
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
Sign up here.
South Korea shows the cost of failing to satisfy such whims. The country sealed a free trade agreement with the U.S. that came into force in 2012. It did nothing to prevent today’s broadside. Now, Trump’s agenda could slow Korean industrial giants’ efforts to ramp production on American shores: recent cuts to electric-vehicle subsidies may ding the likes of battery maker SK On and automaker Hyundai.
Furthermore, what any country gets for reaching a “deal” is still nebulous beyond lowering rates that have never been imposed. Look at Vietnam, where Trump announced a tentative agreement setting a 20% tariff and a levy designed to target products passing through the country from elsewhere. Monday’s announcements for South Korea and Japan, where there is no deal, involve the same “trans-shipment” charge plus a 25% baseline rate. According to the White House, Vietnam even dropped its tariffs on U.S. goods to zero.
Meanwhile, new bugbears – like an additional threatened 10% duty on the BRICS nations – creep up. Whether the tumult can ever really end is unclear. The best outcome for any country might be the framework sealed with the UK, which softened some trade barriers but little else. It’s a small win now, without relying on Trump not to simply change his mind in the future.
Editing by Jonathan Guilford; Production by Pranav Kiran
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab