Super novica za BlackRock, Vanguard in State Street
Pozdravljam proteste, vesel sem, da imajo Ukrajinci dovolj demokracije, da lahko protestirajo, za razliko od svojih sosed.
Je pa zanimivo kako imamo tukaj spet povečano količino linkov od rusofilov zadnje dni.
Uvod v slovo zelenskega. Me zanima kako se bodo EU politiki odzvali na to?
To bo zanimivo, kako se bo to razpletlo. IMO je najbolj odvisno od Trumpa, če bo še naprej podpiral Zelenskega, bodo te proteste z lahkoto zatrli in bomo še naprej pošiljali denar v davčne oaze preko ukrajinske elite. Spodaj je en dober opis te tematike.
*A relatively short and simple explanation of why so many Ukrainians are outraged, as I see it*
*NABU and SAPO are anti-corruption bodies (the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office) created to investigate and prosecute high-level corruption, and they are part of the anti-corruption strategy that Ukraine has been pursuing for 11 years.*
*Corruption is a core issue for Ukrainians.*
*First, not long ago, the head of NABU was not appointed despite the candidate successfully passing the competition and all stages of the selection process.*
*Second, the law that was amended to change NABU and SAPO’s subordination to the Prosecutor General was originally about missing persons. Yesterday morning, those amendments were added in violation of the parliamentary procedure. Moreover, the author of the amendments is Buzhansky — a notorious pro-russian MP and friend of Kiva (may the ground be concrete for him).*
*Third, Ukrainians have never seen a law passed and signed so quickly by the Speaker and President, which is particularly frustrating, since critical laws — about demobilization, veterans, and so on — have been stuck for years without a vote.*
*Fourth, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the judicial system are the structures that needed reform “yesterday,” but instead, they are being granted even more powers. These are exactly the parts of the state apparatus that were never reformed. In reality, no matter what reforms happen around them — if the prosecutors and courts are corrupt and dysfunctional — there is no rule of law.*
*Fifth, the situation escalated after the scandal involving Unity’s Deputy Prime Minister Chernyshov. NABU charged him with abuse of office and receiving an unlawful benefit in particularly large amounts. During the investigation, he was abroad but returned to Ukraine. After that, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reported that FSB agents had infiltrated NABU.*
*Sixth, FSB agents have been found in all Ukrainian institutions without exception, but never before has it triggered such rapid action from parliament and the president.*
*Seventh, the communication has been a complete failure. What the president is doing now — gathering heads of agencies and announcing that there will be a strategy and plan in two weeks — should have happened before the law was voted on.*
*Eighth, Ukrainians are skeptical about such disproportionate actions, especially when it looks like a cover-up to protect friends from accountability. Chernyshov is a close friend of Yermak.*
*Ninth, Tatarov — a figure from the Yanukovych era who actively destroyed democratic institutions in Ukraine and voted for his dictatorial laws — is still working in the President’s Office. He should have been banned from public office through lustration, yet now he holds one of the highest positions in the country.*
*Tenth, Ukrainians genuinely want everyone to be equal before the law. But if anti-corruption bodies are subordinated to the most corrupt institutions in Ukraine, there’s no hope that true equality before the law will ever exist.*
*In my humble opinion, the prosecutorial and judicial system must be reformed right here and now. Otherwise, nothing else will work.*
Sem zelo vesel ostrega odziva ukrajinske javnosti. In glej ga zlomka, nobenega policijskega nasilja, aretacij in padcev iz oken. Ne, Zelebski je celo že napovedal, da se bodo lotili te teme nemudoma. Ga je pa vsekakor konkretno usral s tem, da je ta zakon podpisal.
Putina je treba ustavit! Danes Gaza, Libanon, Sirija, Jemen… Ne bo se ustavil, ima apetite tudi po Estoniji, Latviji, Litvi… Treba se je oboroziti, da se zascitimo pred Putinom!
Pomoje je to zahteva oranžnega, da bodo lahko speljali tisti dogovor in še naprej prejemali orožje. Sicer so pa še ne dolgo nazaj imeli skupno državo z rusi, zato jim korupcija ni tuja.
A ko sem leto dni nazaj napisal, da je vojna v Ukrajini največja operacija pranja denarja v zgodovini sem seveda bil označen za rusofila hahah
Evo vam, odpravljajo anti-korupcijske institucije
Hmm, le zakaj?
Putin je napadel Ukraino, Gazo, Libanon, Sirijo in Jemen… Vse to v zadnjih 3 letih… Oboroziti se moramo, Putina je treba ustaviti pa naj stane milijarde!
Cakamo, da bo Kaja S. napisala o tem kak nepristranski clanek,wink, wink. Ampak na drugi strani, izgleda, res, da to ni popularen ukrep. V vsaki demokraciji bi to bil nepopularen ukrep. Toda, ukr je v vojni za prezivetje, in ta agencija je bila inflitrirana s strani rusov. Pod takimi pogoji, spraviti agencijo pod kontrolo drzave niti ni tako nesmisleno.
Ali se je Evropska komisija z VdL na čelu že kaj oglasila uradno glede tega ukrepa v Ukrajini?
Se bodo EU politiki slikali na strani protestnikov v naslednjih dneh?
