new epstein files just dropped…

Today we’re talking about the 20,000 Epstein files that got released. It’s a complicated picture involving a lot of powerful people. But let me just say right up front, this is an ongoing story. There’s a lot that’s going to be released in the coming days. So, just understand, we’re going to do our best to explain what has been happening because this story has been full of twists and turns. It starts with the Democrats releasing three emails from the Jeffrey Epstein estate. One says that the dog that hasn’t barked is Trump. A victim spent hours at my house with him. Another says the victim, Mara Lago. Trump says he asked me to resign. Never a member ever. Jeffrey Epstein. Of course, he knew about the girls as he asked Galain Maxwell to stop. And then the third email is from Michael Wolf talking about Jeffrey Epstein’s association with Trump saying you can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you or if it looks like he really could win you could save him generating a debt. Basically implying the idea that Epstein would have some kind of compromising information on Trump. But that was just the start of it because then after that the GOP came out swing and they said Democrats whine about releasing the files, but they only cherrypicked when they have them to generate clickbait. You deserve the full truth. And then they released over 20,000 files. Some of it had to do with Trump, some of it didn’t. Importantly, two of the emails that were in there were some of the ones that the Democrats released, except they were unredacted in the GOP copy. And these lack of redactions are obviously very intentional. So, we see first, I want you to realize the dog that hasn’t barked is Trump. And then it says, Virginia spent hours at my house with him. Now, that name is really important because it’s Virginia Ju. She was the Prince Andrew accuser. But importantly, she did not accuse Trump. Rather saying that he couldn’t have been friendlier. This obviously is one of the main reasons the GOP appears to have released this because in part they’re implying that hey if you release this redacted people are going to speculate who this victim was thinking that there was something that happened but actually the person that’s in there didn’t accuse Trump of something illegal. And so this is sort of the implication here with the Democrats saying well you’re you’re unredacting a victim’s name. So that’s been the battle there. Specifically the second email by the way just further confirms it. It says blank worked at Mara Lago. She was one of the ones that accused Prince Andrew. In the Democrat copy, all of that was redacted because of course it gives away the fact that we are talking about once again Virginia Duayra. Also in these emails released by the Republicans, it says blank worked at Mara Lago. Trump knew of it, came to my house many times. He never got a massage. That’s straight from Jeffrey Epstein clearing him of a massage, which obviously is the one person you most don’t want to get a massage from. So honestly, that is good for him, which is obviously why they released it. Begging the question why they didn’t release it sooner. Maybe it’s because they didn’t want people to know that Trump knew about the girls. Now, one thing I want to talk about is the fact that Epstein is saying, “Hey, look, Trump publicly said that it was me that he asked to stop, but actually it was Gain that he asked to stop.” And my question here is if it is Maxwell that was the one who poached Virginia Du Fray from Mara Lago and then trafficked her, then why is she getting so much special treatment? I mean, that is the part where the Republicans don’t look good at all. I mean, what what is going on with Galain Maxwell, a convicted sex offender, trying to get a pardon, getting Todd Blanch to give her a softball interview, and then she immediately gets preferential treatment. Look, we’ve been over the fact that she’s at basically a special prison in Brian, Texas, where normally someone of her status wouldn’t be allowed to go to because it’s too nice. It’s too low security. But in addition to that, new reports are saying that top officials at Camp Bryan are sick of being Maxwell’s Federal law enforcement staff working at the camp have been waiting on Maxwell hand and foot, including, by the way, reportedly she’s been given a puppy as part of the preferential treatment she’s been receiving. Overwhelmingly, Maxwell has been getting a super nice ride in all of this. This, of course, makes us all wonder once again, what do they have on Trump? I mean, what like why treat her like this if she doesn’t have something compromising in all of that? It just kind of begs some questions you probably don’t want to ask. Also very suspicious is the fact that immediately after this report came out, Trump personally called Rep. Lauren Boowart urging her to withdraw support for releasing the Epstein files. Bondi, Blanch, and Patel, we’re going to meet today about the Epstein files. This, of course, is furthering the idea. The White House has no interest in the story. I think Trump tweeted multiple times today about the Epstein hoax. Again, we’ve heard that a million times. Then the question is, why are you acting so suspicious if you have nothing to hide? Right? If you didn’t get the massage, which Epstein says, why why what are you hiding? Why why are you so worried about all this stuff coming out? By the way, press secretary Caroline Levit was actually asked about the White House pressuring people to get them not to sign for the release of the Epstein files, and her response was pretty insane. Why are White House officials then meeting with Representative Boowbert in an effort to try and get her to to not sign this petition uh calling for the release of the files? Doesn’t it show transparency that members of the Trump administration are willing to brief members of Congress whenever they please? Doesn’t that show our level of transparency? Doesn’t that show the level of transparency when we are willing to sit down with members of Congress and address their concerns? It shows