What’s your London? The shiny glass towers of the modern city, or the crooked red-brick charm of its history?
by Substantial-Bat-4438
What’s your London? The shiny glass towers of the modern city, or the crooked red-brick charm of its history?
by Substantial-Bat-4438
35 comments
London is one of few cities that balances the modern and the old very well. Especially in the city of. That said if I had to chose one it would be old
the red brick charm can still be build today and is much nicer imho
https://preview.redd.it/1zx912j87ysf1.jpeg?width=1600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f171b0e456a9a78aa36178bd7a98af21660a9b7
that’s not crooked
The combination of both
Both!
Both obviously!
I like both! Makes London what it is
Both. All of it.
Crooked red brick all day long.
Shiny glass towers of the modern city
Well, my aunt lived in Kensington gore, so I think I have to say there.
Both. I fuckin love it.
Not just the red brick seen extensively in the middle of town but the yellow brick that survives more in the suburbs. The steel and glass for the show-off buildings in the City and Canary Wharf I can take, but lack soul.
What kills me is the stuff like the explosion along the south bank of the river between Vauxhall and Battersea. Who does this benefit? The vast majority of Londoners will never be able to afford a home there. Non-dom residents sitting on a property investment
red brick or white stone buildings is what i like
Both but also the graffiti-covered streets with strange little shops, the Georgian garden squares, the brutalist ex-council flats, the cobbled mews, what a fucking city
As everyone else says, both. I love the way you can be somewhere like St Dunstan in the East Church, basically a ruin which is beautiful, walk 20m up the road and you’re staring at a building called the bloody walkie talkie.
Concrete labyrinths of Barbican estate
The actually London dirty yellow bricks of our industrial heritage. The true colour of 10 downing street for instance is the same yellow as the South Londob viaducts (if you blast off all the grime)

Both
As a Yank, I truly admire the balance between the old and the new. Aside from the great people and culture, it’s what makes London, for me, the greatest city in the world.
London doesn’t exist without both. One of the greatest mixes of architecture in the world.
Yes
Crying at a kebab shop while the rain grazes my hair and falls into the Pita to make it softer and the red bricks give off that musty rain smell.
Both and neither. Most Londoners live outside of central London and we have even more than just these two, we have lower rise buildings, and houses, and parks.
The idea of it only being those 2 is just focused on certain areas of London that get the most visitors.
What a dumb question
Why not both? Both is good.
Got to say and probably a lame answer but I love both.
The one I live in is industrial estate meets 50s council estate meets tesla driving shared ownerships.
Historical will always have my heart
The answer is, of course, both!!
Yes
The Middle Eastern part.
100% the Barbican.
Comments are closed.