Parade crash driver Paul Doyle bit man’s ear off in pub fight as dark side emerges

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/parade-crash-driver-paul-doyle-36407792

Posted by dailystar_news

25 comments

  2. To save you clicking on the link –

    Paul Greaney KC, prosecuting, said Doyle was jailed for 12 months in November 1994 for causing grievous bodily harm after biting off the ear of another man in a fight in July the previous year. When he was interviewed by police earlier this year after the parade incident, he said he had become involved in a drunken fight with sailors.

    Mr Greaney said Paul Doyle enlisted in the Royal Marines at age 19, after a short period in the Royal Engineers. He signed up for 22 years’ service but was discharged in January 1993, 22 months after enlisting.

    When Doyle was in the Royal Engineers in 1989, he committed a military offence equated to common assault and was give seven days’ detention, he said.

    The court heard in March the following year, aged 18, Doyle was fined for a minor offence of dishonesty.

    In October 1991, at the end of Paul Doyle’s 32-week training period for the Royal Marines at the Commando Training Centre in Lympstone, Devon, he had what he later described as a “scuffle” with men in a nightclub.

    He said after he was thrown out, the men were waiting for him and he “got the better of them”.

    He punched another person in the face several times and was convicted of a section 20 assault and fined by Exeter Magistrates’ Court.

    In February 1992, he was convicted of two military offences – one of using violence to a superior officer and one of conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline – and in July that year he was convicted of a military offence equivalent to criminal damage, the court heard.

  3. “I “The defendant wasn’t able to reconcile the man he had been for the past 30 years with the way he had behaved [at the Liverpool parade].

    “In the same way that no one who knew him could believe it.”

    Okayyyy

  4. I think the dark side emerged, publicly, when… say… He drove through a crowd of people? I don’t know, just spitballing here.

  5. His dark side??? You mean to tell me that intentionally driving into people wasn’t that?

  6. Just get on with it and give this guy 20 years,

  7. He was committing traffic offences on the day, before this incident.

  8. But he was a company director?!?

    He lived in a cul de sac!

    This is impossible!!

  9. Walked past this prick live. He had so many options I struggle to believe it wasn’t pre meditated. Even if it wasn’t he made the decision to harm as many people as he could. Cut him out of society.

  10. I remember people defending him running over children because someone in the crowd punched his car or something.

  11. But I thought he was a good lad that was frightened by people banging on his car?

  13. Notice how it doesn’t state his nationality or religion. Weird that.

  14. “Dark side emerges” ?!?!?!

    You’re telling me that driving into a crowd of people wasn’t your first sign that he might not be a sound bloke.

    The gymnastics the English media are pulling off to try and make this guy seem likeable are truly bizarre and really we all know why.

  17. You mean he was a cunt all along. Well, surprise surprise.

  18. Lovely fellah. Sounds like a poster boy for reform and the flag shaggers.

    I wonder if they looked a domestic abuse. It’s not beyond the realms of possibility that this ‘heed the ball’ had a foot in that camp too.

  19. This guy is an irredeemable shithouse, and for the good of society should never leave prison.

  25. I wonder if GB News will have anything to say about this “defender of the nation.”? Obviously, he was a loser incell, craving his 15 seconds of fame. Troubled family man….. fuck lowlife thug more like.

Comments are closed.