{"id":100101,"date":"2026-07-09T09:27:09","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T09:27:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/100101\/"},"modified":"2026-07-09T09:27:09","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T09:27:09","slug":"non-idealities-in-artificial-synapses-nature-reviews-physics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/100101\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-idealities in artificial synapses | Nature Reviews Physics"},"content":{"rendered":"

Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436\u2013444 (2015).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 25, 1097\u20131105 (2012).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. In Proc. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS, 2017).<\/p>\n

Zou, X., Xu, S., Chen, X., Yan, L. & Han, Y. Breaking the von Neumann bottleneck: architecture-level processing-in-memory technology. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 64, 1\u201310 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gholami, A. et al. AI and memory wall. IEEE Micro 44, 33\u201339 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Seok, H. et al. Beyond von Neumann architecture: brain-inspired artificial neuromorphic devices and integrated computing. Adv. Electron. Mater. 10, 2300839 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ganguly, A., Muralidhar, R. & Singh, V. Towards energy efficient non-von Neumann architectures for deep learning. In Proc. International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design 335\u2013342 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Upadhyay, N. K. et al. Emerging memory devices for neuromorphic computing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1800589 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rajendran, B. & Alibart, F. Neuromorphic computing based on emerging memory technologies. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 6, 198\u2013211 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mannocci, P. et al. In-memory computing with emerging memory devices: status and outlook. APL Mach. Learn. 1, 010902 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sun, X. & Yu, S. Impact of non-ideal characteristics of resistive synaptic devices on implementing convolutional neural networks. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 9, 570\u2013579 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, P.-Y. et al. Mitigating effects of non-ideal synaptic device characteristics for on-chip learning. In Proc. 2015 IEEE\/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design 194\u2013199 (IEEE, 2016).<\/p>\n

Burr, G. W. et al. Recent progress in phase-change memory technology. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 6, 146\u2013162 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ielmini, D. & Pedretti, G. Resistive switching random-access memory (RRAM): applications and requirements for memory and computing. Chem. Rev. 125, 5584\u20135625 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sengupta, A. & Roy, K. Encoding neural and synaptic functionalities in electron spin: a pathway to efficient neuromorphic computing. Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 41105 (2017).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, K., Song, M. S., Hwang, H., Hwang, S. & Kim, H. A comprehensive review of advanced trends: from artificial synapses to neuromorphic systems with consideration of non-ideal effects. Front. Neurosci. 18, 1279708 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Islam, R. et al. Device and materials requirements for neuromorphic computing. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52, 113001 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, B. et al. Efficient in-memory computing architecture based on crossbar arrays. In Proc. 2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 17.5.1\u201317.5.4 (IEEE, 2015).<\/p>\n

Hur, J. et al. Nonvolatile capacitive crossbar array for in-memory computing. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2100258 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Luo, Y. C. et al. Experimental demonstration of non-volatile capacitive crossbar array for in-memory computing. In Proc. 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 1\u20134 (IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n

Wang, C. et al. Scalable massively parallel computing using continuous-time data representation in nanoscale crossbar array. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1079\u20131085 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, Y., Ravichandran, V., Zhao, W. & Xia, Q. Towards energy-efficient computing hardware based on memristive nanodevices. IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag. 17, 30\u201338 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533\u2013536 (1986).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ruder, S. An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. ruder.io https:\/\/www.ruder.io\/optimizing-gradient-descent\/<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n

Hu, R. et al. Investigation of resistive switching mechanisms in Ti\/TiOx\/Pd-based RRAM devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 8, 2100827 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Duan, Y. et al. In-depth understanding of physical mechanism of the gradual switching in AlOxNy-based RRAM as memory and synapse device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 263504 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Spiga, S., Sebastian, A., Querlioz, D. & Rajendran, B. in Memristive Devices for Brain-Inspired Computing: From Materials, Devices, and Circuits to Applications \u2014 Computational Memory, Deep Learning, and Spiking Neural Networks 3\u201316 (Elsevier, 2020).<\/p>\n

Agarwal, S. et al. Resistive memory device requirements for a neural algorithm accelerator. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 929\u2013938 (IEEE, 2016).<\/p>\n

