Rolnick, D. et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 1\u201396 (2022).<\/p>\n
Villalobos, P. et al. Machine learning model sizes and the parameter gap. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2207.02852<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n Wu, C.-J., Acun, B., Raghavendra, R. & Hazelwood, K. Beyond efficiency: scaling AI sustainably. IEEE Micro 44, 37\u201346 (2024).<\/p>\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0 Powering intelligence: analyzing artificial intelligence and data center energy consumption. White Paper on Technology Innovation Report EPRI https:\/\/www.epri.com\/research\/products\/3002028905<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Davenport, C. et al. AI, data centers and the coming US power demand surge. Equity research report. Goldman Sachs https:\/\/www.goldmansachs.com\/pdfs\/insights\/pages\/generational-growth-ai-data-centers-and-the-coming-us-power-surge\/report.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n O\u2019Donnell, J. & Crownhart, C. We did the math on AI\u2019s energy footprint. Here\u2019s the story you haven\u2019t heard. MIT Technology Review https:\/\/www.technologyreview.com\/2025\/05\/20\/1116327\/ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Electricity 2024. International Energy Agency https:\/\/www.iea.org\/reports\/electricity-2024<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Shehabi, A. et al. 2024 United States data center energy usage report. LBNL-2001637 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https:\/\/escholarship.org\/uc\/item\/32d6m0d1<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n 2024 environmental report. Google https:\/\/sustainability.google\/reports\/google-2024-environmental-report\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A. & Ren, S. Making AI less \u201cthirsty\u201d: uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models. Commun. ACM 68, 54\u201361 (2025).<\/p>\n Chien, A. A., Zhang, C. & Lin, L. Beyond PUE: flexible datacenters empowering the cloud to decarbonize. In Workshop on Sustainable Computer Systems 2022 USENIX HotCarbon https:\/\/par.nsf.gov\/biblio\/10400420<\/a> (USENIX, 2022).<\/p>\n Tomlinson, B., Torrance, A. W. & Ripple, W. J. Scientists\u2019 warning on technology. J. Clean. Prod. 434, 140074 (2024).<\/p>\n Wang, J. et al. Designing cloud servers for lower carbon. In Proc. 51st Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA \u201824) (ACM\/IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n Virginia electricity profile 2024. United States Energy Information Administration https:\/\/www.eia.gov\/electricity\/state\/virginia\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Gupta, U. et al. Chasing carbon: the elusive environmental footprint of computing. IEEE Micro 42, 37\u201347 (2022).<\/p>\n Xiao, T., Nerini, F. F., Matthews, H. D., Tavoni, M. & You, F. Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artificial intelligence servers in the USA. Nat. Sustain. 8, 1541\u20131553 (2025).<\/p>\n Energy and AI. International Energy Agency https:\/\/www.iea.org\/reports\/energy-and-ai<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Rivera, M. B., H\u00e5kansson, C., Svenfelt, \u00c5 & Finnveden, G. Including second order effects in environmental assessments of ICT. Environ. Model. Softw. 56, 105\u2013115 (2014). This is a thematic issue on modelling and evaluating the sustainability of smart solutions.<\/p>\n K\u00f6hler, A. & Erdmann, L. Expected environmental impacts of pervasive computing. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 10, 831\u2013852 (2004).<\/p>\n Zhao, W. X. et al. A survey of large language models. Front. Comput. Sci. 20, 2012627 (2026).<\/p>\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0 Gomes, C. et al. Computational sustainability: computing for a better world and a sustainable future. Commun. ACM 62, 56\u201365 (2019).<\/p>\n Chien, A. A. et al. Reducing the carbon impact of generative AI inference (today and in 2035). ACM SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 4, 65\u201372 (2024).<\/p>\n Lechowicz, A. et al. Online conversion with switching costs: robust and learning-augmented algorithms. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 52, 45\u201346 (2024).<\/p>\n Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS \u201920) (eds Larochelle, H. et al.) Vol. 33, 1877\u20131901 (Curran Associates, 2020).<\/p>\n Gerke, B. F. et al. The California demand response potential study, phase 4: report on shed and shift resources through 2050. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https:\/\/eta-publications.lbl.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/phase_4_dr_potential_study_final_2024-05-21.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Crafts, N. Artificial intelligence as a general-purpose technology: an historical perspective. