Evacuation of Gaza City would be unsafe and unfeasible, says head of Red Cross

5 comments

1. They said that about rafa too.

   Here’s a cool idea; give up the hostages, surrender and turn over all your weapons. Then there will be no invasion of gaza city. The game is up. No amount of international pressure or force can make it stop. Hell, Egypt and Jordan are full on board despite what they may say to their domestic viewership.

   So if you actually give a damn about your populace, the civillians, women and children you’ll do the right thing. That’s to surrender, release all the hostages and agree too disarm.

2. This is a misreading of the situation by the Red Cross. Israel is demanding the evacuation of Palestinians *because* it’s unsafe and isn’t feasible. The idea is to kill as many Palestinians as possible while pretending you don’t mean to. Hence why they keep saying that aren’t starving Palestinians, just there’s no way to let food in.

   I’m surprised the Red Cross has bothered to say anything, though. They seemed quite content to stay quiet while Israel was mass murdering Palestinian ambulance drivers, doctors and nurses. All those ambulances with a Red Crescent in the side shot up, crushed and buried and the Red Cross didn’t stay a word. Guess the racism still runs deep.

3. Said the same about Rafah. They managed to do that.

   Next, they killed Sinwar in Rafah. When this is over, I’m going to be so glad that I won’t have to be hearing this screeching again.

4. More dangerous to evacuate than to stay? 

5. They said the evacuation of Rafa was impossible… but when push came to shove they managed to do it.

   Advocating against the evacuation of starving civilians from famine conditions in an active war zone because it wouldn’t be “safe and dignified” is a baffling position from the Red Cross.

Comments are closed.