Jang, J. W., Park, S., Burr, G. W., Hwang, H. & Jeong, Y. H. Optimization of conductance change in Pr1\u2212xCaxMnO3-based synaptic devices for neuromorphic systems. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 36, 457\u2013459 (2015).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ge, R. et al. Atomristor: nonvolatile resistance switching in atomic sheets of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 18, 434\u2013441 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, S. J. et al. Giant memory window performance and low power consumption of hexagonal boron nitride monolayer atomristor. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 9, 9 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Khan, A. I. et al. Ultralow-switching current density multilevel phase-change memory on a flexible substrate. Science 373, 1243\u20131247 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, B. et al. Multi-level phase-change memory with ultralow power consumption and resistance drift. Sci. Bull. 66, 2217\u20132224 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Ma, E. & Deringer, V. L. Device-scale atomistic modelling of phase-change memory materials. Nat. Electron. 6, 746\u2013754 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, K. L., Alzate, J. G. & Khalili Amiri, P. Low-power non-volatile spintronic memory: STT-RAM and beyond. J. Phys. D\u00a046, 074003 (2013).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ramaswamy, R., Lee, J. M., Cai, K. & Yang, H. Recent advances in spin\u2013orbit torques: moving towards device applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 031107 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Siddiqui, S. A. et al. Magnetic domain wall based synaptic and activation function generator for neuromorphic accelerators. Nano Lett. 20, 1033\u20131040 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Raymenants, E. et al. Chain of magnetic tunnel junctions as a spintronic memristor. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 152116 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ross, A. et al. Multilayer spintronic neural networks with radiofrequency connections. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1273\u20131280 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, L. et al. Domain wall magnetic tunnel junction-based artificial synapses and neurons for all-spin neuromorphic hardware. Nat. Commun. 15, 4534 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hassan, N. et al. Magnetic domain wall neuron with lateral inhibition. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 152127 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Durner, C. A., Migliorini, A., Jeon, J. C. & Parkin, S. S. P. Reconfigurable magnetic inhibitor for domain wall logic and neuronal devices. ACS Nano 19, 5316\u20135325 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vakili, H. et al. Skyrmionics \u2014 computing and memory technologies based on topological excitations in magnets. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 70908 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

da C\u00e2mara Santa Clara Gomes, T. et al. Neuromorphic weighted sums with magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Electron. 8, 204\u2013214 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chai, X. et al. Nonvolatile ferroelectric field-effect transistors. Nat. Commun. 11, 2811 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mulaosmanovic, H. et al. Ferroelectric field-effect transistors based on HfO2: a review. Nanotechnology 32, 502002 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yu, E., Gaurav Kumar, K., Saxena, U. & Roy, K. Ferroelectric capacitors and field-effect transistors as in-memory computing elements for machine learning workloads. Sci. Rep. 14, 9426 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Luo, J. D. et al. Ferroelectric undoped HfOx capacitor with symmetric synaptic for neural network accelerator. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68, 1374\u20131377 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cao, R. et al. Improvement of endurance in HZO-based ferroelectric capacitor using Ru electrode. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 40, 1744\u20131747 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fouda, M. E., Neftci, E., Eltawil, A. & Kurdahi, F. Effect of asymmetric nonlinearity dynamics in RRAMs on spiking neural network performance. In Proc. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers 495\u2013499 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Onen, M. et al. Neural network training with asymmetric crosspoint elements. Front. Artif. Intell. 5, 891624 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Balatti, S. et al. Understanding pulsed-cycling variability and endurance in HfOx RRAM. In Proc. 2015 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium 5B31\u20135B36 (IEEE, 2015).<\/p>\n

Garg, C. et al. Impact of random spatial fluctuation in non-uniform crystalline phases on the device variation of ferroelectric FET. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 42, 1160\u20131163 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bin Hamid, S. & Zunaid Baten, M. Impact of process variation in spin\u2013orbit torque-based magnetic tunnel junctions on the performance of spiking neural networks. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 71, 6672\u20136679 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ni, K. et al. Impact of extrinsic variation sources on the device-to-device variation in ferroelectric FET. In Proc. 2020 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium 1\u20135 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n

Resch, S. et al. On endurance of processing in (nonvolatile) memory. In Proc. 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture 1\u201313 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).<\/p>\n