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 37, 521\u2013536 (2021).<\/p>\n Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M. & Qamar, D. Artificial intelligence and corporate innovation: a review and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 188, 122264 (2023).<\/p>\n Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).<\/p>\n Wu, C.-J. et al. Sustainable AI: environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. In Proc. 5th MLSys Conf. https:\/\/proceedings.mlsys.org\/paper_files\/paper\/2022\/file\/462211f67c7d858f663355eff93b745e-Paper.pdf<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n Patterson, D. et al. The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer 55, 18\u201328 (2022).<\/p>\n Gupta, U. et al. ACT: designing sustainable computer systems with an architectural carbon modeling tool. In Proc. 49th Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA \u201822) (eds Salapura, V. et al.) 784\u2013799 (ACM\/IEEE, 2022).<\/p>\n Han, L., Kakadia, J., Lee, B. C. & Gupta, U. Fair-CO2: fair attribution for cloud carbon emissions. In Proc. 52nd Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA \u201825) 646\u2013663 (ACM\/IEEE, 2025).<\/p>\n Lisa Li, Y. et al. Fair, practical, and efficient carbon accounting for LLM serving. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 53, 99\u2013103 (2025).<\/p>\n Han, L., Lisa Li, Y. & Gupta, U. Metrics for data center embodied carbon. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 53, 90\u201392 (2025).<\/p>\n Lee, B. C. et al. A view of the sustainable computing landscape. Patterns 6, 101296 (2025).<\/p>\n Kline, D. et al. GreenChip: a tool for evaluating holistic sustainability of modern computing systems. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 22, 322\u2013332 (2019).<\/p>\n Eeckhout, L. Focal: A first-order carbon model to assess processor sustainability. In Proc. 29th ACM Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS \u201924) (eds Abu-Ghazaleh, N. et al.) Vol. 2, 401\u2013415 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n GreenSKU-Model. GitHub https:\/\/github.com\/Azure\/AzurePublicDataset<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Li, S. et al. McPAT: an integrated power, area, and timing modeling framework for multicore and manycore architectures. In Proc. 42nd Ann. Int. Symp. Microarchitecture (MICRO 42) 469\u2013480 (ACM\/IEEE, 2009).<\/p>\n Binkert, N. et al. The gem5 simulator. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 39, 1\u20137 (2011).<\/p>\n Li, S., Chen, K., Ahn, J. H., Brockman, J. B. & Jouppi, N. P. CACTI-P: architecture-level modeling for SRAM-based structures with advanced leakage reduction techniques. In Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) 694\u2013701 (ACM\/IEEE, 2011).<\/p>\n Garcia Bardon, M. et al. DTCO including sustainability: power\u2013performance\u2013area\u2013cost\u2013environmental score (PPACE) analysis for logic technologies. In Proc. Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 41.4.1\u201341.4.4 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n Tannu, S. & Nair, P. J. The dirty secret of SSDs: embodied carbon. SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 3, 4\u20139 (2022).<\/p>\n Sudarshan, C. C., Matkar, N., Vrudhula, S., Sapatnekar, S. S. & Chhabria, V. A. ECO-CHIP: estimation of carbon footprint of chiplet-based architectures for sustainable VLSI. In Int. Symp. High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 671\u2013685 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y. K., Wan, C. & Lin, Y. C. 3D-carbon: an analytical carbon modeling tool for 3D and 2.5D integrated circuits. In Proc. 61st Design Automation Conf. (DAC \u201924) (ACM\/IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n Acun, B. et al. Carbon Explorer: a holistic approach for designing carbon aware datacenters. In Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems 118\u2013132 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Li, Y. et al. Ecoserve: designing carbon-aware AI inference systems. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2502.05043<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n IMEC netzero virtual fab. IMEC https:\/\/netzero.imec-int.com\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Falk, S. et al. More than carbon: cradle-to-grave environmental impacts of GenAI training on the Nvidia A100 GPU. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 121, 108525 (2026).<\/p>\n Chen, X., Han, L., Bhagavathula, A. & Gupta, U. CarbonClarity: understanding and addressing uncertainty in embodied carbon for sustainable computing. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Aided Design (ICCAD) 1\u20139 (ACM\/IEEE, 2025).