transparency to try to go and block files being released on the world’s most prolific. But the fact we know about it, that’s the transparent part. It’s just insane. I mean, that’s the kind of spin we’ve expected with this story all along. That’s been part of what’s been so frustrating about all of this. Uh so, look, I want to get back to this story because there’s so many people involved here. Uh we’re just going to go through one by one. I mean, look, it’s a lot more than just Trump. Like one person that got kind of a weird stray in all of this was the fact that Epstein talked about Hillary doing naughties with Vince. Uh Vince being Vince Foster, a White House counsel. There was a rumor about Clinton and Vince having some kind of affair and then later Vince was found dead of. And this is where we see Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Wolf’s kind of symbiotic relationship. Michael Wolf is a journalist who has been prolific in all of this. Well, I struggle to call him a journalist actually because as what we’ll find, he was more like a PR guy for Epstein. But he was actually asking Epste and using Epstein for a lot of access to information because Michael Wolf actually told Jeffrey Epste, “Hey, basically, I’m interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?” And he’s talking about Trump. Epstein replies, “Do you want to be provocative?” Michael Wolf says, “Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What’s the one that pierces through? Jeffrey Epstein basically says, “Hey, you can do this softball.” That’s a Hillary problem. He would smile and then you can ask about his relationship with the electricians union and Mara Lago and out you go. Obviously hinting to the idea that he’s going to get kicked out if he asks about more sensitive subjects. Michael Wolf asks about, “Hey, what’s up with Foster?” And then he describes what that’s all about. And this brings us to Michael Wolf, who I want to spend a little bit of time here on. Although some of you may not know as much about him. You may be less interested in him. I think he’s one of sort of the worst looking people in all of this. Actually, after reading these emails, he may be the most disgusting person that comes out of that. And that’s saying a lot given what’s in here. But I want to just show you this because actually the Democrats initially released was this idea was that Michael Wolf and Epstein were basically planning how to respond to Epstein being brought up in the context of Trump. Michael Wolf says, “I hear CNN is planning to ask Trump about his relationship with you either on air or in scrum afterwards.” Epste says, “If we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?” That being interesting because it’s like, wait, were they in touch with Trump at this time? because Trump denied being in contact with Epstein basically since early 2000s. But anyway, if he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house and that gives you valuable PR or political currency, you can hang him in a way that generates a positive benefit for you. Or if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt. Of course, it is possible that when asked, he’ll say Jeffreey’s a good guy that’s gotten a raw deal and victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in the Trump regime. Now, if it doesn’t sound like PR, it might be something like blackmail to you. It’s like kind of a little bit of both. Michael Wolf is basically conspiring to generate a debt for Jeffrey Epstein from Trump who is about to become the most powerful person on the planet. So that’s really bizarre because Michael Wolf has positioned himself as sort of this truth teller about Jeffrey Epstein and oh and he’s got all these tapes that he’s going to release showing how close Trump and Epstein were. But it’s like behind the scenes he was actually kind of running PR for Epstein like which is sort of the worst thing you could have ever done. Uh this is in 2016. Michael Wolf is talking to Epstein about a Patterson book which later becomes the James Patterson Filthy Rich book. He says basically that would present some time issues if it was released too early. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. That’s not to say it shouldn’t be pursued. in a sense better to know what Patterson’s position is and a year from now be able to counter it in 2016. He’s playing like PR I’m gonna fix your reputation Jeffrey Epstein. He then says that being said if you need an immediate counter to the book I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It’s a chance to make the story about something other than you while at the same time letting you frame your own story. also becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover, which you decidedly don’t have now. And so again, we get the idea of him kind of scheming to get Epstein cover, which is so bad because now Michael Wolf is like, “Oh, we’re the guy exposing Trump’s connections to Epstein.” It’s like, “Buddy, what are your connections to Epstein?” Then we have later them discussing a lawsuit against Epstein and Donald Trump with a woman claiming that she was Michael Wolf responds, “Well, I guess if there’s anyone who can wave this away, it’s Donald. Let me know if there’s anything I can do.” Again, why are you trying to do something for a man accused of these things? It really seems like Michael Wolf was kind of running cover here. Now, I also want to talk about the Prince Andrew Trump scandal that appears to have been brewing here, or at least is implied in the emails. You may see some people say that Epstein met Trump and Prince Andrew back in 2019, which of course would be well after Trump said they had no contact, which would be bad news for Trump. In fact, there’s a few things in here which suggest that Epstein had contact with Trump. Of course, we don’t know for sure. I’ll just present you the evidence we do have. So, this is back in 2019, June 3rd. They’re talking about London, about London real estate, about how financials are going to leave. Then Epstein says once they are gone, the monarchy is dependable. Saying Prince