve energy diversity while supporting job creation and national security.

Organizations such as Americans for Prosperity, the Empire State Energy Association, and Concerned Veterans for America offered vocal endorsements, calling it a step toward reliable energy access and economic freedom.

The Energy Choice Act is currently under consideration in both chambers of Congress.

Get the latest headlines delivered to your inbox each morning. Sign up for our Morning Edition to start your day. FL1 on the Go! Download the free FingerLakes1.com App for iOS (iPhone, iPad).