<\/p>\n Bhagavathula, A., Han, L. & Gupta, U. Understanding the implications of uncertainty in embodied carbon models for sustainable computing. HotCarbon https:\/\/hotcarbon.org\/assets\/2024\/pdf\/hotcarbon24-final146.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Ning, A., Tziantzioulis, G. & Wentzlaff, D. Supply chain aware computer architecture. In Proc. 50th Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA \u201923) 17 (ACM\/IEEE, 2023).<\/p>\n Elsworth, C. et al. Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google scale. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2508.15734<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Chung, J.-W. et al. The ML.ENERGY Benchmark: Toward Automated Inference Energy Measurement and Optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 (NeurIPS, 2025).<\/p>\n Schneider, I. et al. An introduction to life-cycle emissions of AI hardware. IEEE Micro 45, 9\u201319 (2025).<\/p>\n Schneider, I. et al. An Introduction to Life-Cycle Emissions of Artificial Intelligence Hardware. IEEE Micro 45, 10\u201322 (2025).<\/p>\n Luccioni, S., Jernite, Y. & Strubell, E. Power hungry processing: watts driving the cost of AI deployment? In Proc. Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 85\u201399 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Morrison, J. et al. Holistically evaluating the environmental impact of creating language models. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2503.05804<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Patterson, D. et al. Recovery-oriented computing (ROC): motivation, definition, techniques, and case studies. Technical Report. ACM Digital Library https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.5555\/894137<\/a> (2002).<\/p>\n Patterson, D. et al. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2104.10350<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n Wang, J. STAR-Research: GreenSKU-Model: ISCA artifact. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.10896255<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Tomlinson, B., Black, R. W., Patterson, D. J. & Torrance, A. W. The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans. Sci. Rep. 14, 3732 (2024).<\/p>\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0 Ren, S., Tomlinson, B., Black, R. W. & Torrance, A. W. Reconciling the contrasting narratives on the environmental impact of large language models. Sci. Rep. 14, 26310 (2024).<\/p>\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0 Panteleaki, A. M. et al. Carbon-Efficient 3D DNN Acceleration: Optimizing Performance and Sustainability. In Proc. 2025 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI 1\u20136 (IEEE, 2025).<\/p>\n Fayza, F. et al. Photonics for sustainable AI. Commun. Phys. 8, 403 (2025).<\/p>\n Elgamal, M. et al. Cordoba: carbon-efficient optimization framework for computing systems. In 31st Int. Symp. High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 1289\u20131303 (IEEE, 2025).<\/p>\n Byun, H. J., Gupta, U. & Seo, J.-S. 3D IC architecture evaluation and optimization with digital compute-in-memory designs. In Proc. 29th Int. Symp. Low Power Electronics and Design 1\u20136 (ACM\/IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n Byun, H. J., Gupta, U. & Seo, J.-S. Energy-\/carbon-aware evaluation and optimization of 3D IC architecture with digital compute-in-memory designs. IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 10, 98\u2013106 (2024).<\/p>\n Fayza, F. et al. Epicarbon: a carbon modeling tool for electro-photonic accelerators. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer-aided Design 1\u20139 (IEEE, 2025).<\/p>\n Wu, H. et al. COFFEE: a carbon-modeling and optimization framework for HZO-based FeFET eNVMs. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2602.05018<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Software carbon intensity (SCI) specification. Green Software Foundation https:\/\/sci.greensoftware.foundation\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Gao, J., Wang, H. & Shen, H. Smartly handling renewable energy instability in supporting a cloud datacenter. In Proc. Int. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. 769\u2013778 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n Chen, G. et al. Energy-aware server provisioning and load dispatching for connection-intensive internet services. In Proc. 5th USENIX Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI \u201808) 337\u2013350 (USENIX Association, 2008).<\/p>\n Delimitrou, C. & Kozyrakis, C. Quasar: resource-efficient and QoS-aware cluster management. In Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS \u201814) 127\u2013144 (ACM, 2014).<\/p>\n Wu, Q. et al. Dynamo: Facebook\u2019s data center-wide power management system. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 44, 469\u2013480 (2016).