MAGA War Hawks Demand to Know if Vance Opposed Bombs

https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-war-hawks-demand-to-know-if-vance-opposed-bombs/

38 comments

  2. Oh no Vance things seem like they’re getting a little Pence-y for you….

  3. One of Trumps lesser hamberder facts has more influence over this administration than Vance does.

  5. Look guys, he has full confidence in the president with whatever he does and that he will be his only gutless answer to fucking anything. Vance is a the diet trump of this administration. Same suit, same tie color, instead of orange it’s my chemical romance mascara.

  6. Who cares? His influence on government policy is as strong as mine.

  8. His face said it all, Vance was angry. If he were in agreement he would have looked smug.

  10. >A [Reuters report](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-seeks-swift-action-iran-sources-say-with-split-us-administration-2025-06-21/)
    revealed that Vance allegedly “pushed back” against Israeli officials urging the United States’ involvement in Iran during a tense phone call Thursday with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and several top Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz, and military chief Eyal Zamir. Vance reportedly said that the U.S. “shouldn’t be directly involved” in the conflict.

  11. Cute they think he – or anyone else – was consulted before Trump told someone to do it.

  12. Trump definitely got steamrolled in the call with Netanyahu et al. Now that the decision to get involved has been made (under dubious Trump logic), Republicans demand everyone fall in line with zero dissent. Vance likely tried his method of troll boy intervention in the call (seen in the Zelenskyy meeting as example) and now the MAGATs are scrambling to ensure full fealty is maintained.

  13. Vance is without principle or backbone, he’ll fall in line with whoever he needs to as long as he gets to keep licking the boots of his betters.

  14. Random powerless people want to know if number one Trump loyalist will undermine his loyalty? Hmm…

  17. Did any of you get invited into the Signal chat and can tell us the real story?

  20. He was probably part of the Palantir plan …since he walks in the same circles as Thiel, Musk, Yarvin

  21. He absolutely didn’t question it!!! He’s a puppet for this fucking idiot!!!

  22. JD is for whatever he thinks allows him to accumulate power. It’s silly that they still pretend to want their leaders to be principled.

  23. His face in trump’s briefing suggested he wasn’t in favor of it

  24. I’m sure he said something critical after he was done zipping up Trump’s fly.

  25. Great way to drag us into another unending conflict you a-holes

  26. Vance was hand picked for his loyalty. If he had been VP in 2020 we would have had a much more serious coup attempt.

  27. Has any Vice EVER opposed their sitting President? Idk why, however justified, that this will be the first instance of that?

  28. Vance is supremely glib, which sometimes comes across like a corrective to Trump’s constantly chaotic expression. There entirely to present competence, also obeisance.
    But when he’s deployed to explain the inexplicable, he’s not looking good. Looks like the fat face baby meme.

    Only way that couch fucker gets elevated is technical.

  29. Not surprising, JD is a vet and know what this is leading to. He’s been in the shit on more than one occasion. He’s driven a knife through an enemy’s chest while looking into the other man’s eyes to watch his soul depart. He killed 16 Chechen rebels single handedly. Actually he was a stenographer but whatever.

  30. Vance is going to use this to become the Pres, and the Heritage Foundation wants that.

  32. It’s funny that you think Vance has an opinion at all other than “Yah boss!”

  33. Vance?.. Right now he is hiding in the bathroom trying to check what “oppose” means.

  34. In the signalgate chat, JD Vance was advising against striking the Houthis. He said protecting the Suez is not in American interests, as very little US trade goes through the canal. He said it would benefit Europe and said it was not “America first”

    It’s a big part of the story that is overlooked.

    There is no way in hell he actually supports striking Iran. But Trump did, and everyone right of center needs to be Trump’s gimp.

  37. MAGA war hawks? But I was told they were the anti-war movement…

  38. If you look at JD through the lens of a man hoping to inherit the keys to a kingdom that he can rule indefinitely, there’s some potential clarity on why he pussyfoots with status quo.

    His agenda isn’t the same as donald’s. It overlaps but with the caveat that he plans on being alive for 40+ more years. Some of this will splash back with enough time.

Comments are closed.