{"id":121052,"date":"2026-07-28T06:03:25","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T06:03:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/121052\/"},"modified":"2026-07-28T06:03:25","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T06:03:25","slug":"microsoft-unveils-a-i-cybersecurity-tools","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/121052\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft Unveils A.I. Cybersecurity Tools"},"content":{"rendered":"

OpenAI sent shock waves across Silicon Valley last week when it revealed that two of its artificial intelligence technologies had gone rogue and hacked into a popular internet library<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The incident showed the unpredictable power of new A.I. systems and the growing importance of technology that can be used against A.I. attacks.<\/p>\n

On Monday, Microsoft added to the widening assortment of A.I. security tools with the release of systems designed to help businesses protect their computer networks.<\/p>\n

It is among a number of companies racing to take the same kind of advanced systems used to commit attacks and instead harness their power to prevent hacks. They are hoping to capitalize on rising concerns that A.I. presents a serious threat to computer infrastructure that security experts are just starting to come to grips with.<\/p>\n

Microsoft executives are among the many voices<\/a> in tech arguing that powerful cybersecurity systems should be more widely distributed so that more organizations can better defend themselves.<\/p>\n

That viewpoint runs counter to growing concerns among some tech executives and officials in Washington that new A.I. systems need to be carefully monitored or kept away from the public because they can be such effective hacking tools.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe cat is out of the bag,\u201d said Hayete Gallot, an executive vice president at Microsoft who oversees the company\u2019s security efforts.<\/p>\n

Microsoft\u2019s new A.I. model, MAI-Cyber-1-Flash, has been trained specifically for cybersecurity, the company said. The system learned its skills partly by analyzing decades of data that Microsoft collected when responding to hacking incidents experienced by its customers.<\/p>\n

Microsoft has unusual access to security data, because its products, such as the Windows operating system, Outlook email and Azure cloud computing, are so widely used and are frequent targets of cyberattacks, said Mustafa Suleyman, who oversees the development of Microsoft\u2019s A.I. models.<\/p>\n

Unlike other leading A.I. companies, Microsoft did not share the new model with independent testers for evaluation before releasing the technology. But the company said it expected that the model integrated into its security tools would top the leaderboard for a standard benchmark test called CyberGYM after it was released on Monday, surpassing offerings from OpenAI and Anthropic.<\/p>\n

Microsoft said the price of using the new system was about half the price of other leading technologies, which are more expensive partly because they were developed to do many things, not just cybersecurity work. The company said it effectively handled 90 percent of queries, meaning the more expensive models would be necessary only 10 percent of the time. Mr. Suleyman said Microsoft had focused on lowering the costs so that the model could be deployed more quickly and more widely.<\/p>\n

MAI-Cyber-1-Flash will feed into another new Microsoft tool, Project Perception. It transforms various A.I. models into teams of \u201cagents\u201d designed to find and repair network vulnerabilities. A.I. agents<\/a> are digital assistants that can use other software to perform various tasks largely on their own. In some cases, Microsoft\u2019s agents will be able to imitate hackers.<\/p>\n

The A.I. security threat has emerged over the past year or so as A.I. companies have built systems that are particularly good at writing computer code. When Anthropic, for example, introduced an A.I. system in April, the company said it had used the technology to find thousands of security holes that had gone undetected in popular software systems for years.<\/p>\n

Arguing that the A.I. system was too dangerous for wide release, Anthropic limited the release of this enormously expensive technology to a small number of organizations so that they could use the technology to defend the internet\u2019s vital infrastructure.<\/p>\n

Not long after, OpenAI<\/a> and Google<\/a> said they, too, were sharing similar technology with only a group of partners. The White House also started to explore government oversight<\/a> of such technologies. Among the possible plans was a formal government review process for new A.I. models.<\/p>\n

The field and norms are rapidly evolving. In an interview on July 16, Microsoft\u2019s corporate vice president, David Weston, said it was \u201creally important for us to make sure everyone has the capability.\u201d But when the product was announced Monday, the company limited the initial release to businesses and individuals who used a third Microsoft security tool, MDASH, which is designed for finding and closing security holes in software.<\/p>\n

As companies try to control the use of their latest models, experts have shown that other technologies could help drive malicious attacks on computer networks.<\/p>\n

Last month, researchers at the University of Toronto said they had found a way<\/a> to use freely available A.I. technologies to create a dangerous computer \u201cworm\u201d capable of targeting any known flaw in the world\u2019s computers.<\/p>\n

\u201cA lot of these models are getting better,\u201d Mr. Weston said. \u201cWhat concerns me is not the model du jour, but that the capability is more widespread.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the weeks since, two Chinese start-ups have released technologies that are nearly as powerful<\/a> as leading systems from Anthropic and OpenAI.<\/p>\n

(The New York Times has sued<\/a> OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems. The two companies have denied those claims.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"OpenAI sent shock waves across Silicon Valley last week when it revealed that two of its artificial intelligence…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":121053,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[405,1556,25,7537,1586,1555,11248,146,61269,1588,27618],"class_list":["post-121052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-agentic-ai","tag-ai-agents","tag-anthropic-ai-llc","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-artificial-intelligence-agents","tag-computer-security","tag-computers-and-the-internet","tag-cyberattacks-and-hackers","tag-microsoft-corp","tag-mustafa","tag-openai-labs","tag-suleyman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=121052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121052\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/121053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=121052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=121052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=121052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}