Refugee charities have warned that thousands of people in the UK could find themselves homeless on the streets this winter after a quiet reversal in asylum accommodation policy by the Home Office.

The Guardian has learned that ministers are planning to halve the period asylum seekers are given to find new accommodation after getting a decision on their case from 56 to 28 days. Refugee organisations say this will not give people enough time to find work and a home to rent and will lead to people pitching tents in the streets.

The British Red Cross is among those raising concerns about an increase in rough sleeping among refugees and along with other refugee NGOs calling on the government to rethink.

Alex Fraser, the British Red Cross director of refugee services, said: “Reducing the ‘move-on’ period will increase levels of homelessness and destitution for people granted protection and put additional pressure on local authorities.

“The numbers don’t add up. It takes around 35 days to receive universal credit. Local authorities need 56 days to work with households at risk of homelessness. Giving people only 28 days to find work, housing or support isn’t enough time.

“Making people destitute ends up costing the taxpayer more money and causing distress and hardship. We urge the government to review this decision.”

The government is already grappling with a crisis over the use of hotels for asylum seekers with dozens of protests staged by anti-migrant groups and individuals in recent weeks.

Ministers are under pressure to expedite hotel closures and have committed to speeding up asylum decision making, something that has been welcomed by refugee organisations and by asylum seekers.

But if there is not sufficient time for refugees to find work and accommodation it is likely to lead to an increase in street homelessness.

Government data for the year ending June 2025 showed that 110,000 people received a decision on their asylum claim, with about half granted leave to remain.

According to the No Accommodation Network (Naccom), which has 140 charity and community group members supporting people facing homelessness in the asylum and immigration system, in 2023/2024 homelessness among refugee adults increased by 99% with a sharp increase in rough sleeping of 125%, particularly among new refugees as a result of too short a time period for move on.

skip past newsletter promotion

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

In response to these concerns Home Office introduced a 56-day move-on pilot scheme in December 2024 which led to a marked decrease in street homelessness among this group. One Red Cross source said that since the 56-day policy was introduced they could not remember the last time a refugee had asked them for a tent.

But now the government is reversing this and reverting to giving single adults just 28 days to find new accommodation. It is understood there will be some exceptions to the rule including pregnant women, families and elderly people who will still have 56 days to find a new home.

Steve Smith, the chief executive of Care4Calais said: “Cutting the move-on period back to 28 days isn’t just bad for newly granted refugees, it’s bad for our communities and extremely bad for councils who are picking up the tab of increasing homelessness.”

Bridget Young, director of Naccom, said: “We are hugely disappointed by ministers’ decision to revert back to the 28-day notice period for refugees with the fewest options available to them and therefore at most risk of homelessness and destitution. Evidence from Naccom’s frontline members indicates that the 56-day move-on period has been a lifeline for new refugees.

“This decision will put more pressure on local authorities and voluntary sector services who always have to pick up the pieces to knee-jerk government policy change. This change is also being made at a time of increasing risk due to racism and anti-migrant rhetoric, which we worry will only increase the danger people will face on the streets. We urgently ask government to reconsider this decision.”