Rolnick, D. et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 1–96 (2022).
Villalobos, P. et al. Machine learning model sizes and the parameter gap. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.02852 (2022).
Wu, C.-J., Acun, B., Raghavendra, R. & Hazelwood, K. Beyond efficiency: scaling AI sustainably. IEEE Micro 44, 37–46 (2024).
Powering intelligence: analyzing artificial intelligence and data center energy consumption. White Paper on Technology Innovation Report EPRI https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002028905 (2024).
Davenport, C. et al. AI, data centers and the coming US power demand surge. Equity research report. Goldman Sachs https://www.goldmansachs.com/pdfs/insights/pages/generational-growth-ai-data-centers-and-the-coming-us-power-surge/report.pdf (2024).
O’Donnell, J. & Crownhart, C. We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard. MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116327/ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/ (2025).
Electricity 2024. International Energy Agency https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2024 (2024).
Shehabi, A. et al. 2024 United States data center energy usage report. LBNL-2001637 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https://escholarship.org/uc/item/32d6m0d1 (2024).
2024 environmental report. Google https://sustainability.google/reports/google-2024-environmental-report/ (2024).
Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A. & Ren, S. Making AI less “thirsty”: uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models. Commun. ACM 68, 54–61 (2025).
Chien, A. A., Zhang, C. & Lin, L. Beyond PUE: flexible datacenters empowering the cloud to decarbonize. In Workshop on Sustainable Computer Systems 2022 USENIX HotCarbon https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10400420 (USENIX, 2022).
Tomlinson, B., Torrance, A. W. & Ripple, W. J. Scientists’ warning on technology. J. Clean. Prod. 434, 140074 (2024).
Wang, J. et al. Designing cloud servers for lower carbon. In Proc. 51st Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA ‘24) (ACM/IEEE, 2024).
Virginia electricity profile 2024. United States Energy Information Administration https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/virginia/ (2025).
Gupta, U. et al. Chasing carbon: the elusive environmental footprint of computing. IEEE Micro 42, 37–47 (2022).
Xiao, T., Nerini, F. F., Matthews, H. D., Tavoni, M. & You, F. Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artificial intelligence servers in the USA. Nat. Sustain. 8, 1541–1553 (2025).
Energy and AI. International Energy Agency https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai (2025).
Rivera, M. B., Håkansson, C., Svenfelt, Å & Finnveden, G. Including second order effects in environmental assessments of ICT. Environ. Model. Softw. 56, 105–115 (2014). This is a thematic issue on modelling and evaluating the sustainability of smart solutions.
Köhler, A. & Erdmann, L. Expected environmental impacts of pervasive computing. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 10, 831–852 (2004).
Zhao, W. X. et al. A survey of large language models. Front. Comput. Sci. 20, 2012627 (2026).
Gomes, C. et al. Computational sustainability: computing for a better world and a sustainable future. Commun. ACM 62, 56–65 (2019).
Chien, A. A. et al. Reducing the carbon impact of generative AI inference (today and in 2035). ACM SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 4, 65–72 (2024).
Lechowicz, A. et al. Online conversion with switching costs: robust and learning-augmented algorithms. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 52, 45–46 (2024).
Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS ’20) (eds Larochelle, H. et al.) Vol. 33, 1877–1901 (Curran Associates, 2020).
Gerke, B. F. et al. The California demand response potential study, phase 4: report on shed and shift resources through 2050. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/phase_4_dr_potential_study_final_2024-05-21.pdf (2024).
Crafts, N. Artificial intelligence as a general-purpose technology: an historical perspective. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 37, 521–536 (2021).
Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M. & Qamar, D. Artificial intelligence and corporate innovation: a review and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 188, 122264 (2023).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Wu, C.-J. et al. Sustainable AI: environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. In Proc. 5th MLSys Conf. https://proceedings.mlsys.org/paper_files/paper/2022/file/462211f67c7d858f663355eff93b745e-Paper.pdf (2022).
Patterson, D. et al. The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer 55, 18–28 (2022).
Gupta, U. et al. ACT: designing sustainable computer systems with an architectural carbon modeling tool. In Proc. 49th Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA ‘22) (eds Salapura, V. et al.) 784–799 (ACM/IEEE, 2022).