<\/p>\n Urgaonkar, R., Kozat, U. C., Igarashi, K. & Neely, M. J. Dynamic resource allocation and power management in virtualized data centers. In Proc. Network Operations and Management Symp. (NOMS 2010) 479\u2013486 (IEEE, 2010).<\/p>\n Kumbhare, A. G. et al. Prediction-Based Power Oversubscription in Cloud Platforms. In Proc. 2021 USENIX Annual Technical Conference 473\u2013487 (USENIX Association, 2021).<\/p>\n Zhang, C. et al. Flex: high-availability datacenters with zero reserved power. In Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA) 319\u2013332 (ACM\/IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n Patel, P. et al. Towards improved power management in cloud GPUs. Comput. Arch. Lett. 22, 141\u2013144 (2023).<\/p>\n Lyu, J. et al. Myths and misconceptions around reducing carbon embedded in cloud platforms. In Proc. 2nd Worksh. Sustainable Computer Systems (HotCarbon \u201823) 7 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Zhao, J. et al. Galore: memory-efficient LLM training by gradient low-rank projection. In Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML\u201924) (eds Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) 2528 (JMLR, 2024).<\/p>\n Abdin, M. et al. Phi-3 technical report: a highly capable language model locally on your phone. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2404.14219<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Mazumder, M. et al. Dataperf: benchmarks for data-centric AI development. In Proc. 37th Int. Conf. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS \u201923) (eds Oh, A. et al.) 235 (Curran Associates, 2023).<\/p>\n Griggs, T. et al. M\u00e9lange: cost efficient large language model serving by exploiting GPU heterogeneity. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2404.14527<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Patel, P. et al. Splitwise: efficient generative LLM inference using phase splitting. In Proc. 51st Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA) 118\u2013132 (ACM\/IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n Li, Y. L., Graif, O. & Gupta, U. Towards carbon-efficient LLM life cycle. In Proc. 3rd Workshop Sustain. Comput. Syst. (HotCarbon \u201824) (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Naffziger, S. et al. Pioneering chiplet technology and design for the amd epyc\u2122 and ryzen\u2122 processor families: industrial product. In 48th Ann. Int. Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA) 57\u201370 (ACM\/IEEE, 2021).<\/p>\n Pentecost, L. et al. Maxnvm: maximizing dnn storage density and inference efficiency with sparse encoding and error mitigation. In Proc. 52nd Ann. Int. Symp. Microarchitecture (MICRO \u201952) 769\u2013781 (ACM\/IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n Cortez, E. et al. Resource central: understanding and predicting workloads for improved resource management in large cloud platforms. In Symp. Operating Systems Principles https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3132747.3132772<\/a> (ACM, 2017).<\/p>\n Connatser, M. AMD adds 128-core Bergamo and 3D V-Cache Genoa CPUs to Zen 4 Epyc lineup. XDA https:\/\/www.xda-developers.com\/amd-128-core-bergame-genoa-epyc-cpu\/<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n Sharma, D. D., Blankenship, R. & Berger, D. S. An Introduction to the Compute Express Link (CXL) interconnect. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 290 (2024).<\/p>\n Larabel, M. AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo Review. phoronix https:\/\/www.phoronix.com\/review\/amd-epyc-9754-bergamo<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n Long term reliability assessment, january 2026. Tech. Rep. North American Electric Reliability Corporation https:\/\/www.nerc.com\/globalassets\/our-work\/assessments\/nerc_ltra_2025.pdf<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n FERC directs nation\u2019s largest grid operator to create new rules to embrace innovation and protect consumers. FERC (2025).<\/p>\n Mills, D. Board decisional letter on critical issue fast path \u2014 large load additions. PJM https:\/\/www.pjm.com\/-\/media\/DotCom\/about-pjm\/who-we-are\/public-disclosures\/2026\/20260116-pjm-board-letter-re-results-of-the-cifp-process-large-load-additions.pdf<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Ebeed, M., Kamel, S. & Jurado, F. In Classical and Recent Aspects of Power System Optimization (eds Zobaa, A. F., Abdel Aleem, S. H. & Abdelaziz, A. Y.) Ch. 7, 157\u2013183 (Academic, 2018).<\/p>\n Greatest engineering accomplishments of the 20th century. NAE http:\/\/www.greatachievements.org\/<\/a> (2006).