Gong, N. & Ma, T. P. A study of endurance issues in HfO2-based ferroelectric field effect transistors: charge trapping and trap generation. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 39, 15\u201318 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, J., Luan, B. & Lam, C. Resistance drift in phase change memory. In Proc.\u00a02012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium\u00a06C.1.1\u20136C.1.6 (IEEE, 2012).<\/p>\n

Baroni, A. et al. Low conductance state drift characterization and mitigation in resistive switching memories (RRAM) for artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 22, 340\u2013347 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sun, D. et al. Uniformity, linearity, and symmetry enhancement in TiOx\/MoS2\u2212xOx based analog RRAM via S-vacancy confined nanofilament. Nano Lett. 24, 16283\u201316292\u00a0(2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liao, Y. et al. A compact model of analog RRAM with device and array nonideal effects for neuromorphic systems. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 67, 1593\u20131599 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pedretti, G., Ambrosi, E. & Ielmini, D. Conductance variations and their impact on the precision of in-memory computing with resistive switching memory (RRAM). In Proc. 2021 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium 1\u20138 (IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n

Degraeve, R. et al. Causes and consequences of the stochastic aspect of filamentary RRAM. Microelectron. Eng. 147, 171\u2013175 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhao, M. et al. Investigation of statistical retention of filamentary analog RRAM for neuromorphic computing. In Proc. 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 39.4.1\u201339.4.4 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Zhao, M. et al. Endurance and retention degradation of intermediate levels in filamentary analog RRAM. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 7, 1239\u20131247 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moon, K. et al. Bidirectional non-filamentary RRAM as an analog neuromorphic synapse, Part I: Al\/Mo\/Pr0.7Ca0.3MnO3 material improvements and device measurements. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 6, 146\u2013155 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fatheema, J., Liang, L., Lee, B. H., Wang, W. & Akinwande, D. First-principles investigation of the resistive switching energetics in monolayer MoS2: insights into metal diffusion and adsorption. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 9, 74 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, S. J., Gu, Y. & Akinwande, D. Multifunctional resistance switching in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride atomristor. In Proc. 2023 Device Research Conference 1\u20132 (IEEE, 2023).<\/p>\n

Nandakumar, S. R. et al. A phase-change memory model for neuromorphic computing. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 152135 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boybat, I. et al. Neuromorphic computing with multi-memristive synapses. Nat. Commun. 9, 2514 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Syed, G. S., Le Gallo, M. & Sebastian, A. Phase-change memory for in-memory computing. Chem. Rev. 125, 5163\u20135194 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kumari, S., Durai, S. & Manivannan, A. Impact of process-induced variability on multi-bit phase change memory devices. Microelectron. J. 130, 105638 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, W. & Li, T. Characterizing and mitigating the impact of process variations on phase change based memory systems. In Proc. 42nd Annual IEEE\/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture 2\u201313 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2009).<\/p>\n

Wu, B. et al. Electronic mechanism for resistance drift in phase-change memory materials: link to persistent photoconductivity. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 53, 214002 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, X. et al. Understanding interface-controlled resistance drift in superlattice phase change memory. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43, 1669\u20131672 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Balatti, S. et al. Pulsed cycling operation and endurance failure of metal\u2013oxide resistive (RRAM). In Proc. 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 14.3.1\u201314.3.4 (IEEE, 2015).<\/p>\n

Swaidan, Z., Kanj, R., El Hajj, J., Saad, E. & Kurdahi, F. RRAM endurance and retention: challenges, opportunities and implications on reliable design. In Proc. 2019 26th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems 402\u2013405 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Kim, S. B., Burr, G. W., Kim, W. & Nam, S. W. Phase-change memory cycling endurance. MRS Bull. 44, 710\u2013714 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Safranski, C. et al. Demonstration of nanosecond operation in stochastic magnetic tunnel junctions. Nano Lett. 21, 2040\u20132045 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Finocchio, G. et al. The promise of spintronics for unconventional computing. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 521, 167506 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kl\u00e4ui, M. et al. Domain wall pinning and controlled magnetic switching in narrow ferromagnetic ring structures with notches (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 93, 7885\u20137890 (2003).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