Han, L., Kakadia, J., Lee, B. C. & Gupta, U. Fair-CO2: fair attribution for cloud carbon emissions. In Proc. 52nd Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA ‘25) 646–663 (ACM/IEEE, 2025).
Lisa Li, Y. et al. Fair, practical, and efficient carbon accounting for LLM serving. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 53, 99–103 (2025).
Han, L., Lisa Li, Y. & Gupta, U. Metrics for data center embodied carbon. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 53, 90–92 (2025).
Lee, B. C. et al. A view of the sustainable computing landscape. Patterns 6, 101296 (2025).
Kline, D. et al. GreenChip: a tool for evaluating holistic sustainability of modern computing systems. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 22, 322–332 (2019).
Eeckhout, L. Focal: A first-order carbon model to assess processor sustainability. In Proc. 29th ACM Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS ’24) (eds Abu-Ghazaleh, N. et al.) Vol. 2, 401–415 (ACM, 2024).
GreenSKU-Model. GitHub https://github.com/Azure/AzurePublicDataset (2026).
Li, S. et al. McPAT: an integrated power, area, and timing modeling framework for multicore and manycore architectures. In Proc. 42nd Ann. Int. Symp. Microarchitecture (MICRO 42) 469–480 (ACM/IEEE, 2009).
Binkert, N. et al. The gem5 simulator. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 39, 1–7 (2011).
Li, S., Chen, K., Ahn, J. H., Brockman, J. B. & Jouppi, N. P. CACTI-P: architecture-level modeling for SRAM-based structures with advanced leakage reduction techniques. In Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) 694–701 (ACM/IEEE, 2011).
Garcia Bardon, M. et al. DTCO including sustainability: power–performance–area–cost–environmental score (PPACE) analysis for logic technologies. In Proc. Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 41.4.1–41.4.4 (IEEE, 2020).
Tannu, S. & Nair, P. J. The dirty secret of SSDs: embodied carbon. SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 3, 4–9 (2022).
Sudarshan, C. C., Matkar, N., Vrudhula, S., Sapatnekar, S. S. & Chhabria, V. A. ECO-CHIP: estimation of carbon footprint of chiplet-based architectures for sustainable VLSI. In Int. Symp. High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 671–685 (IEEE, 2024).
Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y. K., Wan, C. & Lin, Y. C. 3D-carbon: an analytical carbon modeling tool for 3D and 2.5D integrated circuits. In Proc. 61st Design Automation Conf. (DAC ’24) (ACM/IEEE, 2024).
Acun, B. et al. Carbon Explorer: a holistic approach for designing carbon aware datacenters. In Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems 118–132 (ACM, 2023).
Li, Y. et al. Ecoserve: designing carbon-aware AI inference systems. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.05043 (2025).
IMEC netzero virtual fab. IMEC https://netzero.imec-int.com/ (2024).
Falk, S. et al. More than carbon: cradle-to-grave environmental impacts of GenAI training on the Nvidia A100 GPU. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 121, 108525 (2026).
Chen, X., Han, L., Bhagavathula, A. & Gupta, U. CarbonClarity: understanding and addressing uncertainty in embodied carbon for sustainable computing. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Aided Design (ICCAD) 1–9 (ACM/IEEE, 2025).
Bhagavathula, A., Han, L. & Gupta, U. Understanding the implications of uncertainty in embodied carbon models for sustainable computing. HotCarbon https://hotcarbon.org/assets/2024/pdf/hotcarbon24-final146.pdf (2024).
Ning, A., Tziantzioulis, G. & Wentzlaff, D. Supply chain aware computer architecture. In Proc. 50th Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA ’23) 17 (ACM/IEEE, 2023).
Elsworth, C. et al. Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google scale. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.15734 (2025).
Chung, J.-W. et al. The ML.ENERGY Benchmark: Toward Automated Inference Energy Measurement and Optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 (NeurIPS, 2025).
Schneider, I. et al. An introduction to life-cycle emissions of AI hardware. IEEE Micro 45, 9–19 (2025).
Schneider, I. et al. An Introduction to Life-Cycle Emissions of Artificial Intelligence Hardware. IEEE Micro 45, 10–22 (2025).
