We have gotten used to Greenwashing by corporations and politicians claiming to do something about Global Warming simply by excusing their malign actions. Now we are starting to hear about greenlash, a social and political backlash against efforts to rein in emissions.
One word sums up climate politics in 2025: Greenlash
While greenlash might sound like a very American phenomenon, it actually took off in Europe. The EU was an early adopter of comprehensive climate policies, and also saw the first big wave of greenlash. That opposition was mainly driven by specific economic burdens — Germany’s plan to switch to energy-efficient heat pumps caused an uproar as homeowners worried about the costs, for example. In the United States, the greenlash gathered more fuel from Trump-style populism and the culture wars.
With a tumultuous 2025 coming to an end, dictionary editors have been digging through the lexicon for words that capture its spirit. Their picks — “AI slop,” “rage bait,” and the essentially meaningless phrase “6-7” — point to a world that’s very online, and not doing much better for it. For us at Grist, greenlash stood out as the word of the year, marking a moment when climate change was yanked off the political priority list.
Global Warming Catastrophes
Christian Aid annual report’s top 10 disasters amounted to more than $120bn in insured losses
A yearly checkup on the region documents a warmer, rainier Arctic and 200 Alaskan rivers “rusting” as melting tundra leaches minerals from the soil into waterways.
British PM Teresa May didn’t believe in Global Warming [Note: Professional Denialists deny this.] until she went walking in Switzerland and saw the melting glaciers for herself. Ötzi the Iceman found in a glacier cut no ice with her.

Reconstruction
Retreating Swiss glacier spurred May’s new 2050 climate goal
The Good News
Good post Reindeer morning for gnus unwrappers & thank you GoodNewsRoundup for epic 2025 roundup &10 Amazing Things & Get Involved steps.
2025 underscored how constrained the cartel’s leverage has become. Repeated extensions of voluntary production cuts ran into a blunt reality: non‑OPEC supply—especially from the United States, Brazil, Guyana, and Canada—continued to grow, while demand expectations were repeatedly revised down on weaker industrial activity and efficiency gains.
The net result was a year in which oil prices often failed to respond durably to OPEC+ announcements, reinforcing a shift
to one where diversified production and slower demand growth dilute cartel influence.
Wars in Europe and the Middle East, Red Sea shipping disruptions, and recurring headline risk from key producers might have once guaranteed a sizable risk premium in crude. In 2025, markets largely refused to pay it.
Traders focused on tepid demand growth in China and Europe, improving fuel efficiency, and a structural expectation that supply disruptions would be met by spare capacity and nimble U.S. producers.
🛢️🛢️📉♻️♻️
🎩 2thanks
Breakthrough New Material Brings Affordable, Sustainable Future Within Grasp
University of Houston. (New to 2thanks, but it’s from September 2024)
Baby steps. This will require standing up a new supply chain for a new industry.

New material, sodium vanadium phosphate, improves sodium-ion battery performance
While lithium-ion batteries have been the go-to technology for everything from smartphones and laptops to electric cars, there are growing concerns about the future because lithium is relatively scarce, expensive and difficult to source, and may soon be at risk due to geopolitical considerations. Scientists around the world are working to create viable alternatives.
An international team of interdisciplinary researchers, including the Canepa Research Laboratory at the University of Houston, has developed a new type of material for sodium-ion batteries that could make them more efficient and boost their energy performance — paving the way for a more sustainable and affordable energy future.
The new material, sodium vanadium phosphate with the chemical formula NaxV2(PO4)3, improves sodium-ion battery performance by increasing the energy density—the amount of energy stored per kilogram—by more than 15%. With a higher energy density of 458 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg) compared to the 396 Wh/kg in older sodium-ion batteries, this material brings sodium technology closer to competing with lithium-ion batteries.
Image: Vanadium oxidation states. Uploaded by houyhnhnm.
India Advances Self-Reliance In Energy Storage With Validation Of Homegrown Sodium-Ion Cells
According to a statement from the Ministry of Science and Technology, ARCI, an autonomous research and development centre under the Department of Science and Technology, has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Voltasun Technologies Pvt. Ltd. for the validation and potential commercialisation of sodium-ion pouch cells made using Sodium Vanadium Phosphate cathode powder material .
This could be good news, if the wonks in question convince Google to use only renewable energy for their data centers, and to have the renewables working before they turn on the computers, and to use heat pumps for cooling water. But check out Google under “Denial” below.