Andrew and Trump today, too funny. And this is actually the same day that Trump and Andrew are spotted in London, of course, meeting together. Jeffrey Epstein says, “Recall Prince Andrew’s accuser came out of Mara Lago, Virginia Duy.” Then we have a sender that’s blacked out, but I think there’s strong evidence that it’s Steve Bannon, by the way, just to give you some context. They say, “Can’t believe nobody is making you the connective tissue.” So, the connective tissue between these two being Epstein. And then Epstein replies, “F and B only.” Now later, Jeffrey Epstein says, “Report from London. Donald now thinks he’s king. Ivanka a princess. He doesn’t need advisors.” Bannon says, “Yep, London trip not good. He had a gleam in his eye.” Of course, this hinting at the idea that Epstein was there if he got a report from London, if he’s talking about Prince Andrew and Trump, or that’s how people are coming to that conclusion at least. And then we have the thread that makes us know this is Steve Bannon, which is he gives a link where it says Steve Bannon believes Trump obstructed justice. Michael Wolf says he says BBC crushed him. He should give it up. The book is going to be a stiff. I don’t know if he senses that. Epstein replies, “Unfortunately, I do know his comments have encouraged some to look to you for answers.” This all being about an article about Steve Bannon, obviously. And then Steve Bannon says, “Burke says, “I have zero to worry about.” Now, if you don’t know who Burke is, he’s a lawyer who previously defended Steve Bannon. Epste then replies, “Good, but unnecessary. Should I call Mike, Michael Wolf?” Bannon says, “What are you going to say to him? He’s a wild animal caught in a trap.” Epstein says, “Catch his breath.” Bannon says, “Tell him to lay off me. It’s both not working and not helping.” Okay, done. Again, this is all in the context of Michael Wolf talking about Steve Bannon and then he says, “Hey, tell him to back off.” This is furthering the idea that Epstein, Bannon, Michael Wolf, they all had a close relationship, which is mostly public knowledge, but we see exactly how close. Now, in addition to this, I also wanted to note this very strange interaction between these two where Epstein sends a news article about George Nater being basically caught up in some child pornography charges. And then Bannon says not cool. Epste mandatory minimum 15. Bannon says MBZ must have coughed him up. How did he get extradited? Could have stayed in UAE forever. Epstein says he was not extradited. He was duped. Bannon, WTF, Epstein, there is his bail hearing today. Currently in Brooklyn, doesn’t look good. Pre-trial detention. Now, I personally found it strange that they were so concerned about the fate of someone caught up in such horrible charges. Uh, we’ll also talk about the Thanksgiving message. This one got a lot of attention, which is that Epstein was going to Thanksgiving, and he was asked, “Where are you having Thanksgiving?” He says, “Eva.” This lady, Faith Kates, replies, “He’s such a snooze. Who else is down there?” He replies, “David Fizzle, Hansen, Trump.” And once again, Trump claims that he was not in contact with Jeffrey Epstein after the early 2000s. He said, “Hey, I cut him off. I realized he was a bad guy.” And if Epstein’s having Thanksgiving with him, that’s obviously a problem. Now, I don’t have any public confirmation for that outside of these emails, which are basically talking about it, implying it. Once again, the same is true of Prince Andrew. Do you actually think these emails are about him actually seeing them or is he just reporting on it? It’s it’s kind of hard to know, but I just want you to know what’s out there. You also should know about the foreign governments that Epstein was working with. In one email, you have Jeffrey Epstein talking about advising a Russian ambassador. He says Churkin was great. He understood Trump after our conversations. It’s not complex. And Churkin was a Russian ambassador at the time until he died. And then you also have Israel. There are a bunch of public reports about Israel being implicated with Epstein, how spies stayed with him at the time, and some of them even met at Epstein’s house. And then you also have some emails between Epstein and a UAE royal, a sultan. So EP Epstein was he was rubbing shoulders with the top the top cream of the crop of our society. I mean, I don’t think that should come as a a shock. Uh we should also probably talk about Larry Summers. Uh he was in an article mogul donor gives Harvard more than money. And then he is in emails with Larry Summers where Epstein tells him when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of DC. So while and then Larry Summers said I am trying to figure out why American elite think if you murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be irrelevant to your admission at Harvard but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network or think tank. Do not repeat this insight. Oops. Now everybody has it. So there you go. I mean that’s a high-level snapshot of what we saw in this release. Lots of people being implicated in one way or another. It’s quite varied. I mean you know some people you find out they’ve been playing a journalist but have been secretly running PR cover for Epstein like well after you know you kind of knew he was implicated in a lot of this stuff. Other people like Clinton are catching strays on, you know, affairs that they were having. Trump gets a mixed bag where initially the implication that he was kind of given was revealed to be not quite correct because they’re talking about Virginia Duy. Although it still is a mystery why he’s behaving so strangely regarding Gain Maxwell, why he’s trying extensively to block the Epstein files. I’m not going to pretend I have all the answers. Instead, I just want to break down what we do know so far. As always, we’ve all been just looking to get to the end of this thing so we can all move on. It’s been amazing how slow they have dripped this thing out. I mean, they have been slow rolling it this whole time. So, I will update you when we have