Luccioni, S., Jernite, Y. & Strubell, E. Power hungry processing: watts driving the cost of AI deployment? In Proc. Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 85–99 (ACM, 2024).
Morrison, J. et al. Holistically evaluating the environmental impact of creating language models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.05804 (2025).
Patterson, D. et al. Recovery-oriented computing (ROC): motivation, definition, techniques, and case studies. Technical Report. ACM Digital Library https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/894137 (2002).
Patterson, D. et al. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.10350 (2021).
Wang, J. STAR-Research: GreenSKU-Model: ISCA artifact. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10896255 (2024).
Tomlinson, B., Black, R. W., Patterson, D. J. & Torrance, A. W. The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans. Sci. Rep. 14, 3732 (2024).
Ren, S., Tomlinson, B., Black, R. W. & Torrance, A. W. Reconciling the contrasting narratives on the environmental impact of large language models. Sci. Rep. 14, 26310 (2024).
Panteleaki, A. M. et al. Carbon-Efficient 3D DNN Acceleration: Optimizing Performance and Sustainability. In Proc. 2025 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI 1–6 (IEEE, 2025).
Fayza, F. et al. Photonics for sustainable AI. Commun. Phys. 8, 403 (2025).
Elgamal, M. et al. Cordoba: carbon-efficient optimization framework for computing systems. In 31st Int. Symp. High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 1289–1303 (IEEE, 2025).
Byun, H. J., Gupta, U. & Seo, J.-S. 3D IC architecture evaluation and optimization with digital compute-in-memory designs. In Proc. 29th Int. Symp. Low Power Electronics and Design 1–6 (ACM/IEEE, 2024).
Byun, H. J., Gupta, U. & Seo, J.-S. Energy-/carbon-aware evaluation and optimization of 3D IC architecture with digital compute-in-memory designs. IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 10, 98–106 (2024).
Fayza, F. et al. Epicarbon: a carbon modeling tool for electro-photonic accelerators. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer-aided Design 1–9 (IEEE, 2025).
Wu, H. et al. COFFEE: a carbon-modeling and optimization framework for HZO-based FeFET eNVMs. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.05018 (2026).
Software carbon intensity (SCI) specification. Green Software Foundation https://sci.greensoftware.foundation/ (2024).
Gao, J., Wang, H. & Shen, H. Smartly handling renewable energy instability in supporting a cloud datacenter. In Proc. Int. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. 769–778 (IEEE, 2020).
Chen, G. et al. Energy-aware server provisioning and load dispatching for connection-intensive internet services. In Proc. 5th USENIX Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ‘08) 337–350 (USENIX Association, 2008).
Delimitrou, C. & Kozyrakis, C. Quasar: resource-efficient and QoS-aware cluster management. In Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS ‘14) 127–144 (ACM, 2014).
Wu, Q. et al. Dynamo: Facebook’s data center-wide power management system. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 44, 469–480 (2016).
Urgaonkar, R., Kozat, U. C., Igarashi, K. & Neely, M. J. Dynamic resource allocation and power management in virtualized data centers. In Proc. Network Operations and Management Symp. (NOMS 2010) 479–486 (IEEE, 2010).
Kumbhare, A. G. et al. Prediction-Based Power Oversubscription in Cloud Platforms. In Proc. 2021 USENIX Annual Technical Conference 473–487 (USENIX Association, 2021).
Zhang, C. et al. Flex: high-availability datacenters with zero reserved power. In Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA) 319–332 (ACM/IEEE, 2021).
Patel, P. et al. Towards improved power management in cloud GPUs. Comput. Arch. Lett. 22, 141–144 (2023).
Lyu, J. et al. Myths and misconceptions around reducing carbon embedded in cloud platforms. In Proc. 2nd Worksh. Sustainable Computer Systems (HotCarbon ‘23) 7 (ACM, 2023).
Zhao, J. et al. Galore: memory-efficient LLM training by gradient low-rank projection. In Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML’24) (eds Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) 2528 (JMLR, 2024).
Abdin, M. et al. Phi-3 technical report: a highly capable language model locally on your phone. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14219 (2024).