<\/p>\n Monthly outlook for resource adequacy (MORA) reporting month: July 2026. ERCOT https:\/\/www.ercot.com\/files\/docs\/2026\/05\/01\/MORA_July2026.pdf<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Miso business process manual manual no. 011 business practices manual resource adequacy. MISO https:\/\/cdn.misoenergy.org\/BPM-011%20Resource%20Adequacy110405.zip?v=20260311160104<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n CAISO. Monthly renewables performance reports 2026. California ISO https:\/\/www.caiso.com\/library\/monthly-renewables-performance-reports-2026<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Wiser, R. H., Mills, A. D., Seel, J., Levin, T. & Botterud, A. Impacts of variable renewable energy on bulk power system assets, pricing, and costs. Tech. Rep. LBNL-2001082 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2017).<\/p>\n Chien, A. A. Characterizing opportunity power in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) in years 2015-2017. Energy Earth Sci. 3, 2 (2020).<\/p>\n Real time daily market watch, real-time market, march 15, 2026. California ISO https:\/\/www.caiso.com\/documents\/real-time-daily-market-watch-mar-15-2026.html<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Millstein, D., O\u2019Shaughnessy, E. & Wiser, R. Exploring wholesale energy price trends the renewables and wholesale electricity prices (REWEP) tool, version 2024. Berkeley Lab https:\/\/emp.lbl.gov\/renewables-and-wholesale-electricity-prices-rewep<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Chien, A. A. & Lin, L. As grids reach 100% renewable at peak, growing curtailment of 8 gigawatts looms as a challenge to decarbonization. SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 4, 3\u201310 (2024).<\/p>\n Acun, B. et al. Unlocking the potential of renewable energy through curtailment prediction. In Climate Change AI Workshop at NeurIPS 2023 123 (2023).<\/p>\n 2023 special report on battery storage. CAISO https:\/\/www.caiso.com\/documents\/2023-special-report-on-battery-storage-jul-16-2024.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Gerke, B. F. et al. The California demand response potential study, phase 3: final report on the shift resource through 2030. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20357\/B7MS40<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n Yang, F. & Chien, A. A. ZCCloud: exploring wasted green power for high-performance computing. In Int. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS) 1051\u20131060 (IEEE, 2016).<\/p>\n Yang, F. & Chien, A. A. Large-scale and extreme-scale computing with stranded green power: opportunities and costs. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems 29, 1103\u20131116 (2017).<\/p>\n Putnam, M. & Perez, M. Solar potential analysis report. Minnesota Department of Commerce and the Minnesota Solar Pathways Project https:\/\/mn.gov\/commerce-stat\/pdfs\/solar-potential-analysis-report.pdf<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n Hoza, M. Wind and solar curtailments on the rise. Factset Insight https:\/\/insight.factset.com\/wind-and-solar-curtailments-on-the-rise<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n Data center load shape library: Electric Power Research Insitute https:\/\/www.epri.com\/research\/products\/3002033424<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Google to invest $40 billion in new Texas datacenters. Bloomberg News https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2025-11-14\/google-to-invest-40-billion-in-new-data-centers-in-texas<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Swinhoe, D. & Skidmore, Z. Meta announces 4 million sq ft, 2GW Louisiana data center campus. DCD https:\/\/www.datacenterdynamics.com\/en\/news\/meta-announces-4-million-sq-ft-louisiana-data-center-campus\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Generational growth: AI, data centers and the coming US power demand surge. Goldman Sachs https:\/\/www.goldmansachs.com\/pdfs\/insights\/pages\/generational-growth-ai-data-centers-and-the-coming-us-power-surge\/report.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Norris, T., Profeta, T., Patino-Echeverri, D. & Cowie-Haskell, A. Rethinking load growth: assessing the potential for integration of large flexible loads in US power systems. Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability, Duke University https:\/\/nicholasinstitute.duke.edu\/publications\/rethinking-load-growth<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Lin, L. et al. Exploding AI power use: an opportunity to rethink grid planning and management. In Proc. 15th ACM Int. Conf. Future and Sustainable Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201924) 434\u2013441 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Lin, L. & Chien, A. A. Middlebox: unlocking datacenter growth and grid decarbonization. In Proc. Symposium Cloud Computing (SoCC \u201825) 134\u2013148 (ACM, 2025).