support: https://www.patreon.com/coffeezilla

disclaimer (updated May 2025): voidzilla is an opinion‑driven channel that comments on the news of the day under the satirical and rhetorically hyperbolic banner “CRIME IS LEGAL.” the phrase critiques what we see as a lax or uneven regulatory enforcement environment for fraud. unlike our affiliated channel Coffeezilla, which conducts detailed investigations and source‑document deep dives, and draws opinions from that, voidzilla offers rapid‑fire commentary and criticism on information already in the public domain. statements here reflect the host’s views at the moment of recording and may become outdated as facts evolve. references to “crime,” “fraud,” “scam,” or similar terms appear in a rhetorical hyperbolic context similar to “CRIME IS LEGAL.” unless we expressly state that a court has entered a final judgment, no segment should be read as a definitive finding of legal liability. viewers are urged to consult primary sources and form independent conclusions. production of this program is public‑interest commentary protected by the First Amendment and the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA).

anyone featured in this program who believes a material error has occured may contact our business email with supporting documentation under the SUBJECT: “CORRECTION REQUEST”. we will promptly review substantiated notices and, where appropriate, issue corrections or updates.

31 comments
  1. Every comment I see has a one sided opinion or statement and the comments under it have a half and half political bias. The whole point seems to be misunderstood. It’s both sides trying to cover their asses and blame the other. It’s not red vs blue, it’s economic class. Racists are on both sides. Sexists are on both sides. Even PDFs are on every spectrum. The French has had revolutions from reasonably less. Why are we ok with this? Aside from being “comfortable enough”. Wake up America

  2. Look I ain't a massive Trump fan but it sounds to me that this creature known as Epstein was trying to get dirt on Trump not that he has dirt on Trump. Which baffles the heck out of me. The only answer i can even remotely come up with is Trump is protecting someone on the list that does have dirt on him.