Mazumder, M. et al. Dataperf: benchmarks for data-centric AI development. In Proc. 37th Int. Conf. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS ’23) (eds Oh, A. et al.) 235 (Curran Associates, 2023).
Griggs, T. et al. Mélange: cost efficient large language model serving by exploiting GPU heterogeneity. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14527 (2024).
Patel, P. et al. Splitwise: efficient generative LLM inference using phase splitting. In Proc. 51st Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA) 118–132 (ACM/IEEE, 2024).
Li, Y. L., Graif, O. & Gupta, U. Towards carbon-efficient LLM life cycle. In Proc. 3rd Workshop Sustain. Comput. Syst. (HotCarbon ‘24) (ACM, 2024).
Naffziger, S. et al. Pioneering chiplet technology and design for the amd epyc™ and ryzen™ processor families: industrial product. In 48th Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA) 57–70 (ACM/IEEE, 2021).
Pentecost, L. et al. Maxnvm: maximizing dnn storage density and inference efficiency with sparse encoding and error mitigation. In Proc. 52nd Ann. Int. Symp. Microarchitecture (MICRO ’52) 769–781 (ACM/IEEE, 2019).
Cortez, E. et al. Resource central: understanding and predicting workloads for improved resource management in large cloud platforms. In Symp. Operating Systems Principles https://doi.org/10.1145/3132747.3132772 (ACM, 2017).
Connatser, M. AMD adds 128-core Bergamo and 3D V-Cache Genoa CPUs to Zen 4 Epyc lineup. XDA https://www.xda-developers.com/amd-128-core-bergame-genoa-epyc-cpu/ (2023).
Sharma, D. D., Blankenship, R. & Berger, D. S. An Introduction to the Compute Express Link (CXL) interconnect. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 290 (2024).
Larabel, M. AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo Review. phoronix https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9754-bergamo (2023).
Long term reliability assessment, january 2026. Tech. Rep. North American Electric Reliability Corporation https://www.nerc.com/globalassets/our-work/assessments/nerc_ltra_2025.pdf (2026).
FERC directs nation’s largest grid operator to create new rules to embrace innovation and protect consumers. FERC (2025).
Mills, D. Board decisional letter on critical issue fast path — large load additions. PJM https://www.pjm.com/-/media/DotCom/about-pjm/who-we-are/public-disclosures/2026/20260116-pjm-board-letter-re-results-of-the-cifp-process-large-load-additions.pdf (2026).
Ebeed, M., Kamel, S. & Jurado, F. In Classical and Recent Aspects of Power System Optimization (eds Zobaa, A. F., Abdel Aleem, S. H. & Abdelaziz, A. Y.) Ch. 7, 157–183 (Academic, 2018).
Greatest engineering accomplishments of the 20th century. NAE http://www.greatachievements.org/ (2006).
Monthly outlook for resource adequacy (MORA) reporting month: July 2026. ERCOT https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2026/05/01/MORA_July2026.pdf (2026).
Miso business process manual manual no. 011 business practices manual resource adequacy. MISO https://cdn.misoenergy.org/BPM-011%20Resource%20Adequacy110405.zip?v=20260311160104 (2023).
CAISO. Monthly renewables performance reports 2026. California ISO https://www.caiso.com/library/monthly-renewables-performance-reports-2026 (2026).
Wiser, R. H., Mills, A. D., Seel, J., Levin, T. & Botterud, A. Impacts of variable renewable energy on bulk power system assets, pricing, and costs. Tech. Rep. LBNL-2001082 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2017).
Chien, A. A. Characterizing opportunity power in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) in years 2015-2017. Energy Earth Sci. 3, 2 (2020).
Real time daily market watch, real-time market, march 15, 2026. California ISO https://www.caiso.com/documents/real-time-daily-market-watch-mar-15-2026.html (2026).
Millstein, D., O’Shaughnessy, E. & Wiser, R. Exploring wholesale energy price trends the renewables and wholesale electricity prices (REWEP) tool, version 2024. Berkeley Lab https://emp.lbl.gov/renewables-and-wholesale-electricity-prices-rewep (2024).
Chien, A. A. & Lin, L. As grids reach 100% renewable at peak, growing curtailment of 8 gigawatts looms as a challenge to decarbonization. SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 4, 3–10 (2024).