De Araujo, C. I. L. et al. Investigation of domain wall pinning by square anti-notches and its application in three terminals MRAM. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 212403 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jenkins, S. et al. Magnetic stray fields in nanoscale magnetic tunnel junctions. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 53, 044001 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dutta, R. et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of intracell magnetic coupling-induced variability of spin-transfer torque magnetic RAMs. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 70, 5428\u20135434 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carboni, R. et al. Modeling of breakdown-limited endurance in spin-transfer torque magnetic memory under pulsed cycling regime. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65, 2470\u20132478 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carboni, R. et al. Understanding cycling endurance in perpendicular spin-transfer torque (p-STT) magnetic memory. In Proc. 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 21.6.1\u201321.6.4 (IEEE, 2017).<\/p>\n

Katti, R. R. Magnetoresistive random access memories for space and radiation-hardened applications. In Proc. 2021 IEEE 32nd Magnetic Recording Conference 1\u20133\u00a0(IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n

Jerry, M. et al. Ferroelectric FET analog synapse for acceleration of deep neural network training. In Proc. 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 6.2.1\u20136.2.4 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Clima, S. et al. Ferroelectric switching in FEFET: physics of the atomic mechanism and switching dynamics in HfZrOx, HfO2 with oxygen vacancies and Si dopants. In Proc. 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 4.2.1\u20134.2.4 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n

Yurchuk, E. et al. Charge-trapping phenomena in HfO2-based FeFET-type nonvolatile memories. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63, 3501\u20133507 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deng, S. et al. Examination of the interplay between polarization switching and charge trapping in ferroelectric FET. In Proc. 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 4.4.1\u20134.4.4 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n

Higashi, Y. et al. Impact of charge trapping and depolarization on data retention using simultaneous P\u2013V and I\u2013V in HfO-based ferroelectric FET. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68, 4391\u20134396 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, T. P. & Gong, N. Retention and endurance of FeFET memory cells. In Proc.\u00a02019 IEEE 11th International Memory Workshop 1\u20134 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Song, Y. et al. Fatigue of ferroelectric field effect transistor: mechanisms and optimization strategies. J. Semicond. 46, 061302 (2025).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Higashi, Y. et al. Impact of charge trapping on imprint and its recovery in HfO2 based FeFET. In Proc. 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 15.6.1\u201315.6.4 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Crafton, B., Talley, C., Spetalnick, S., Yoon, J. H. & Raychowdhury, A. Characterization and mitigation of IR-drop in RRAM-based compute in-memory. In Proc. 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 70\u201374 (IEEE, 2022).<\/p>\n

Lupo, N., P\u00e9rez, E., Wenger, C., Maloberti, F. & Bonizzoni, E. Analysis of parasitic effects in filamentary-switching memristive memories using an approximated Verilog \u2014 a memristor model. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 66, 1935\u20131947 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, Y. et al. Recent progress in memristor array structures and solutions for sneak path current reduction. Adv. Mater. Technol. 10, 2400585 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Murmann, B. Mixed-signal computing for deep neural network inference. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. VLSI Syst. 29, 3\u201313 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zeng, T. et al. Approaching the ideal linearity in epitaxial crystalline-type memristor by controlling filament growth. Adv. Mater. 36, 2401021 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Islam, R. et al. Improved gradual resistive switching range and 1000\u2009\u00d7\u2009on\/off ratio in HfOx RRAM achieved with a Ge2Sb2Te5 thermal barrier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 082103 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, W. et al. A methodology to improve linearity of analog RRAM for neuromorphic computing. In Proc. 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology 103\u2013104 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Vishwakarma, K., Datta, A. & Kishore, R. Symmetric linear rise and fall of conductance in a trilayer stack engineered RERAM-based synapse. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 3263\u20133269 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kang, J. et al. Cluster-type analogue memristor by engineering redox dynamics for high-performance neuromorphic computing. Nat. Commun. 13, 4040 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kempen, T., Waser, R. & Rana, V. 50x endurance improvement in TaOx RRAM by extrinsic doping. In Proc. 2021 IEEE International Memory Workshop 1\u20134\u00a0(IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n

