Posted by ButIDigress79

15 comments
  1. I can’t believe Harry is the black sheep when you have a person who slept with underage human trafficking victims.

  2. I agree with everything leveled in this piece against Charles (he deserves all of it and more) but it’s farcical to argue that Elizabeth contained the Andrew crisis. She enabled him at every turn, throughout his entire feckless life, and shares in the blame for letting it get so far.

    It is insane that Charles thinks anyone perceives him as some kind of devout, healing pillar of Christianity. His main association will always be the cheating husband he was to Diana.

  3. Although I agree Queen Elizabeth did nothing to tackle the fact Prince Andrew is allegedly a criminal, Charles has also done nothing. He has had three years to tackle this issue.

  4. “The reality is that Charles was already pulling many of the strings by 2019. He was the mastermind behind the 2020 decision to strip Andrew of his HRH, and the 2022 decision to settle with Virginia Giuffre, who alleged that Andrew raped her three times, and who died by suicide earlier this year.”

  5. I remember that story about the Carol concert from last December, which is even more funny when you consider that Charles and Camilla didn’t attend themselves.

    As for the rest, Charles has spent most of his adult life trying to pin his actions on and offload his responsibilities to other people, “poor little helpless useless me, can’t you see what they’re doing to me, can’t you see what they’re making me do, don’t you feel sorry for me?” It’s pathetic

    I was reading something about the Mark Bolland years, I think it was Penny Junor who’s very pro Charles, it was about Harry’s drug scandal and the tone was “poor helpless widower Charles was at the end of his rope and didn’t know what to do, he had no choice but to call William and plead with him to talk some sense into Harry” 🙄

    Charles was in his 60s, he couldn’t parent his 16 year old son, and had to call his 18 year old son who was in Chile for his gap year at the time to do it for him, and he was making it public because he thought people would sympathize with him in that scenario 🙄

  6. Damn, that’s harsh but fair. I suspect after the last few weeks Charles will be a king in name only and William will call all the shots

  7. Lol, they’re like rats in a sack all briefing against each other. And none of them care about the fact that they’re still allowing someone who has been credibly accused of some of the most disgusting crimes to escape justice.

  8. It appeared to me that the RF was trying to slowly reintroduce Andrew to the public.  In what role? Who knows.  Andrew and Fergie attended Christmas church services that year too.   Virginia Guiffres book and the other book on the Yorks “Entitled” blew that up.  Curious if neither were published if Andrew would have been eased back in.  

  9. Just get rid off them all. I enjoy the gossip but there’s no point to any of these people or the monarchy as an institution, they’re all varying degrees of moral blackholes.

  10. The sooner people realize that the royal family only cares about Andrew insofar as him impacting their PR. No one is opposed to Andrew on principle, we know this because they’ve made a point to continue having him at Christmas and Easter.

    No one in this family has signaled any level of empathy or understanding towards Epstein’s victims, and it will always be a public relations issue instead of a moral one for them.

  11. They keep passing around the blame for Andrew. First it was Queen Elizabeth’s fault now it’s Charles. With a lot of King Charles his recent moves, I wonder what he wants his legacy to be.

Comments are closed.