Acun, B. et al. Unlocking the potential of renewable energy through curtailment prediction. In Climate Change AI Workshop at NeurIPS 2023 123 (2023).
2023 special report on battery storage. CAISO https://www.caiso.com/documents/2023-special-report-on-battery-storage-jul-16-2024.pdf (2024).
Gerke, B. F. et al. The California demand response potential study, phase 3: final report on the shift resource through 2030. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https://doi.org/10.20357/B7MS40 (2020).
Yang, F. & Chien, A. A. ZCCloud: exploring wasted green power for high-performance computing. In Int. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS) 1051–1060 (IEEE, 2016).
Yang, F. & Chien, A. A. Large-scale and extreme-scale computing with stranded green power: opportunities and costs. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems 29, 1103–1116 (2017).
Putnam, M. & Perez, M. Solar potential analysis report. Minnesota Department of Commerce and the Minnesota Solar Pathways Project https://mn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/solar-potential-analysis-report.pdf (2018).
Hoza, M. Wind and solar curtailments on the rise. Factset Insight https://insight.factset.com/wind-and-solar-curtailments-on-the-rise (2023).
Data center load shape library: Electric Power Research Insitute https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002033424 (2025).
Google to invest $40 billion in new Texas datacenters. Bloomberg News https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-14/google-to-invest-40-billion-in-new-data-centers-in-texas (2025).
Swinhoe, D. & Skidmore, Z. Meta announces 4 million sq ft, 2GW Louisiana data center campus. DCD https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/meta-announces-4-million-sq-ft-louisiana-data-center-campus/ (2024).
Generational growth: AI, data centers and the coming US power demand surge. Goldman Sachs https://www.goldmansachs.com/pdfs/insights/pages/generational-growth-ai-data-centers-and-the-coming-us-power-surge/report.pdf (2024).
Norris, T., Profeta, T., Patino-Echeverri, D. & Cowie-Haskell, A. Rethinking load growth: assessing the potential for integration of large flexible loads in US power systems. Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability, Duke University https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/publications/rethinking-load-growth (2025).
Lin, L. et al. Exploding AI power use: an opportunity to rethink grid planning and management. In Proc. 15th ACM Int. Conf. Future and Sustainable Energy Systems (e-Energy ’24) 434–441 (ACM, 2024).
Lin, L. & Chien, A. A. Middlebox: unlocking datacenter growth and grid decarbonization. In Proc. Symposium Cloud Computing (SoCC ‘25) 134–148 (ACM, 2025).
Advantages and challenges of nuclear-powered data centers. United States Department of Energy https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/advantages-and-challenges-nuclear-powered-data-centers (2025).
Macknick, J., Newmark, R., Heath, G. & Hallett, K. A review of operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies. NREL https://docs.nlr.gov/docs/fy11osti/50900.pdf (2011).
Reig, P. What’s the difference between water use and water consumption? World Resources Institute Commentary https://www.wri.org/insights/whats-difference-between-water-use-and-water-consumption (2013).
Environmental sustainability report 2025. Microsoft https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability/report (2024).
Reig, P., Luo, T., Christensen, E. & Sinistore, J. Guidance for calculating water use embedded in purchased electricity. World Resources Institute https://www.wri.org/research/guidance-calculating-water-use-embedded-purchased-electricity (2020).
Siddik, M. A. B., Shehabi, A., Rao, P. & Marston, L. T. Spatially and temporally detailed water and carbon footprints of U.S. electricity generation and use. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2024WR038350 (2024).
Siddik, M. A. B., Shehabi, A. & Marston, L. The environmental footprint of data centers in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064017 (2021).
Shehabi, A. et al. United States data center energy usage report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https://eta.lbl.gov/publications/united-states-data-center-energy (2016).
Karimi, L. et al. Water-energy tradeoffs in data centers: a case study in hot-arid climates. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 181, 106194 (2022).
Frost, K. & Hua, I. Quantifying spatiotemporal impacts of the interaction of water scarcity and water use by the global semiconductor manufacturing industry. Water Resour. Ind. 22, 100115 (2019).