Lee, M. J. et al. A fast, high-endurance and scalable non-volatile memory device made from asymmetric Ta2O(5-x)\/TaO(2-x) bilayer structures. Nat. Mater. 10, 625\u2013630 (2011).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, H. Y. et al. Low power and high speed bipolar switching with a thin reactive Ti buffer layer in robust HfO2 based RRAM. In Proc.\u00a02008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 1\u20134 (IEEE, 2008).<\/p>\n

Lee, Y. et al. Programmable retention characteristics in MoS2-based atomristors for neuromorphic and reservoir computing systems. ACS Nano 18, 14327\u201314338 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yuan, Y. et al. On-chip atomristors. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 165, 101006 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chang, H.-P., Akinwande, D. & Incorvia, J. A. C. Monolayer hBN RRAM with high DC endurance and low operation voltages using an oxidized top electrode. In Proc. 2024 Device Research Conference 1\u20132\u00a0(IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n

Choi, S. et al. SiGe epitaxial memory for neuromorphic computing with reproducible high performance based on engineered dislocations. Nat. Mater. 17, 335\u2013340 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Park, J. et al. Multi-level, forming and filament free, bulk switching trilayer RRAM for neuromorphic computing at the edge. Nat. Commun. 15, 3492 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, S. et al. 4-bit multilevel operation in overshoot suppressed Al2O3\/TiOx resistive random-access memory crossbar array. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2100273 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ren, K. et al. Controllable SET process in O\u2013Ti\u2013Sb\u2013Te based phase change memory for synaptic application. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 073106 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, X. et al. Understanding phase-change behaviors of carbon-doped Ge2Sb2Te5 for phase-change memory application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 14207\u201314214 (2014).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Khan, A. I. et al. Energy efficient neuro-inspired phase\u2013change memory based on Ge4Sb6Te7 as a novel epitaxial nanocomposite. Adv. Mater. 35, 2300107 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bin Hamid, S., Intisar Khan, A., Zhang, H., Davydov, A. V. & Pop, E. Low-energy spiking neural network using Ge4Sb6Te7 phase change memory synapses. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 45, 1819\u20131822 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Suri, M. et al. Addition of HfO2 interface layer for improved synaptic performance of phase change memory (PCM) devices. Solid State Electron. 79, 227\u2013232 (2013).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lin, J. et al. Design of all-phase-change-memory spiking neural network enabled by Ge\u2013Ga\u2013Sb compound. Sci. China Mater. 66, 1551\u20131558 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, W. et al. Confined PCM-based analog synaptic devices offering low resistance-drift and 1000 programmable states for deep learning. In Proc. 2019 Symposium on VLSI Technology T66\u2013T67 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Wu, X. et al. Novel nanocomposite-superlattices for low energy and high stability nanoscale phase-change memory. Nat. Commun. 15, 13 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Intisar Khan, A. et al. First demonstration of Ge2Sb2Te5-based superlattice phase change memory with low reset current density (\u22123 MA\/cm2) and low resistance drift (\u22120.002 at 105\u2009\u00b0C). In Proc. 2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits 310\u2013311 (IEEE, 2022).<\/p>\n

