Donald Trump’s U.S. Presidency 2.0 differs in one great respect from the 1.0 beta version. The aim is the same – to cement his country as the leading superpower on the planet – but the approach in dealing with America’s rivals has a sharper edge. Nowhere has this been more clearly seen than in his administration’s dealings with the self-appointed leader of the alternative new world order, China. The imposition of further sanctions on more of Beijing’s key mechanisms for effectively continuing to bankroll Iran and Russia is a case in point, and more of the same is expected to follow.

In his first presidency, Trump was often criticised – even by those closest to him – as being soft on Beijing. The most serious of these accusations was stated by Trump’s former National Security Adviser, John Bolton, that the then-President “[gave up] security considerations for trade”. An early notable case in point had been the almost complete reversal of hard-hitting U.S. sanctions imposed on Chinese telecommunications company ZTE for committing major and repeated violations of the U.S. sanctions on Iran and North Korea. According to Bolton, after a private telephone call to President Xi – in which it transpired that Xi told Trump that he would “owe [Trump] a favour” if he reduced the sanctions against ZTE – Trump did exactly what Xi had asked for. Shortly after doing this, Trump tweeted: “President Xi of China and I are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast. Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done!” As Bolton put it in his book on the first Trump Presidency: “Since when had we started to worry about jobs in China?”

Related: Kurdistan’s Oil Exports Top 200,000 Bpd amid Fragile New Deal

However, as sources close to that first administration exclusively indicated to OilPrice.com at the time and subsequently, this approach was more a measure of the relative political naivety of the administration at the time than anything else. “Trump was used to dealing with rivals in a certain way based on his real estate background and elements of that carried into the first presidency,” said one such Washington-based source. “But he [Trump] saw that this method didn’t achieve the objectives he wanted, so they have changed this time around,” he added. “So now, he is still willing to play pally when he thinks it is beneficial to getting what he wants, but the flipside is a no-[BS] response,” he underlined. This was most palpably evidenced recently with the U.S.’s military support for wide-ranging Israeli strikes against Iran’s nuclear programme targets after his 60-day deadline to Iran to reach a new nuclear agreement. Before that, President-Elect Trump was key to pushing for the use of the critical operational elements that saw the removal of Bashar al-Assad from Syria in December – a regime that had been a particular irritant to him in his first term. He did this despite his apparently ‘friendly relationship’ with Russian President Vladimir Putin, with a key aim also being: “To put Moscow’s, Beijing’s and Tehran’s leadership on notice that Washington can easily redraw and restructure borders and regimes in not just the Middle East but also in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, if it wants to,” a senior source connected to the European Union’s security complex exclusively told OilPrice.com at the time.

Story Continues