Relevant countries are in the middle

by Bagheera29200

50 comments

  1. Damn we’re gonna have to give a seat of the high council to India.

    Pains me to admit it cause it will give joy to the insufferable indian nationalists but it is what it is.

  3. >relevant

    >russoids

    Keep dreaming Ivan, you still have a few million years to go

  4. You dont even have an aircraft carrier Switzerland? Why ever not?

  6. Dutch would send target country a tikkie for the missile cost afterwards.

  7. I thought Russia didn’t have an aircraft carrier anymore?

  9. If the US would suddenly isolate, the shared NATO nuclear arsenal in NL, BE, DE and IT would no longer be available.

    The UK would have around 120 deployable warheads, but only 40–60 Trident II D5 missiles -leased from the US- at their disposal for around two years, until they seriously degrade.

    That would leave France as the only nuclear power in the civilised world. Given their hoo-haw about the Maginot line, I doubt they will do anything more than being a deterrent

  11. Oh, I did not know that many countries have aircraft carriers.
    Pedro, Malle is very full every year now, and so are all the other good places.
    Aircraft carriers have an entire runway of empty space. Can you please build some cheap hotels on top of it?

  13. Remove spain from the carriers list, look at the Juan Carlos I carrier, its humiliating

  16. If the new japanese prime minister has any say in it, Japan may be moving to the middle in the next few years

  17. What´s the link between relevant countries and aircraft carriers?

  18. Proud to be part of the GDP $1T club despite only having a population of 9 million. Who’s winning the per capita race now, Jan??

  21. We don’t appear here because obviously we are the Peace Lords (never done anything wrong).

  22. Russia has 1 aircraft carrier, and it doesn‘t work.

    I‘m also suspicious of their GDP…

  24. This is the dumbest chart I have ever seen. Who ever made this is a moron

  25. In I think 2005 Sweden managed to sink US aircraft carrier with their electronic diesel submarine- so you know It sure is nice to have an aircraft carrier but it isn’t like those are untouchable, unsinkable marvels of technology.

  28. We are one of the few that have fought against most of them at the same time and still won the battlefield (lost in the political field, but that does not count).

  29. Interesting how except for India all of them are permanent EU members

  30. 7 European countries are on this list- damn if there only could be a way to unite them into this all mighty powerful block… It would be nice I can tell you that.

    Edit: I am not counting Swiss

  31. So… France, England, England’s eastern colony, England and France’s western colony, Russia, China

  32. Replace “Aircraft Carriers” for corporations that meet the criteria. For science.

  34. A gdp over 1 trillion isnt a flex when 17,5% of all humans live in your country

  36. Australia got rid of its aircraft carrier decades ago, this infographic is regarded.

  39. Now also condition aircraft carriers to be nuclear-powerew

  40. Were just gonna throw a few towels at France and solve the problem.

  43. Russia hs no working carrier and it was the biggest pos anyways

  47. Neither Spain, Australia nor Brazil still have aircraft carriers although they had them in the past

  48. Are we calling every ship with a flat surface and aircraft carrier now, half of those are glorified floating helicopter parking lots. Great power wannabes.

  49. Can we add a circle about great food ? I am not comfortable so close to Barry

  50. 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🥖🥖🥖🇫🇷🇫🇷🥐🥐🥐

Comments are closed.