Berdigaliyev, N. & Aljofan, M. An overview of drug discovery and development. Future Med. Chem. 12, 939–947 (2020).
Hughes, J. P., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S. B. & Philpott, K. L. Principles of early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 162, 1239–1249 (2011).
Jones, A. & Clifford, L. Drug discovery alliances. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 807–808 (2005).
Zhu, T. et al. Hit identification and optimization in virtual screening: practical recommendations based on a critical literature analysis. J. Med. Chem. 56, 6560–6572 (2013).
Bleicher, K. H., Bohm, H. J., Muller, K. & Alanine, A. I. Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 369–378 (2003).
Inglese, J. et al. High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 466–479 (2007).
Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 882–894 (2002).
Schneider, G. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 273–276 (2010).
Lyu, J., Irwin, J. J. & Shoichet, B. K. Modeling the expansion of virtual screening libraries. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 712–718 (2023).
Deane, C. & Mokaya, M. A virtual drug-screening approach to conquer huge chemical libraries. Nature 601, 322–323 (2022).
Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 432, 862–865 (2004).
Ripphausen, P., Nisius, B. & Bajorath, J. State-of-the-art in ligand-based virtual screening. Drug Discov. Today 16, 372–376 (2011).
Lionta, E., Spyrou, G., Vassilatis, D. K. & Cournia, Z. Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: principles, applications and recent advances. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 14, 1923–1938 (2014).
Lyne, P. D. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discov. Today 7, 1047–1055 (2002).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Burley, S. K. et al. RCSB Protein Data Bank (RCSB.org): delivery of experimentally-determined PDB structures alongside one million computed structure models of proteins from artificial intelligence/machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D488–D508 (2023).
Gu, S. et al. Evaluation of AlphaFold2 structures for hit identification across multiple scenarios. J. Chem. Inf. Model 64, 3630–3639 (2024).
Shen, C. et al. Boosting protein–ligand binding pose prediction and virtual screening based on residue-atom distance likelihood potential and graph transformer. J. Med. Chem. 65, 10691–10706 (2022).
Zhang, X. et al. Efficient and accurate large library ligand docking with KarmaDock. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 789–804 (2023).
Cai, H. et al. CarsiDock: a deep learning paradigm for accurate protein–ligand docking and screening based on large-scale pre-training. Chem. Sci. 15, 1449–1471 (2024).
Gu, S. et al. Benchmarking AI-powered docking methods from the perspective of virtual screening. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 509–520 (2025).
Corso, G., Stärk, H., Jing, B., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Diffdock: diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2023).
Li, Y., Li, L., Wang, S. & Tang, X. EQUIBIND: a geometric deep learning-based protein–ligand binding prediction method. Drug Discov. Ther 17, 363–364 (2023).
Lu, W. et al. TANKBind: trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug-protein binding structure prediction. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 7236–7249 (2022).
Friesner, R. A. et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1739–1749 (2004).
Wang, Z. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein–ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 12964–12975 (2016).
Ruiz-Carmona, S. et al. rDock: a fast, versatile and open source program for docking ligands to proteins and nucleic acids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003571 (2014).
Jain, A. N. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. J. Med. Chem. 46, 499–511 (2003).
Xia, S., Chen, E. & Zhang, Y. Integrated molecular modeling and machine learning for drug design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 7478–7495 (2023).
Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D668–D672 (2006).
Chi, X. et al. Discovery and characterization of novel FAK inhibitors for breast cancer therapy via hybrid virtual screening, biological evaluation and molecular dynamics simulations. Bioorg. Chem. 159, 108400 (2025).
Passaro, S. et al. Boltz-2: towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.14.659707 (2025).
Team, B. A. A. S. et al. Protenix—advancing structure prediction through a comprehensive AlphaFold3 reproduction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.08.631967 (2025).
Bauer, M. R., Ibrahim, T. M., Vogel, S. M. & Boeckler, F. M. Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0—a public library of challenging docking benchmark sets. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 1447–1462 (2013).
Chen, L. et al. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening. PLoS ONE 14, e0220113 (2019).
Chatterjee, A. et al. Improving the generalizability of protein–ligand binding predictions with AI-Bind. Nat. Commun. 14, 1989 (2023).
Mohammad, T., Mathur, Y. & Hassan, M. I. InstaDock: a single-click graphical user interface for molecular docking-based virtual high-throughput screening. Brief. Bioinform. 22, https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa279 (2021).
Mo, Q., Xu, Z., Yan, H., Chen, P. & Lu, Y. VSTH: a user-friendly web server for structure-based virtual screening on Tianhe-2. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac740 (2023).
Gan, J. H. et al. DrugRep: an automatic virtual screening server for drug repurposing. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 44, 888–896 (2023).
Guedes, I. A. et al. DockThor-VS: a free platform for receptor-ligand virtual screening. J. Mol. Biol. 436, 168548 (2024).
Zhou, G. et al. An artificial intelligence accelerated virtual screening platform for drug discovery. Nat. Commun. 15, 7761 (2024).
Gao, B. et al. DrugCLIP: contrastive protein-molecule representation learning for virtual screening. Adv Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 44595–44614 (2024).
Buttenschoen, M., Morris, G. M. & Deane, C. M. PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences. Chem. Sci. 15, 3130–3139 (2024).
Masters, M. R., Mahmoud, A. H. & Lill, M. A. Investigating whether deep learning models for co-folding learn the physics of protein–ligand interactions. Nat. Commun. 16, 8854 (2025).
Li, Y. et al. Decoding the limits of deep learning in molecular docking for drug discovery. Chem. Sci. 16, 17374–17390 (2025).
Landrum, G. et al. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics. GitHub and SourceForge https://www.rdkit.org/ (2025).
Tran-Nguyen, V. K., Jacquemard, C. & Rognan, D. LIT-PCBA: an unbiased data set for machine learning and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 4263–4273 (2020).
Sastry, G. M., Adzhigirey, M., Day, T., Annabhimoju, R. & Sherman, W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 27, 221–234 (2013).
Gu, S. The Docker image for ‘CVSP-AIE: a comprehensive virtual screening platform with artificial intelligence engine’. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/18073542 (2025).
Gu, S. Code for ‘Facilitating structure-based drug discovery with an artificial intelligence driven virtual screening platform’. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/19448262 (2026).
Chen, L. et al. TransformerCPI: improving compound-protein interaction prediction by sequence-based deep learning with self-attention mechanism and label reversal experiments. Bioinformatics 36, 4406–4414 (2020).
Eberhardt, J., Santos-Martins, D., Tillack, A. F. & Forli, S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: new docking methods, expanded force field, and python bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 3891–3898 (2021).
Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W. & Taylor, R. D. Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 52, 609–623 (2003).
Santos-Martins, D. et al. Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and gradient-based local search. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 1060–1073 (2021).
Fey, M. & Lenssen, J. E. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.02428 (2019).
Paszke, A. et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (eds Wallach, H. M. et al.) 8026–8037 (ACM, 2019).