Wang, H. et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620, 47–60 (2023).
Lam, H. Y. I. et al. Application of variational graph encoders as an effective generalist algorithm in computer-aided drug design. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 754–764 (2023).
Fang, X. et al. Geometry-enhanced molecular representation learning for property prediction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 127–134 (2022).
Chen, X. et al. Uni-electrolyte: an artificial intelligence platform for designing electrolyte molecules for rechargeable batteries. Angew. Chem. 137, e202503105 (2025).
Gong, S. et al. A predictive machine learning force-field framework for liquid electrolyte development. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 543–552 (2025).
Jiang, B. et al. Deep active learning and knowledge transfer for rapid discovery of lithium metal battery electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 17, 5146 (2026).
Kumar, R., Vu, M. C., Ma, P. & Amanchukwu, C. V. Electrolytomics: a unified big data approach for electrolyte design and discovery. Chem. Mater. 37, 2720–2734 (2025).
Yao, N., Chen, X., Fu, Z.-H. & Zhang, Q. Applying classical, ab initio, and machine-learning molecular dynamics simulations to the liquid electrolyte for rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 122, 10970–11021 (2022).
Zhang, H. et al. Learning molecular mixture property using chemistry-aware graph neural network. PRX Energy 3, 023006 (2024).
Yang, Z. et al. A unified predictive and generative solution for liquid electrolyte formulation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 8, 186–196 (2026).
Tyler, C. et al. AI tools as science policy advisers? The potential and the pitfalls. Nature 622, 27–30 (2023).
Hao, Q., Xu, F., Li, Y. & Evans, J. Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus. Nature 649, 1237–1243 (2026).
Kailkhura, B., Gallagher, B., Kim, S., Hiszpanski, A. & Han, T. Y.-J. Reliable and explainable machine-learning methods for accelerated material discovery. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 108 (2019).
Tang, Y., Tuncel, D., Koerner, C. & Runkler, T. The few-shot dilemma: over-prompting large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13196 (2025).
Kim, S. C. et al. Data-driven electrolyte design for lithium metal anodes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214357120 (2023).
Chen, C. et al. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903242 (2020).
Dudley, J. et al. Conductivity of electrolytes for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 35, 59–82 (1991).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 (Gaussian Inc., 2016).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 120, 215–241 (2007).
Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 6378–6396 (2009).
Spotte-Smith, E. W. C. et al. Quantum chemical calculations of lithium-ion battery electrolyte and interphase species. Sci. Data 8, 203 (2021).
Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).
Lu, T. A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists, Multiwfn. J. Chem. Phys. 161, 082503 (2024).
Yang Z. et al. ByteDance-Seed/bamboo_mixer: v0.0.1. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17694573 (2025).
Lai G. et al. Bamboomixer_extension. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19048302 (2026).
Lai G. et al. Recommended parameters for Bamboomixer_extension. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19876420 (2026).