12 comments
🧃🧃🧃🧃🧃
Super novica za BlackRock, Vanguard in State Street
Pozdravljam proteste, vesel sem, da imajo Ukrajinci dovolj demokracije, da lahko protestirajo, za razliko od svojih sosed.
Je pa zanimivo kako imamo tukaj spet povečano količino linkov od rusofilov zadnje dni.
Uvod v slovo zelenskega. Me zanima kako se bodo EU politiki odzvali na to?
To bo zanimivo, kako se bo to razpletlo. IMO je najbolj odvisno od Trumpa, če bo še naprej podpiral Zelenskega, bodo te proteste z lahkoto zatrli in bomo še naprej pošiljali denar v davčne oaze preko ukrajinske elite. Spodaj je en dober opis te tematike.
*A relatively short and simple explanation of why so many Ukrainians are outraged, as I see it*
*NABU and SAPO are anti-corruption bodies (the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office) created to investigate and prosecute high-level corruption, and they are part of the anti-corruption strategy that Ukraine has been pursuing for 11 years.*
*Corruption is a core issue for Ukrainians.*
*First, not long ago, the head of NABU was not appointed despite the candidate successfully passing the competition and all stages of the selection process.*
*Second, the law that was amended to change NABU and SAPO’s subordination to the Prosecutor General was originally about missing persons. Yesterday morning, those amendments were added in violation of the parliamentary procedure. Moreover, the author of the amendments is Buzhansky — a notorious pro-russian MP and friend of Kiva (may the ground be concrete for him).*
*Third, Ukrainians have never seen a law passed and signed so quickly by the Speaker and President, which is particularly frustrating, since critical laws — about demobilization, veterans, and so on — have been stuck for years without a vote.*
*Fourth, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the judicial system are the structures that needed reform “yesterday,” but instead, they are being granted even more powers. These are exactly the parts of the state apparatus that were never reformed. In reality, no matter what reforms happen around them — if the prosecutors and courts are corrupt and dysfunctional — there is no rule of law.*
*Fifth, the situation escalated after the scandal involving Unity’s Deputy Prime Minister Chernyshov. NABU charged him with abuse of office and receiving an unlawful benefit in particularly large amounts. During the investigation, he was abroad but returned to Ukraine. After that, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reported that FSB agents had infiltrated NABU.*
*Sixth, FSB agents have been found in all Ukrainian institutions without exception, but never before has it triggered such rapid action from parliament and the president.*
*Seventh, the communication has been a complete failure. What the president is doing now — gathering heads of agencies and announcing that there will be a strategy and plan in two weeks — should have happened before the law was voted on.*
*Eighth, Ukrainians are skeptical about such disproportionate actions, especially when it looks like a cover-up to protect friends from accountability. Chernyshov is a close friend of Yermak.*
*Ninth, Tatarov — a figure from the Yanukovych era who actively destroyed democratic institutions in Ukraine and voted for his dictatorial laws — is still working in the President’s Office. He should have been banned from public office through lustration, yet now he holds one of the highest positions in the country.*
*Tenth, Ukrainians genuinely want everyone to be equal before the law. But if anti-corruption bodies are subordinated to the most corrupt institutions in Ukraine, there’s no hope that true equality before the law will ever exist.*
*In my humble opinion, the prosecutorial and judicial system must be reformed right here and now. Otherwise, nothing else will work.*
Sem zelo vesel ostrega odziva ukrajinske javnosti. In glej ga zlomka, nobenega policijskega nasilja, aretacij in padcev iz oken. Ne, Zelebski je celo že napovedal, da se bodo lotili te teme nemudoma. Ga je pa vsekakor konkretno usral s tem, da je ta zakon podpisal.
Putina je treba ustavit! Danes Gaza, Libanon, Sirija, Jemen… Ne bo se ustavil, ima apetite tudi po Estoniji, Latviji, Litvi… Treba se je oboroziti, da se zascitimo pred Putinom!
Pomoje je to zahteva oranžnega, da bodo lahko speljali tisti dogovor in še naprej prejemali orožje. Sicer so pa še ne dolgo nazaj imeli skupno državo z rusi, zato jim korupcija ni tuja.
A ko sem leto dni nazaj napisal, da je vojna v Ukrajini največja operacija pranja denarja v zgodovini sem seveda bil označen za rusofila hahah
Evo vam, odpravljajo anti-korupcijske institucije
Hmm, le zakaj?
Putin je napadel Ukraino, Gazo, Libanon, Sirijo in Jemen… Vse to v zadnjih 3 letih… Oboroziti se moramo, Putina je treba ustaviti pa naj stane milijarde!
Cakamo, da bo Kaja S. napisala o tem kak nepristranski clanek,wink, wink. Ampak na drugi strani, izgleda, res, da to ni popularen ukrep. V vsaki demokraciji bi to bil nepopularen ukrep. Toda, ukr je v vojni za prezivetje, in ta agencija je bila inflitrirana s strani rusov. Pod takimi pogoji, spraviti agencijo pod kontrolo drzave niti ni tako nesmisleno.
Ali se je Evropska komisija z VdL na čelu že kaj oglasila uradno glede tega ukrepa v Ukrajini?
Se bodo EU politiki slikali na strani protestnikov v naslednjih dneh?
Comments are closed.