PUB, Singapore’s National Water Agency. Best Practice Guide in Water Efficiency: Wafer Fabrication and Semiconductor Sector https://go.nature.com/4p0UHk1 (PUB, 2022).
Han, Y., Li, P., Wierman, A. & Ren, S. Small bottle, big pipe: quantifying and addressing the impact of data centers on public water systems. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.02705 (2026).
Ahmed, S. N., Bencala, K., Nummer, S., Schultz, C. L. & Seck, A. 2025 Washington Metropolitan Area water supply study: demand and resource availability forecast for the year 2050. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin https://www.potomacriver.org/publications/2025-washington-metropolitan-area-water-supply-study-demand-and-resource-availability-forecast-for-the-year-2050/ (2025).
Water use by data centers in the Susquehanna River Basin: FAQ. Susquehanna River Basin Commission https://www.srbc.gov/about/news/docs/srbc-data-centers-faq.pdf (2025).
Hölzle, U. Our commitment to climate-conscious data center cooling. The Keyword https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/sustainability/our-commitment-to-climate-conscious-data-center-cooling/ (2022).
Google environmental report 2025. Google https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/google-2025-environmental-report.pdf (2025).
Principles for sustainable water use by data centers: building more effective public–private collaboration. Water-AI Nexus https://water-ai-nexus.org/insight-report (2025).
Our contribution to a global environmental standard for AI. Mistral AI https://mistral.ai/news/our-contribution-to-a-global-environmental-standard-for-ai (2025).
Firestone, D. et al. Azure accelerated networking: SmartNICs in the public cloud. In Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation (USENIX, 2018).
Li, H. et al. LeapIO: efficient and portable virtual NVMe storage on ARMSoCs. In Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS ‘20) (eds Larus, J. et al.) 591–605 (2020).
Liguori, A. The Nitro Project – Next-Generation EC2 Infrastructure. aws https://pages.awscloud.com/The-Nitro-Project-Next-Generation-EC2-Infrastructure_0119-CMP_OD.html (2018).
Nguyen, S., Zhou, B., Ding, Y. & Liu, S. Towards sustainable large language model serving. ACM SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 4, 134–140 (2025).
Leviathan, Y., Kalman, M. & Matias, Y. Fast inference from transformers via speculative decoding. In Proc. 40th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML ‘23) (eds Krause, A. et al.) 795 (JMLR, 2023).
Demand response. PJM https://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/demand-response (2024).
Zhang, Y., Paschalidis, I. C. & Coskun, A. K. Data center participation in demand response programs with quality-of-service guarantees. In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy ’19) 285–302 (ACM, 2019).
Sun, Q., Ren, S., Wu, C. & Li, Z. An online incentive mechanism for emergency demand response in geo-distributed colocation data centers. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy ’16) 3 (ACM, 2016).
Wierman, A., Liu, Z., Liu, I. & Mohsenian-Rad, H. Opportunities and challenges for data center demand response. In Int. Green Computing Conf. 1–10 (IEEE, 2014).
Large flexible load task force. Electric Reliability Council of Texas https://www.ercot.com/committees/inactive/lfltf (2022).
Barroso, L. A., Hölzle, U. & Ranganathan, P. The Datacenter as a Computer: Designing Warehouse-scale Machines (Springer Nature, 2026).
Investigating a higher renewables portfolio standard in California: Executive summary. Energy and Environmental Economics https://www.ethree.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/E3_Final_RPS_Report_2014_01_06_ExecutiveSummary-1.pdf (2014).
Dominion Energy Virginia. RD214 – Dominion Energy® Virginia Electric and Power Company’s Report of Its 2023 Integrated Resource Plan – May 1, 2023 https://rga.lis.virginia.gov/Published/2023/RD214 (Dominion Energy Virginia, 2023).
Generation capacity statement 2023–2032. Eir Grid and Soni https://cms.eirgrid.ie/sites/default/files/publications/19035-EirGrid-Generation-Capacity-Statement-Combined-2023-V5-Jan-2024.pdf (2024).
PJM load forecast report. PJM Resource Adequacy Planning Department https://www.pjm.com/-/media/library/reports-notices/load-forecast/2024-load-report.ashx (2024).