Liu, S. et al. A domain wall-magnetic tunnel junction artificial synapse with notched geometry for accurate and efficient training of deep neural networks. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 202405 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hissariya, R. & Bhowmik, D. Improving linearity and symmetry of synaptic update characteristics and retentivity of synaptic states of the domain-wall device through addition of edge notches. IEEE Open J. Nanotechnol. 6, 1\u20139 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leonard, T. et al. Shape-dependent multi-weight magnetic artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing. Adv. Electron. Mater. 8, 2200563 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ostwal, V., Zand, R., Demara, R. & Appenzeller, J. A novel compound synapse using probabilistic spin-orbit-torque switching for MTJ-based deep neural networks. IEEE J. Explor. Solid State Comput. Devices Circuits 5, 182\u2013187 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jeong, J. et al. Spintronic artificial synapses using voltage-controlled multilevel magnetic states. Adv. Electron. Mater. 10, 2300889 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Raymenants, E. et al. Nanoscale domain wall devices with magnetic tunnel junction read and write. Nat. Electron. 4, 392\u2013398 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jeon, J. C., Migliorini, A., Fischer, L., Yoon, J. & Parkin, S. S. P. Dynamic manipulation of chiral domain wall spacing for advanced spintronic memory and logic devices. ACS Nano 18, 14507\u201314513 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, Y. et al. Hybrid-FE-layer FeFET with high linearity and endurance toward on-chip CIM by array demonstration. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 45, 276\u2013279 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aabrar, K. A. et al. BEOL-compatible superlattice FeFET analog synapse with improved linearity and symmetry of weight update. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 69, 2094\u20132100 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yoon, S. J. et al. Improvement in long-term and high-temperature retention stability of ferroelectric field-effect memory transistors with metal-ferroelectric-metal\u2013insulator\u2013semiconductor gate-stacks using Al-doped HfO2 thin films. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 67, 499\u2013504 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ali, T. et al. High Endurance ferroelectric hafnium oxide-based FeFET memory without retention penalty. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65, 3769\u20133774 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tan, A. J. et al. Ferroelectric HfO2 memory transistors with high-\u03ba interfacial layer and write endurance exceeding 1010 cycles. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 42, 994\u2013997 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, Y. et al. Optimized programming scheme enabling symmetric conductance modulation in HfO resistive random-access memory (RRAM) for neuromorphic systems. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43, 1203\u20131206 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Park, J. et al. TiOx-based RRAM synapse with 64-levels of conductance and symmetric conductance change by adopting a hybrid pulse scheme for neuromorphic computing. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 37, 1559\u20131562 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moon, K., Kwak, M., Park, J., Lee, D. & Hwang, H. Improved conductance linearity and conductance ratio of 1T2R synapse device for neuromorphic systems. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 38, 1023\u20131026 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sakhuja, J., Patil, S., Mondal, S., Lashkare, S. & Ganguly, U. Enhancement in bipolar conductance linearity by one transistor\u2013one resistor (1T1R) cell with non-filamentary PCMO-RRAM as synapse for neural networks. In Proc. 2023 7th IEEE Electron Devices Technology & Manufacturing Conference 1\u20133 (IEEE, 2023).<\/p>\n

Zhou, Z. et al. A new hardware implementation approach of BNNs based on nonlinear 2T2R synaptic cell. In Proc. 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 20.7.1\u201320.7.4 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Li, C. et al. Efficient and self-adaptive in-situ learning in multilayer memristor neural networks. Nat. Commun. 9, 2385 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ninomiya, T. et al. Improvement of data retention during long-term use by suppressing conductive filament expansion in TaOx bipolar-ReRAM. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 762\u2013764 (2013).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, Y. et al. An improved RRAM-based binarized neural network with high variation-tolerated forward\/backward propagation module. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 67, 469\u2013473 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bichler, O. et al. Visual pattern extraction using energy-efficient \u20182-PCM synapse\u2019 neuromorphic architecture. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 2206\u20132214 (2012).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kuzum, D., Jeyasingh, R. G. D., Lee, B. & Wong, H. S. P. Nanoelectronic programmable synapses based on phase change materials for brain-inspired computing. Nano Lett. 12, 2179\u20132186 (2012).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stern, K. et al. Sub-nanosecond pulses enable partial reset for analog phase change memory. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 42, 1291\u20131294 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shi, Y. et al. Adaptive quantization as a device-algorithm co-design approach to improve the performance of in-memory unsupervised learning with SNNs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 66, 1722\u20131728 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Joshi, V. et al. Accurate deep neural network inference using computational phase-change memory. Nat. Commun. 11, 2473 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Taylor, L. & Nitschke, G. Improving deep learning with generic data augmentation. In Proc. 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence 1542\u20131547 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Zhang, W. & Li, T. Helmet: a resistance drift resilient architecture for multi-level cell phase change memory system. In Proc. 2011 IEEE\/IFIP 41st International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks 197\u2013208 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Nandakumar, S. R. et al. Experimental demonstration of supervised learning in spiking neural networks with phase-change memory synapses. Sci. Rep. 10, 8080 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, C. et al. Nonideality suppression and 16-state multilevel cell storage optimization in phase change memory with linear-like circuit. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70, 493\u2013498 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Oh, S. et al. HfZrOx-based ferroelectric synapse device with 32 levels of conductance states for neuromorphic applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 38, 732\u2013735 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sun, X., Wang, P., Ni, K., Datta, S. & Yu, S. Exploiting hybrid precision for training and inference: a 2T-1FeFET based analog synaptic weight cell. In Proc. 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 3.1.1\u20133.1.4 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Gong, N. et al. Deep learning acceleration in 14\u2009nm CMOS compatible ReRAM array: device, material and algorithm co-optimization. In Proc. 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting 33.7.1\u201333.7.4 (IEEE, 2022).<\/p>\n