<\/p>\n Advantages and challenges of nuclear-powered data centers. United States Department of Energy https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/ne\/articles\/advantages-and-challenges-nuclear-powered-data-centers<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Macknick, J., Newmark, R., Heath, G. & Hallett, K. A review of operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies. NREL https:\/\/docs.nlr.gov\/docs\/fy11osti\/50900.pdf<\/a> (2011).<\/p>\n Reig, P. What\u2019s the difference between water use and water consumption? World Resources Institute Commentary https:\/\/www.wri.org\/insights\/whats-difference-between-water-use-and-water-consumption<\/a> (2013).<\/p>\n Environmental sustainability report 2025. Microsoft https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/corporate-responsibility\/sustainability\/report<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Reig, P., Luo, T., Christensen, E. & Sinistore, J. Guidance for calculating water use embedded in purchased electricity. World Resources Institute https:\/\/www.wri.org\/research\/guidance-calculating-water-use-embedded-purchased-electricity<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n Siddik, M. A. B., Shehabi, A., Rao, P. & Marston, L. T. Spatially and temporally detailed water and carbon footprints of U.S. electricity generation and use. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2024WR038350 (2024).<\/p>\n Siddik, M. A. B., Shehabi, A. & Marston, L. The environmental footprint of data centers in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064017 (2021).<\/p>\n Shehabi, A. et al. United States data center energy usage report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory https:\/\/eta.lbl.gov\/publications\/united-states-data-center-energy<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n Karimi, L. et al. Water-energy tradeoffs in data centers: a case study in hot-arid climates. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 181, 106194 (2022).<\/p>\n Frost, K. & Hua, I. Quantifying spatiotemporal impacts of the interaction of water scarcity and water use by the global semiconductor manufacturing industry. Water Resour. Ind. 22, 100115 (2019).<\/p>\n PUB, Singapore\u2019s National Water Agency. Best Practice Guide in Water Efficiency: Wafer Fabrication and Semiconductor Sector https:\/\/go.nature.com\/4p0UHk1<\/a> (PUB, 2022).<\/p>\n Han, Y., Li, P., Wierman, A. & Ren, S. Small bottle, big pipe: quantifying and addressing the impact of data centers on public water systems. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2603.02705<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Ahmed, S. N., Bencala, K., Nummer, S., Schultz, C. L. & Seck, A. 2025 Washington Metropolitan Area water supply study: demand and resource availability forecast for the year 2050. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin https:\/\/www.potomacriver.org\/publications\/2025-washington-metropolitan-area-water-supply-study-demand-and-resource-availability-forecast-for-the-year-2050\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Water use by data centers in the Susquehanna River Basin: FAQ. Susquehanna River Basin Commission https:\/\/www.srbc.gov\/about\/news\/docs\/srbc-data-centers-faq.pdf<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n H\u00f6lzle, U. Our commitment to climate-conscious data center cooling. The Keyword https:\/\/blog.google\/outreach-initiatives\/sustainability\/our-commitment-to-climate-conscious-data-center-cooling\/<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n Google environmental report 2025. Google https:\/\/www.gstatic.com\/gumdrop\/sustainability\/google-2025-environmental-report.pdf<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Principles for sustainable water use by data centers: building more effective public\u2013private collaboration. Water-AI Nexus https:\/\/water-ai-nexus.org\/insight-report<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Our contribution to a global environmental standard for AI. Mistral AI https:\/\/mistral.ai\/news\/our-contribution-to-a-global-environmental-standard-for-ai<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Firestone, D. et al. Azure accelerated networking: SmartNICs in the public cloud. In Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation (USENIX, 2018).<\/p>\n Li, H. et al. LeapIO: efficient and portable virtual NVMe storage on ARMSoCs. In Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS \u201820) (eds Larus, J. et al.) 591\u2013605 (2020).<\/p>\n Liguori, A. The Nitro Project – Next-Generation EC2 Infrastructure. aws https:\/\/pages.awscloud.com\/The-Nitro-Project-Next-Generation-EC2-Infrastructure_0119-CMP_OD.html<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n Nguyen, S., Zhou, B., Ding, Y. & Liu, S. Towards sustainable large language model serving. ACM SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 4, 134\u2013140 (2025).