Lin, L. & Chien, A. A. Adapting datacenter capacity for greener datacenters and grid. In Proc. 14th ACM Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy ’23) 200–213 (ACM, 2023).
Lin, L. & Chien, A. A. Distribution and management of datacenter load decoupling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.08936 (2025).
Radovanovic, A. et al. Carbon-aware computing for datacenters. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 38, 1270–1280 (2021).
California ISO: today’s outlook. CAISO https://www.caiso.com/todays-outlook/ (2026).
Chien, A. A., Yang, F. & Zhang, C. Characterizing curtailed and uneconomic renewable power in the mid-continent independent system operator. AIMS Energy 6, 376–401 (2018).
Kim, K., Yang, F., Zavala, V. & Chien, A. A. Data centers as dispatchable loads to harness stranded power. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 8, 208–218 (2016).
Wilson, D. C. et al. An end-to-end hpc framework for dynamic power objectives. In Proc. Worksh. Int. Conf. High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis (SC-W ’23) 1801–1811 (ACM, 2023).
Norris, T. H., Profeta, T., Patino-Echeverri, D. & Cowie-Haskell, A. Rethinking load growth: assessing the potential for integration of large flexible loads in US power systems. Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability, Duke University https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/sites/default/files/publications/rethinking-load-growth.pdf (2025).
Document 32023l1791: Directive (EU) 2023/1791 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955. EurLEX https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/1791/oj/eng (2023).
I&M, Google filing to support reliability through demand response structure. Indiana Michigan Power https://www.indianamichiganpower.com/company/news/view?releaseID=10359 (2025).
Zhang, W., Roald, L. A., Chien, A. A., Birge, J. R. & Zavala, V. M. Flexibility from networks of data centers: a market clearing formulation with virtual links. Electric Power Systems Res. 189, 106723 (2020).
Lindberg, J., Abdennadher, Y., Chen, J., Lesieutre, B. C. & Roald, L. A guide to reducing carbon emissions through data center geographical load shifting. In Proc. Twelfth ACM Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy ’21) 430-436 (ACM, 2021).
Lin, L. P. Decoupling and coordination: the keys to making AI datacenters constructive loads in renewable-dominated grids. PhD thesis, Univ. Chicago http://zccloud.cs.uchicago.edu/ (2025).
Uptime institute global data center survey 2024. Uptime Institute https://datacenter.uptimeinstitute.com/rs/711-RIA-145/images/2024.GlobalDataCenterSurvey.Report.pdf (2024).
Sustainability report. Meta https://sustainability.atmeta.com/2024-sustainability-report/ (2024).
Apple’s water strategy. Apple https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apples_Water_Strategy.pdf (2025).
Gupta, P. S., Hossen, M. R., Li, P., Ren, S. & Islam, M. A. A dataset for research on water sustainability. In Proc. 15th ACM Int. Conf. Future and Sustainable Energy Systems (e-Energy ’24) 442–446 (ACM, 2024).
Wu, Y., Hua, I. & Ding, Y. Not all water consumption is equal: a water stress weighted metric for sustainable computing. SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 5, 84–90 (2025).
Van Zetten, J. D., Cholette, M. E. & Bamdad, K. Energy and carbon savings in data centres through liquid-to-chip cooling with differential temperature control. Adv. Appl. Energy 22, 100269 (2026).
Hershberg, K., Burnett, B., Roraff, J., Hopker, P. & Brune, M. The energy and water use impacts of building system design for data centers: design considerations for Oregon and Washington. PAE https://critfc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/data-center-report.pdf (2025).
Islam, M. A. et al. Exploiting spatio-temporal diversity for water saving in geo-distributed data centers. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 6, 734–746 (2018).
Islam, M. A., Ren, S., Quan, G., Shakir, M. Z. & Vasilakos, A. V. Water-constrained geographic load balancing in data centers. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2015.2453982 (2015).
Jiang, Y., Roy, R. B., Kanakagiri, R. & Tiwari, D. Waterwise: c-optimizing carbon- and water-footprint toward environmentally sustainable cloud computing. In Proc. 30th SIGPLAN Ann. Symp. Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP ’25) 297–311 (ACM, 2025).
