For context this is what she claimed a few days ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/RoyalsGossip/comments/1ohsskv/emily_maitlis_reports_william_threatened_cousins/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Many people on that post were saying that she was a serious journalist with impeccable sources, this just seems like a mess.





Posted by Miss_Marple_24

24 comments

  2. One revelation that I found from the book Entitled is Emily only knew 72 hours before that she was interviewing Andrew. Most of the questions and research was done by whole another team (2 women) in BBC Ireland and they handed all their research to Panaroma. However, those 2 never got credit for their work. Emily and another producer got lot of praises , 2 different movies showing their perspectives.

    Btw I think she deserves all accolades for that interview. It was extraordinary. Just something that I found in the book Entitled.

  3. … what about the mental health of the victims? Are they actually joking? His victim killed herself, I couldn’t give a shit about the rapists mental health.

  4. Who cares about Andrew’s mental health? His victim killed herself. He even tried to run a smear campaign against her on top of all the vile shit he put her through

  5. William being told off by his dad.

    She should say – these people care about their image, lack a moral compass and this briefing war as so petty and an illustration of the poor state of the royals.

  6. So the palace corrected which narrative they wanted the press to pump out

  7. So it’s pretty obvious the British media disseminate propaganda from the royal family.

  8. This flip flopping only makes me think their PR sucks.

    What is the point of this? It doesn’t make anyone look better, frankly.

  9. ![gif](giphy|6HFUDKwlWcAbC)

    Found footage of Kensington and Buckingham palaces.

  10. Wait. Do we really believe this? William is known to have one hell of a short fuse.

  12. I am sorry but I can’t believe for one second that William or Kate would care for a pedo’s mental health even if it’s his uncle.

  14. I remember that! Everyone claiming she was a “serious” journalist and has never been wrong like we don’t know a lot of their “sources” are actually clueless, people will fall for anything…

  15. Cracking up at people finally realizing that royal reporting is rumours and whatever propaganda factions within the palace feed the press

  16. Yeah right. William isn’t soft. But Charles wants credit for this 

  18. This makes everyone look bad – including Maitlis, who, until now, seemed to have some credibility.

  19. She’s just making it up as she goes along, much like Andrew. She spun the story that William was the bad guy, stealing the titles from the little princesses, and not wanting to have creepy uncle Andrew as a next-door neighbour- probably to protect the king from any blowback. But now that it looks like the public loves the idea, she’s coming out to revise it to say that William is a weak sappy guy, and the king has the nerves of steel. Under the bus you go again William, for a different reason. What Charles won’t have people say to boost his public image is a pretty small list. What a load of tosh.

  20. This is Charles and his teams briefing to anybody who will listen that this was all him. After weeks of headlines and inaction and outlets calling him out he’s making sure it’s clear this was all him and nobody else.

    KP seems to have briefed the same line to everybody as well,

    > The Prince of Wales was “fully supportive” of the King’s leadership on the matter, a Kensington Palace source confirmed.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/10/30/prince-andrew-to-be-stripped-all-titles-leave-royal-lodge/

    > A Kensington Palace source said: ‘The Royal Family, including the Prince of Wales, fully support the King’s leadership on this matter. These decisions have been the King’s, with the support of the wider family.’

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/galleries/article-15245167/King-strips-Andrews-title-forces-Royal-Lodge.html?ico=authors_pagination_mobile

    ETA: the Times also with the same line:

    > William, though supportive of his father’s leadership, has been more than happy for Charles to take the lead on the “Andrew problem”. A Kensington Palace source confirmed that the decisions had been those of the King, with the support of the wider family.

    https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/inside-royal-lodge-andrew-prince-title-kvtqfns06

    Charles wants full credit. Maybe because of the backlash from people rightfully calling out that he was the one who was trying to redeem Andrew.

    Camilla making sure she also gets some recognition.

    > https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15246833/Camillas-influence-King-Charles-statement-ousting-Andrew-Royal-Family.html?ico=authors_pagination_mobile

  22. Charles also briefing that he was concerned about Andrew to the times:

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/7a1316e0-9dc8-42c6-a3c9-0c796cab9209?shareToken=0fd97d483a6f0342efea1f5eafea2b8d

    > Charles is understood to have made a private telephone call to Andrew to break the news of the decision, which was only made after the King asked: “Can he cope?”

    > A royal source said: “For a while, there were significant welfare issues. His entire raison d’être revolves around status. We were asking ourselves: ‘Can he cope?’ In the end, we reached a tipping point and he was made to see sense.”

Comments are closed.