  3. Am I the only one that feels like theres been a whole lot of smoke and mirrors that have given time insiders to doctor the emails and redacted info to make it build a better narrative on trumps involvement? is there even any way to know if the files have been edited? was the redacted content done before the previous release done in a way to create enough space ot change crucial parts once the recent release was done? i genuinely dont know and dont understand, but something is fishy!

  4. They should've honestly succeeded on January 6th so the government could go in full on crisis mode and have the files released by now. What the hell is this? We release the files, we have the files, we have some of the files, there are no files, here are 23k files, they made it up, oops never mind here are 20k again.. Everyone thinks Americans are a bit dumb but I think our government is top of the ladder here

  5. I can’t even follow this shit anymore. They are all weird. We all knew they were, this obsession with the receipts indicates a larger problem.

  6. I call BS on this, literally they waited until AFTER the shutdown to release these. Not the day Trump got into office, not when he was running— therefor I have to discredit this file dump as it's worthless, they are just trying to draw attention away from the (D)iddycrats who STILL voted to keep the government closed.

  7. To me it looks like they desperately tried to involve themselves with Trump, just to blackmail him later. But Trump didn't take the bate.

  8. these files were clearly edited before release.. there's no way they would make such a fuss about them being a hoax or nonexistent if it's just this. you're just reading scraps and leftovers of what they deemed okay to release smh

  9. This is kind of hilarious because when I watched interviews with Michael Wolff had the overwhelming feeling that he was running cover for himself and try to make himself look good before I potentially the files were released. And now fast Forward they have basically throwing them under the bus, which is just a great example of what these people are like. At the end of the day they will all rat on each other to cover their own arses and there is no loyalty amongst thieves. The tares in the wheat are exposed.

  10. Remember when trump said "Thousand points of light what was that about" in his speech talking about bush? Its trump warning the dems that he knows..

    "Thousand points of light" – bush

    Remember when Bush would say this in his speech? He is referring to a place in Belgium named The Château des Amerois… this place was the hub for the masons and supposably luciferians where they would have "The most dangerous game" aka hunting partys with children and ritual abuse. This is the same location where the famous PDF Marc Dutroux was getting paid to take children to.. a lot of government officials war involved and Thousands of people took to the streets rioting over this when Marc was charged and the truth started to come out. There is a room inside The Château des Amerois that they have called "The room of a thousand points of light" this is the room where they say ritual abuse takes place and much worse.

    Now let's talk about the Bush family.. both Bush and Bush jr have always been involved with secret societies.. they both were members of Skull & Bones secret society in college and also both use to attend bohemian grove secret society meetings. They had multiple camps inside bohemian grove with specific names for each camp where high officials would be put into groups and would have kids shuttled in supposedly.

    Not just that but legends say that alistair crowley married a woman from the bush family.. quite the coincidence wouldn't you say?

    The Château des Amerois is a huge castle in Belgium where are the highest freemasons would meet to do this ritual abuse for power and much more.

    Now let's talk about hillary clinton's laptop disappearing. Remember when the picture of hillary clinton with the kids skin on her face was a rumor and then she completely scrubbed her computer of all emails and records before they could get them?? Most people would've gone to prison for doing that but not Hillary.. now ask your self why. Well, it's because there are way more government people involved in these rings than you would ever expect.

    All you have to do is research this stuff. Bush was happily saying this stuff, not knowing in the future We would be able to discover these things from past videos with the internet being created.. whoops lol

    If you're interested in this check out a channel called "the paranormal files" he has made 2 videos and actually traveled to Château des Amerois and goes into extreme detail with court cases and everything.

    1. I suggest first watching his Bohemian grove video to open your mind to start connecting the dots and knowing how this all works

    2. Watch both Château des Amerois videos and you will fully be able to see what is happening.

  11. Corruption is not bad. Corruption is only bad if I'm not involved. Yes. But if I'm part of that corruption, I'll defend it.

Comments are closed.