Zhao, G. et al. Design-technology co-optimizations for symmetric linear synapse behaviors in ferroelectric FET based neuromorphic computing. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 21, 747\u2013751 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lederer, M. et al. Ferroelectric field effect transistors as a synapse for neuromorphic application. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68, 2295\u20132300 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Agarwal, S. et al. Achieving ideal accuracies in analog neuromorphic computing using periodic carry. In Proc. 2017 Symposium on VLSI Technology T174\u2013T175 (IEEE, 2017).<\/p>\n

Hu, M. et al. Memristor-based analog computation and neural network classification with a dot product engine. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705914 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yao, P. et al. Fully hardware-implemented memristor convolutional neural network. Nature 577, 641\u2013646 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nandakumar, S. R. et al. Mixed-precision deep learning based on computational memory. Front. Neurosci. 14, 519263 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bayat, F. M. et al. Implementation of multilayer perceptron network with highly uniform passive memristive crossbar circuits. Nat. Commun. 9, 2331 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yu, S., Kuzum, D. & Wong, H. S. P. Design considerations of synaptic device for neuromorphic computing. In Proc. 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 1062\u20131065 (IEEE, 2014).<\/p>\n

Eryilmaz, S. B., Kuzum, D., Yu, S. & Wong, H.-S. P. Device and system level design considerations for analog-non-volatile-memory based neuromorphic architectures. In Proc. 2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 4.1.1\u20134.1.4 (IEEE, 2015).<\/p>\n

Bi, G. Q. & Poo, M. M. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci. 18, 10464\u201310472 (1998).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fusi, S., Drew, P. J. & Abbott, L. F. Cascade models of synaptically stored memories. Neuron 45, 599\u2013611 (2005).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Branco, T. & Staras, K. The probability of neurotransmitter release: variability and feedback control at single synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 373\u2013383 (2009).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Laborieux, A., Ernoult, M., Hirtzlin, T. & Querlioz, D. Synaptic metaplasticity in binarized neural networks. Nat. Commun. 12, 2549 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zanardi, G., Bettotti, P., Morand, J., Pavesi, L. & Tubiana, L. Metaplasticity and memory in multilevel recurrent feed-forward networks. Phys. Rev. E 110, 054304 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kireev, D. et al. Metaplastic and energy-efficient biocompatible graphene artificial synaptic transistors for enhanced accuracy neuromorphic computing. Nat. Commun. 13, 4386 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bernard, G. et al. Dynamic control of weight-update linearity in magneto-ionic synapses. Nano Lett. 25, 1443\u20131450 (2025).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neal, R. M. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks (Springer, 1996).<\/p>\n

Liu, S. et al. Bayesian neural networks using magnetic tunnel junction-based probabilistic in-memory computing. Front. Nanotechnol. 4, 1021943 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shim, Y., Chen, S., Sengupta, A. & Roy, K. Stochastic spin\u2013orbit torque devices as elements for Bayesian inference. Sci. Rep. 7, 14101 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harabi, K. E. et al. A memristor-based Bayesian machine. Nat. Electron. 6, 52\u201363 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Turck, C. et al. The logarithmic memristor-based Bayesian machine. Commun. Eng. 4, 35 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neftci, E. O., Pedroni, B. U., Joshi, S., Al-Shedivat, M. & Cauwenberghs, G. Stochastic synapses enable efficient brain-inspired learning machines. Front. Neurosci. 10, 185771 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Das, H., Patel, K. P., Febbo, R. D., Schuman, C. D. & Rose, G. S. Leveraging stochasticity in memristive synapses for efficient and reliable neuromorphic systems. npj Unconv. Comput. 2, 3 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, Z. et al. In situ training of feed-forward and recurrent convolutional memristor networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 434\u2013442 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bhattacharjee, A. & Panda, P. Rethinking non-idealities in memristive crossbars for adversarial robustness in neural networks. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/2008.11298<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n