<\/p>\n Leviathan, Y., Kalman, M. & Matias, Y. Fast inference from transformers via speculative decoding. In Proc. 40th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML \u201823) (eds Krause, A. et al.) 795 (JMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n Demand response. PJM https:\/\/www.pjm.com\/markets-and-operations\/demand-response<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Zhang, Y., Paschalidis, I. C. & Coskun, A. K. Data center participation in demand response programs with quality-of-service guarantees. In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201919) 285\u2013302 (ACM, 2019).<\/p>\n Sun, Q., Ren, S., Wu, C. & Li, Z. An online incentive mechanism for emergency demand response in geo-distributed colocation data centers. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201916) 3 (ACM, 2016).<\/p>\n Wierman, A., Liu, Z., Liu, I. & Mohsenian-Rad, H. Opportunities and challenges for data center demand response. In Int. Green Computing Conf. 1\u201310 (IEEE, 2014).<\/p>\n Large flexible load task force. Electric Reliability Council of Texas https:\/\/www.ercot.com\/committees\/inactive\/lfltf<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n Barroso, L. A., H\u00f6lzle, U. & Ranganathan, P. The Datacenter as a Computer: Designing Warehouse-scale Machines (Springer Nature, 2026).<\/p>\n Investigating a higher renewables portfolio standard in California: Executive summary. Energy and Environmental Economics https:\/\/www.ethree.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/E3_Final_RPS_Report_2014_01_06_ExecutiveSummary-1.pdf<\/a> (2014).<\/p>\n Dominion Energy Virginia. RD214 – Dominion Energy\u00ae Virginia Electric and Power Company\u2019s Report of Its 2023 Integrated Resource Plan \u2013 May 1, 2023 https:\/\/rga.lis.virginia.gov\/Published\/2023\/RD214<\/a> (Dominion Energy Virginia, 2023).<\/p>\n Generation capacity statement 2023\u20132032. Eir Grid and Soni https:\/\/cms.eirgrid.ie\/sites\/default\/files\/publications\/19035-EirGrid-Generation-Capacity-Statement-Combined-2023-V5-Jan-2024.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n PJM load forecast report. PJM Resource Adequacy Planning Department https:\/\/www.pjm.com\/-\/media\/library\/reports-notices\/load-forecast\/2024-load-report.ashx<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Lin, L. & Chien, A. A. Adapting datacenter capacity for greener datacenters and grid. In Proc. 14th ACM Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201923) 200\u2013213 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Lin, L. & Chien, A. A. Distribution and management of datacenter load decoupling. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2511.08936<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Radovanovic, A. et al. Carbon-aware computing for datacenters. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 38, 1270\u20131280 (2021).<\/p>\n California ISO: today\u2019s outlook. CAISO https:\/\/www.caiso.com\/todays-outlook\/<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n Chien, A. A., Yang, F. & Zhang, C. Characterizing curtailed and uneconomic renewable power in the mid-continent independent system operator. AIMS Energy 6, 376\u2013401 (2018).<\/p>\n Kim, K., Yang, F., Zavala, V. & Chien, A. A. Data centers as dispatchable loads to harness stranded power. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 8, 208\u2013218 (2016).<\/p>\n Wilson, D. C. et al. An end-to-end hpc framework for dynamic power objectives. In Proc. Worksh. Int. Conf. High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis (SC-W \u201923) 1801\u20131811 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Norris, T. H., Profeta, T., Patino-Echeverri, D. & Cowie-Haskell, A. Rethinking load growth: assessing the potential for integration of large flexible loads in US power systems. Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability, Duke University https:\/\/nicholasinstitute.duke.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/publications\/rethinking-load-growth.pdf<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Document 32023l1791: Directive (EU) 2023\/1791 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023\/955. EurLEX https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/2023\/1791\/oj\/eng<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n I&M, Google filing to support reliability through demand response structure. Indiana Michigan Power https:\/\/www.indianamichiganpower.com\/company\/news\/view?releaseID=10359<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Zhang, W., Roald, L. A., Chien, A. A., Birge, J. R. & Zavala, V. M. Flexibility from networks of data centers: a market clearing formulation with virtual links. Electric Power Systems Res. 189, 106723 (2020).