Heatmap: Google Is Cornering the Market on Energy Wonks  Â
The hyperscaler is going big on human intelligence to help power its artificial intelligence.
Bloomberg e-mail:
Investors have piled into climate-friendly assets this year despite policy and regulatory rollbacks in the US and Europe, as artificial intelligence drives a boom in energy infrastructure demand.
Global green bond and loan issuance has reached a record $947 billion so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence. That’s as stock market gauges for renewables are set for their first annual gains since 2020, outperforming the S&P 500 by a wide margin, while shares of power-grid technology companies remain in favor.
The flows are notable in a year when US President Donald Trump backed fossil fuels and dismantled clean-energy subsidies and legislation. Europe also has rolled back some of its toughest environmental rules amid concerns about growth and competitiveness.
Another Bloomberg e-mail:
The International Court of Justice issued a first-of-its-kind ruling in favor of climate action, which promises to transform the way that NGOs and campaigners hold governments to account. In July, the court determined that countries risk being in violation of international law if they don’t work towards keeping global warming to the 1.5C threshold agreed upon at the Paris climate conference in 2015.
Yale Climate Connections:Â
Coming soon: More climate change coverage
In 2026, we’ll continue delivering our people-first reporting on extreme weather in both English and Spanish, making lifesaving information available to people in both languages. We’ll be covering the continued rise of renewable energy, the communities that are building resilience, and the people who will never give up on fighting for a safe climate.
We’ll also be keeping close tabs on the midterm elections and the Trump administration’s attacks on climate science, reporting – without euphemism – what other news organizations can’t or won’t tell you.  Â
And we have some exciting things in the works for the new year – which, with your help, we hope to make a reality.
Here’s a peek at a few of them:
Continuing to expand our radio network, reaching more Americans in rural and red states with the truth about climate change
Expanding our outreach on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube, helping more young people get the facts
Piloting an extreme weather alert project that gets lifesaving guidance to people during heat waves
Another Bloomberg e-mail:Â “All of the above” switches sides
An “all of the above” energy strategy was Republicans’ default position for years, even as it acted as a shield to protect fossil fuel interests. But they’ve largely abandoned it as President Donald Trump has remade the party into one of full-throated support for fossil fuels.
Now, Democrats are trying “all of the above” on for size, using it to position themselves as the party of affordability.
The governor-elect of Virginia, Abigail Spanberger, ran on an all-of-the-above energy policy in the country’s top location for power-hungry data centers. Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro calls himself “an all-of-the-above energy governor” while running a key swing state. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul’s recent embrace of natural gas is part of her plan to boost “reliable and clean” power, in a textbook example of all of the above.
Biden pushed both oil, to cripple OPEC; and renewables, to replace coal, oil, and gas. Now even Saudi Arabia reluctantly endorsed ending the burning of fossil fuels at COP30, although without using the words.
No New Nukes
I have a better deal for you—a bridge, real cheap, already built and carrying traffic.
Denial and Obstruction vs. Resistance and $$Real Money$$™
a
Why 2026 Could Be the Year of Expensive Natural Gas
Almost half of home heating is done with natural gas, and around 40% — the plurality — of our electricity is generated with natural gas. Data center developers are pouring billions into natural gas power plants built on-site to feed their need for computational power. In its -260 degree Fahrenheit liquid form, the gas has attracted tens of billions of dollars in investments to export it abroad.
Is this Exxon’s new climate delay tactic? | Zero: The Climate Race
A Different Level of Idiocy
Data Centers and Natural Gas Are Bending the Climate Transition Curve, IEA Says
All of this is mirrored in the International Energy Agency’s 2025 World Energy Outlook, released Wednesday, which reflects a stark portrait of how America’s development of artificial intelligence and natural gas has made it distinct from its global peers. In combination, the effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the U.S.’s world-leading artificial intelligence development have meaningfully altered the group’s forecasts of global fossil fuel usage and emissions.
Much of the report compares two different scenarios for global energy usage and emissions — one looking at what governments are actually doing, and the other at what they say they want to do. The difference between the two is in the pace of the renewables buildout, and especially the pace at which fossil fuels’ place in the energy supply is wound down, if it is at all.
The group’s latest World Energy Outlook reflects the sharp swerve in U.S. policy over the past year.