Liu, Y., Mao, S., Mei, X., Yang, T. & Zhao, X. Sensitivity of adversarial perturbation in fast gradient sign method. In Proc. 2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence 433\u2013436 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Deng, Y. & Karam, L. J. Universal adversarial attack via enhanced projected gradient descent. In Proc. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 1241\u20131245 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n

Barve, S., Shukla, S., Dinakarrao, S. M. P. & Jha, R. Adversarial attack mitigation approaches using RRAM-neuromorphic architectures. In Proc. ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 201\u2013206 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).<\/p>\n

Yamauchi, K. et al. Conductance variation-assisted adversarial attack robustness on 40\u2009nm TaOx-based ReRAM CiM. In Proc. 2025 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium 1\u20136 (IEEE, 2025).<\/p>\n

Lin, Y. et al. Demonstration of generative adversarial network by intrinsic random noises of analog RRAM devices. In Proc. 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 3.4.1\u20133.4.4 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Lammie, C., B\u00fcchel, J., Vasilopoulos, A., Le Gallo, M. & Sebastian, A. The inherent adversarial robustness of analog in-memory computing. Nat. Commun. 16, 1756 (2025).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rajasekharan, D., Rangarajan, N., Patnaik, S., Sinanoglu, O. & Chauhan, Y. S. SCANet: securing the weights with superparamagnetic-MTJ crossbar array networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 34, 5693\u20135707 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Koh, D. et al. Closed loop superparamagnetic tunnel junctions for reliable true randomness and generative artificial intelligence. Nano Lett. 25, 3799\u20133806 (2025).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berdan, R. et al. Emulating short-term synaptic dynamics with memristive devices. Sci. Rep. 6, 18639 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zohora, F. T., Karia, V., Soures, N. & Kudithipudi, D. Probabilistic metaplasticity for continual learning with memristors. Sci. Rep. 14, 29496 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, J. K., Kwon, O., Jeon, B. & Kim, S. Reservoir computing for temporal data processing using resistive switching memory devices based on ITO treated with O2 plasma. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70, 5651\u20135656 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fan, X. et al. Metaplasticity-enabled graphene quantum dot devices for mitigating catastrophic forgetting in artificial neural networks. Adv. Mater. 37, 2411237 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Park, S. et al. Neuromorphic speech systems using advanced ReRAM-based synapse. In Proc. 2013 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 25.6.1\u201325.6.4 (IEEE, 2013).<\/p>\n

Doevenspeck, J. et al. Multi-pillar SOT-MRAM for accurate analog in-memory DNN inference. In Proc. 2021 Symposium on VLSI Technology 1\u20132 (IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n

Kim, M. K. & Lee, J. S. Ferroelectric analog synaptic transistors. Nano Lett. 19, 2044\u20132050 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, W. et al. Improving analog switching in HfOx-based resistive memory with a thermal enhanced layer. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 38, 1019\u20131022 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kumar, A. et al. Filament-free bulk RRAM with high endurance and long retention for neuromorphic few-shot learning on-chip. In Proc. 2024 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 1\u20134 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n

Zhou, Y. et al. A compact writing scheme for the reliability challenges in 1T multi-level FeFET array: variation, endurance, and write disturb. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 45, 2387\u20132390 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, P. Y., Peng, X. & Yu, S. NeuroSim: a circuit-level macro model for benchmarking neuro-inspired architectures in online learning. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.\u00a037, 3067\u20133080 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, S., Lim, M., Kim, Y., Kim, H. D. & Choi, S. J. Impact of synaptic device variations on pattern recognition accuracy in a hardware neural network. Sci. Rep. 8, 2638 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436\u2013444 (2015). ADS\u00a0 Google Scholar\u00a0 Krizhevsky, A.,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":100102,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,45251,52139,617,963,164],"class_list":["post-100101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-electrical-and-electronic-engineering","tag-electronic-devices","tag-general","tag-information-technology","tag-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100101\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100102"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}