Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
As the U.S. government heads into another shutdown, prominent economists are weighing in with their takes, offering fresh warnings while expressing their frustrations.
Economist Justin Wolfers of the University of Michigan dismissed the economic impact, calling the shutdown “just not that big of a macroeconomic event,” but criticized it as “a costly charade, an infuriating waste, and a pointless spectacle,” on Tuesday, in a post on X.
Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it?
Wolfers added that the entire charade has become routine for the federal government, with several instances of shutdowns in recent decades, but said that it “eventually will pass,” in a video snippet accompanying his post, featuring his recent appearance on CNN.
He noted that public servants who often stay home during shutdowns and are later paid retroactively, and as a result, he finds all of this “awfully pointless.”
Economist and former CEO of PIMCO, Mohamed El-Erian said that past shutdowns “tended to be short in duration,” which he said was primarily because “they are unpopular with voters and both parties typically share the blame,” in a post on X.
However, this time around, El-Erian is concerned about political escalation. “What may make this shutdown different is that the Administration has promised ‘a lot’ of firings, or what some are labeling DOGE 2.0.”
See Also: 7 Million Gamers Already Trust Gameflip With Their Digital Assets — Now You Can Own a Stake in the Platform
Here El-Erian is referring to Trump’s latest threats to lay off federal workers and cut Democratic-backed programs if Congress fails to approve new funding.
Story Continues