FAQ: why does AI use water? Amazon https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/stories/just-back-from-weftec-why-does-ai-use-water (2025).
de Chalendar, J. A., Taggart, J. & Benson, S. M. Tracking emissions in the U.S. electricity system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 25497–25502 (2019).
Acun, B. et al. Carbon Explorer: a holistic framework for designing carbon aware datacenters. In Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS 2023) Vol. 2, 118–132 (ACM, 2023).
Qureshi, A., Weber, R., Balakrishnan, H., Guttag, J. & Maggs, B. Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems. In Proc. Conf. Data Communications (SIGCOMM ’09) 123–134 (ACM, 2009).
Gao, P. X., Curtis, A. R., Wong, B. & Keshav, S. It’s not easy being green. Proc. Conf. Applications, Technologies, Architectures and Protocols for Computer Communication (SIGCOMM ‘12) (eds Eggert, L. et al.) 211–222 (ACM, 2012).
Li, P., Yang, J., Wierman, A. & Ren, S. Towards environmentally equitable AI via geographical load balancing. In Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Future and Sustainable Energy Systems (e-Energy ‘24) 291–307 (ACM, 2024).
Islam, M. J. & Ren, S. Equity-aware spatial-temporal workload shifting for sustainable AI data centers. In Proc. Worksh. Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning (NeurIPS ‘24) 33 (USENIX, 2024).
Pessach, D. & Shmueli, E. A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494672 (2022).
Ahmed, K., Islam, M. A., Ren, S. & Quan, G. Can data center become water self-sufficient? In Proc. 6th Worksh. Power-Aware Computing and Systems (HotPower ‘14) (USENIX, 2014).
Chen, S., Zhou, Z., Liu, F., Li, Z. & Ren, S. Cloudheat: an efficient online market mechanism for datacenter heat harvesting. ACM Trans. Model. Perform. Eval. Comput. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1145/3199675 (2018).
Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
Carman, J. et al. Understanding Pro-Climate Voters in the United States. Research Report. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/understanding-pro-climate-voters/ (2024).
Estrin, D. L. & Millett, L. I. Computing Research for Sustainability (National Academies Press, 2012).
IPCC. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9982 (2022).
Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R. & Turner, R. K. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services 1st edn (Routledge, 2016).
UN Environment Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-6): Healthy Planet, Healthy People (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Daly, H. E. Steady-state economics. In Thinking About the Environment (eds Cahn, M. A. & O’Brien, R.) 250–255 (Routledge, 2015).
Kallis, G. In defence of degrowth. Ecol. Econ. 70, 873–880 (2011).
Köstler, L. & Ossewaarde, R. The making of AI society: AI futures frames in German political and media discourses. AI Soc. 37, 249–263 (2022).
Monbiot, G. How Do We Get Out of This Mess? The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/09/george-monbiot-how-de-we-get-out-of-this-mess (9 September 2017).
Artificial intelligence (AI). United Nations https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/artificial-intelligence (2025).
Sætra, H. S. Science fiction, sustainability, and scenario use: comprehensive scenarios for improved strategy development and innovation. Technovation 132, 102976 (2024).
Kasneci, E. et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Individ. Differ. 103, 102274 (2023).
Torrance, A. W. & Tomlinson, B. Governance of the AI, by the AI, and for the AI. Miss. Law J. 93, 107 (2023).
Filippi, D. S., Tomlinson, B. & Torrance, A. W. The law and AI as an “apex collaborator”: legal frameworks for optimized cooperation. FIU Law Rev. 20, 7 (2026).
Marcuse, H. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Beacon, 1964; reprinted Routledge, 2002).
Bodnar, C. et al. A foundation model for the Earth system. Nature 641, 1180–1187 (2025).
Recommendations on powering artificial intelligence and data center infrastructure. United States Department of Energy https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-08/Powering%20AI%20and%20Data%20Center%20Infrastructure%20Recommendations%20July%202024.pdf (2024).
Opportunities in a resource-constrained world: how business is rising to the challenge. Carbon Trust https://www.carbontrust.com/our-work-and-impact/guides-reports-and-tools/opportunities-in-a-resource-constrained-world-how-business-is-rising-to-the-challenge (2014).
Illuminating the unseen power of the cloud. Microsoft Datacenters https://datacenters.microsoft.com/ (2024).