Why are they bothering to greenlight them and waste taxpayer money if they’re just going to immediately throw a tantrum and pull them?
That ship sailed ages ago
A new low for the BBC
It’s really sad what the BBC has become. Nowadays it’s always parading right wing political parties, collaborating with genocidal theocratic regimes, and trying to distract us by stirring up endless culture war bullshit. Cancelled my TV license and uninstalled their player. I’m not helping to fund this.
Right decision. The BBC needs to do a way better job of vetting this sort of thing before greenlighting. While it’s welcome to have propaganda pulled, it shouldn’t have been approved in the first place.
What a load of nonsense, the BBC is so far from impartial, this may actually have tipped in their favour for that.wow
Impartial in what sense? Can’t find medics who think genocide is ok? Or do they want some Israeli spokesperson to spew out misinformation unchallenged. Representing the reality doesn’t require you to give equal time to both sides, just objectively report what’s happened, no need to cover pro-israeli talking points that are irrelevant and debunked.
I read this title and immediately assumed they pulled the documentary BECAUSE it was impartial.
Impartiality at the BBC? That ship sailed long ago and all on the back of extortion ie the Licence Fee extorted from people. How long would the BBC last in its current form if it had to rely on advertising or subscription?
Sometimes things aren’t impartial by their very nature.
BBC: Look, we have to be impartial on torture, £ape, famine as a weapon, ethnic cleansing, organ harvesting, sadistically shooting children through the head, genocide and racial supremacy, if we showed these things in a bad light- *that* would show bias.
12 comments
Why are they bothering to greenlight them and waste taxpayer money if they’re just going to immediately throw a tantrum and pull them?
That ship sailed ages ago
A new low for the BBC
It’s really sad what the BBC has become. Nowadays it’s always parading right wing political parties, collaborating with genocidal theocratic regimes, and trying to distract us by stirring up endless culture war bullshit. Cancelled my TV license and uninstalled their player. I’m not helping to fund this.
Right decision. The BBC needs to do a way better job of vetting this sort of thing before greenlighting. While it’s welcome to have propaganda pulled, it shouldn’t have been approved in the first place.
What a load of nonsense, the BBC is so far from impartial, this may actually have tipped in their favour for that.wow
Impartial in what sense? Can’t find medics who think genocide is ok? Or do they want some Israeli spokesperson to spew out misinformation unchallenged. Representing the reality doesn’t require you to give equal time to both sides, just objectively report what’s happened, no need to cover pro-israeli talking points that are irrelevant and debunked.
I read this title and immediately assumed they pulled the documentary BECAUSE it was impartial.
Impartiality at the BBC? That ship sailed long ago and all on the back of extortion ie the Licence Fee extorted from people. How long would the BBC last in its current form if it had to rely on advertising or subscription?
Sometimes things aren’t impartial by their very nature.
I hate to break it to people who still think it’s edgy and cool to knock the BBC as “biased”, but the red-pilled take isn’t that this is “bias”, so much as [coordination](https://www.declassifieduk.org/bbc-guardian-editors-private-meetings-with-israeli-general-kohavi/).
BBC: Look, we have to be impartial on torture, £ape, famine as a weapon, ethnic cleansing, organ harvesting, sadistically shooting children through the head, genocide and racial supremacy, if we showed these things in a bad light- *that* would show bias.
Comments are closed.