Concerns have been raised about the impact on the children conceived through sperm donation. Some will be happy, others can be profoundly distressed by the double discovery of being made with donor sperm and being one of hundreds of half-siblings.
The same is true of donors, who often have no idea their sperm is being so widely distributed.
These risks are amplified by readily available DNA ancestry tests and social media where people can search for their children, siblings or the donor. In the UK, there is no longer anonymity for sperm donors and there is an official process through which children learn the identity of their biological father.
Mr Schou at Cryos argues more restrictions on sperm donation would just lead families to “turn to the private, totally unregulated, market”.
Dr John Appleby, a medical ethicist at Lancaster University, said the implications of using sperm so widely was a “vast” ethical minefield.
He said there are issues around identity, privacy, consent, dignity and more – making it a “balancing act” between competing needs.
Dr Appleby said the fertility industry had a “responsibility to get a handle on the number of times a donor is used”, but agreeing global regulations would be undeniably “very difficult”.
He added that a global sperm donor register, which has been suggested, came with its own “ethical and legal challenges”.