https://www.irishnews.com/news/northern-ireland/queens-university-student-group-launches-bi-lingual-signs-sticker-protest-at-monolingual-campus-H6CQOZVEEBHGBMH4VP66LKPZC4/

An Cumann Gaelach slates “decades of inaction” over language policy but unionist student group says stickers create ‘chill factor’

Student activists at Queen’s University have been implementing their own bi-lingual signs policy by placing Irish language stickers at key locations across campus.

The move, by campaign group An Cumann Gaelach, was sparked by “decades of inaction” over language policy at what they say is a “monolingual campus”.

Sharing several examples online, An Cumann Gaelach group said: “As part of our campaign against a monolingual campus, some activists put bilingual signs of their own around campus.

“With the ‘institutional commitment’ the university has made to promote linguistic diversity, we are looking forward to the implementation of official bilingual signage over the weeks and months ahead.”

While the society claims the move was in keeping with the university’s efforts to normalise the Irish language, Jay Basra who chairs the QUB Young Unionists group said it created “a chill factor” for others.

“Queen’s University Belfast is moving towards a digital signage policy, a direction that has been clearly and repeatedly outlined to us during meetings with the administration,” he said.

“This has also been communicated to the group responsible. To those behind the recent ‘stickering’ campaign, if they truly value the Irish language as deeply as they claim, why diminish it by covering the campus with stickers they know will soon be removed?”

Jay Basra was the UUP's Mid Ulster candidate in the recent general election

Jay Basra chairs the QUB Young Unionists group.
“Such actions do little to promote cultural pride and instead undermine the seriousness of their cause.”

He also claimed that a student petition run earlier in the year did not even receive 10% support, adding: “Why impose something the majority do not want?

“There is also a chill factor associated with physical signage. History shows that when similar signage was displayed in the 1980s and 1990s, Unionist students felt discouraged from taking part in Students’ Union life.

“Reintroducing that environment today would be the physical manifestation of the ‘cold house’ perception that this university has worked so hard to move beyond.”

There are currently no plans to formally introduce dual language signs at Queen's University.

An Cumann Gaelach’s Campaigns Officer, Eoghan Ó Conghaile, said the response to the stickers had mainly been positive.

“The stickers included both English and Irish, so you have to understand the imposition of English only signage as a neutral default,” he said.

“I think a better question is to why activists felt they had to go out and do this.”

He added: “I think a lot of opposition to dual language signage is often routed in a lack of knowledge.

“These stickers broaden access to the Irish language, contrary to a lot of media narratives – this doesn’t affect English language signs in any way. This is international best practice and does not infringe on any who wish not to speak Irish.”

He said his group’s consultation into greater visibility for Irish on campus gained 5% support of the student body, but this did not mean the remaining 95% disagreed.

“Opposition to the Irish language on campus can, at times, be rooted in intolerance and we feel that as a leading third level institution that prides itself on inclusivity, Queen’s University should be taking proactive steps in tackling such negative attitudes,” he said.

With “decades of inaction” from the university doing nothing to promote a better understanding of Irish, he said it was “high time for a new approach”.

While no commitment is in place to formally introduce dual language signs at Queen’s University, last week the university reported a 227% increase in the number of students registering for Irish courses.

A QUB spokesperson said: “We are always keen to listen and engage with our student body and the University management has had several meetings with An Cumann Gaelach.

“The University’s (Equality, Diversity and Inclusion) policy includes linguistic and cultural identity, with significant and ongoing progress in the promotion of the Irish language including the recent creation of bespoke accommodation for students who are Irish speakers and the creation of the new post of Irish Language Officer based in the University’s language centre.”

by staghallows

15 comments
  1. “unionist student group” what do they discuss all day

  2. Could we rename the whole university ?

    Doesn’t seem right for it to be named after a member the monarchy in this day and age, as I’m sure you’ll agree the institution of the monarchy is disgusting

  3. > “There is also a chill factor associated with physical signage. History shows that when similar signage was displayed in the 1980s and 1990s, Unionist students felt discouraged from taking part in Students’ Union life.

    Reminder that Queen’s has it’s own Orange lodge.

  4. Wasn’t it Terence O’Neill who stated that Northern Ireland was a ‘cold house’ for Catholics?

  5. Unionists need to start applying UK norms to themselves and support minority languages. Just like in Wales and Scotland.

  6. The whole sign thing is not a bad idea, but a bit of a red herring.

    People have already been debating it for years. When I was on the SU council, people would filibuster about it for hours and always receive support, but the SU council had little power over the University higher-ups.

    At the end of the day, the best way to cater to and promote the Irish language would be the introduction of general degrees taught in the language (as opposed to the Irish language degree taught to English speakers).

    Worldwide, it isn’t expected for Universities to include signage written in languages they do not offer courses in. Some countries have more than a dozen official languages, it wouldn’t be feasible. Even in Canada for example, French is not represented all across the country.

    Is there actually a large enough demand for these courses currently? Not sure, but probably not. Those native speakers who wish to be taught in Irish presumably attend universities in ROI.

  7. when i studied there my language class was multi lingual so should the signs as well be multi lingual and not bi lingual

  8. anyone who feels uncomfortable by the presence of the irish language is a piece of shit

  9. If my mother tongue is shaking the foundation of your state, it probably means that you built your state on my land.

  10. Union was full of Irish signage when I was at Queen’s. Didn’t bother me then, wouldn’t bother me now.

    When was it removed?

  11. “if they truly value the Irish language as deeply as they claim, why diminish it by covering the campus with stickers they know will soon be removed?”

    Not how language works.

  12. Never heard a word of Gaelic spoken in Belfast or the Queen’s University. It’s a hobby language and will never be anything more than that. It shouldn’t be taken as seriously as English.

    “Decades of inaction”? There’s almost no serious grassroots demand for Gaelic language and signage in Belfast. If there was, we would be hearing it more spoken casually in the open. “Demand” is being manufactured by activists and politicians with too much time on their hands.

  13. I don’t speak Irish. I’ve never been interested in speaking it (I consider it a dead language for my purposes).

    But I have absolutely no problem with this. Just because I’m culturally stunted by my upbringing doesn’t mean the future has to be.

    The government should invest in therapy for anyone who has a freak out about this. I can understand hating the IRA for what they did, but hating the Irish language when 90% of the English call unionists “Irish” just shows there’s a problem in unionism.

Comments are closed.