<\/p>\n Lindberg, J., Abdennadher, Y., Chen, J., Lesieutre, B. C. & Roald, L. A guide to reducing carbon emissions through data center geographical load shifting. In Proc. Twelfth ACM Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201921) 430-436 (ACM, 2021).<\/p>\n Lin, L. P. Decoupling and coordination: the keys to making AI datacenters constructive loads in renewable-dominated grids. PhD thesis, Univ. Chicago http:\/\/zccloud.cs.uchicago.edu\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Uptime institute global data center survey 2024. Uptime Institute https:\/\/datacenter.uptimeinstitute.com\/rs\/711-RIA-145\/images\/2024.GlobalDataCenterSurvey.Report.pdf<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Sustainability report. Meta https:\/\/sustainability.atmeta.com\/2024-sustainability-report\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Apple\u2019s water strategy. Apple https:\/\/www.apple.com\/environment\/pdf\/Apples_Water_Strategy.pdf<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Gupta, P. S., Hossen, M. R., Li, P., Ren, S. & Islam, M. A. A dataset for research on water sustainability. In Proc. 15th ACM Int. Conf. Future and Sustainable Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201924) 442\u2013446 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Wu, Y., Hua, I. & Ding, Y. Not all water consumption is equal: a water stress weighted metric for sustainable computing. SIGENERGY Energy Inform. Rev. 5, 84\u201390 (2025).<\/p>\n Van Zetten, J. D., Cholette, M. E. & Bamdad, K. Energy and carbon savings in data centres through liquid-to-chip cooling with differential temperature control. Adv. Appl. Energy 22, 100269 (2026).<\/p>\n Hershberg, K., Burnett, B., Roraff, J., Hopker, P. & Brune, M. The energy and water use impacts of building system design for data centers: design considerations for Oregon and Washington. PAE https:\/\/critfc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/data-center-report.pdf<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Islam, M. A. et al. Exploiting spatio-temporal diversity for water saving in geo-distributed data centers. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 6, 734\u2013746 (2018).<\/p>\n Islam, M. A., Ren, S., Quan, G., Shakir, M. Z. & Vasilakos, A. V. Water-constrained geographic load balancing in data centers. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TCC.2015.2453982<\/a> (2015).<\/p>\n Jiang, Y., Roy, R. B., Kanakagiri, R. & Tiwari, D. Waterwise: c-optimizing carbon- and water-footprint toward environmentally sustainable cloud computing. In Proc. 30th SIGPLAN Ann. Symp. Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP \u201925) 297\u2013311 (ACM, 2025).<\/p>\n FAQ: why does AI use water? Amazon https:\/\/sustainability.aboutamazon.com\/stories\/just-back-from-weftec-why-does-ai-use-water<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n de Chalendar, J. A., Taggart, J. & Benson, S. M. Tracking emissions in the U.S. electricity system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 25497\u201325502 (2019).<\/p>\n Acun, B. et al. Carbon Explorer: a holistic framework for designing carbon aware datacenters. In Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS 2023) Vol. 2, 118\u2013132 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Qureshi, A., Weber, R., Balakrishnan, H., Guttag, J. & Maggs, B. Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems. In Proc. Conf. Data Communications (SIGCOMM \u201909) 123\u2013134 (ACM, 2009).<\/p>\n Gao, P. X., Curtis, A. R., Wong, B. & Keshav, S. It\u2019s not easy being green. Proc. Conf. Applications, Technologies, Architectures and Protocols for Computer Communication (SIGCOMM \u201812) (eds Eggert, L. et al.) 211\u2013222 (ACM, 2012).<\/p>\n Li, P., Yang, J., Wierman, A. & Ren, S. Towards environmentally equitable AI via geographical load balancing. In Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Future and Sustainable Energy Systems (e-Energy \u201824) 291\u2013307 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Islam, M. J. & Ren, S. Equity-aware spatial-temporal workload shifting for sustainable AI data centers. In Proc. Worksh. Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning (NeurIPS \u201824) 33 (USENIX, 2024).<\/p>\n Pessach, D. & Shmueli, E. A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3494672<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n Ahmed, K., Islam, M. A., Ren, S. & Quan, G. Can data center become water self-sufficient? In Proc. 6th Worksh. Power-Aware Computing and Systems (HotPower \u201814) (USENIX, 2014).<\/p>\n Chen, S., Zhou, Z., Liu, F., Li, Z. & Ren, S. Cloudheat: an efficient online market mechanism for datacenter heat harvesting. ACM Trans. Model. Perform. Eval. Comput. Syst. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3199675<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n