Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O. & Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381, 752–762 (2013).
Fried, L. P. et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56, M146–M156 (2001).
Rockwood, K. et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 173, 489–495 (2005).
Culos, A. et al. A machine learning model for frailty based on wearable device measurements. Commun. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01419-7 (2026).
Osuka, Y., Chan, L. L. Y., Brodie, M. A., Okubo, Y. & Lord, S. R. A wrist-worn wearable device can identify frailty in middle-aged and older adults: the UK Biobank Study. J. Am. Med Dir. Assoc. 25, 105196 (2024).
Dalsania, K. A. et al. Use of conventional artificial intelligence methods in the identification of frailty: a scoping review. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70387 (2026).
Fan, S. et al. Digital health technology combining wearable gait sensors and machine learning improve the accuracy in prediction of frailty. Front Public Health 11, 1169083 (2023).
Kasper, K. A. et al. Wearable AI for on-device frailty assessment. Nat. Commun. 17, 991 (2025).
Wilkinson, D. The self-fulfilling prophecy in intensive care. Theor. Med Bioeth. 30, 401–410 (2009).
Sprung, C. L. et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 290, 790–797 (2003).
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 447–453 (2019).
Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Howell, M. D., Corrado, G. & Chin, M. H. Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Ann. Intern Med. 169, 866–872 (2018).
Wiens, J. et al. Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nat. Med 25, 1337–1340 (2019).
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J. & Schmajuk, G. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern Med 178, 1544–1547 (2018).
Bignami, E. G. et al. Wearable devices in healthcare beyond the one-size-fits all paradigm. Sens. (Basel) 25, 6472 (2025).
Doherty, C., Baldwin, M., Keogh, A., Caulfield, B. & Argent, R. Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement. Sports Med. 54, 2907–2926 (2024).
Chikwetu, L. et al. Does deidentification of data from wearable devices give us a false sense of security? A systematic review. Lancet Digit. Health 5, e239–e247 (2023).
Doherty, C., Baldwin, M., Lambe, R., Altini, M. & Caulfield, B. Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic analysis of data policies across leading manufacturers. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 363 (2025).
Cecconi, M. et al. Implementing artificial intelligence in critical care medicine: a consensus of 22. Crit. Care 29, 290 (2025).
Bignami, E. G., Russo, M., Semeraro, F. & Bellini, V. Technoethics in real life: AI as a core clinical competency. J. Anesth. Analg. Crit. Care 5, 13 (2025).
Daneshvar, N. et al. Artificial intelligence in the provision of health care: an American college of physicians policy position paper. Ann. Intern. Med. 177, 964–967 (2024).
Ferber, D. et al. Towards autonomous medical artificial intelligence agents. Nature 655, 1282–1291 (2026).
Liévin, V. et al. Towards conversational artificial intelligence for disease management. Nature 655, 1292–1299 (2026).
Canali, S., Schiaffonati, V. & Aliverti, A. Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness. PLOS Digit Health 1, e0000104 (2022).
Greco, M. et al. Wearable Health Technology for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Elderly Patients: The WELCOME Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 13, 630 (2023).
Yixiao, C., Hui, S., Quhong, S., Xiaoxi, Z. & Jirong, Y. A review of utility of wearable sensor technologies for older person frailty assessment. Exp. Gerontol. 200, 112668 (2025).
Gresham, G. et al. Wearable activity monitors to assess performance status and predict clinical outcomes in advanced cancer patients. NPJ Digit. Med. 1, 27 (2018).
Low, C. A. et al. Fitbit step counts during inpatient recovery from cancer surgery as a predictor of readmission. Ann. Behav. Med. 52, 88–92 (2018).
Lichtenstein, D. A. & Mezière, G. A. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 134, 117–125 (2008).
Platz, E. et al. Dynamic changes and prognostic value of pulmonary congestion by lung ultrasound in acute and chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Eur. J. Heart Fail 19, 1154–1163 (2017).
Kearon, C. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 149, 315–352 (2016).
Ghio, S. et al. Prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J. Cardiol. 140, 272–278 (2010).
Lang, R. M. et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 28, 1–39.e14 (2015). JanPMID: 25559473.
Bignami, E. G., Russo, M. & Bellini, V. Reclaiming patient-centered care: how intelligent time is redefining healthcare priorities. J. Med Syst. 49, 30 (2025).
Bignami, E., Darhour, L. J. & Bellini, V. Sustainable AI in medicine: navigating innovation, challenges, and environmental impact. Health Econ. Rev. 15, 110 (2025).
Bellini, V. & Bignami, E. Green artificial intelligence: pioneering sustainable innovation in health technologies. J. Perioper. Pr. 35, 586–587 (2025).
Manrai, A. K. Medical AI has a measurement problem. Nature 655, 1138–1139 (2026).
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Off. J. Eur. Union L 2024/1689 (2024).
Topol, E. J. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 25, 44–56 (2019).
Ueda, D. et al. Climate change and artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations towards a sustainable future. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.06.002 (2024).