Posting through X, noted investor Michael Burry\u00a0wrote<\/a> \u201cEvil incarnate\u201d in response to a user\u2019s post about the said practice, and Tesla and SpaceX founder\u00a0said<\/a> he had asked the SpaceXAI team to preserve any rare books in a library and \u201cscan them the hard way vs just cutting off the spine and scanning.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cAnthropic maintains that it is entitled to train for free on all the world\u2019s output, even if the author objects. But if a competitor trains on Anthropic\u2019s output after paying for it, that is IP theft. The hypocrisy is breathtaking,\u201d venture capitalist and chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology David Sacks said in an\u00a0X post<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n AI copyright suits are not new. Over the past three years, authors, news publishers, artists and image libraries have filed dozens of lawsuits against AI companies, alleging they copied copyrighted books, articles, images and other creative works without permission to train generative AI models.\u00a0<\/p>\n The outcomes have been mixed. The New York Times\u2019 lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft remains ongoing, while Getty Images\u2019 legal battle with Stability AI is also still being litigated in the U.S. after a mixed outcome in the U.K.\u00a0<\/p>\n For updates and corrections, email newsroom[at]stocktwits[dot]com.<\/p>\n Read Next:\u00a0Chinese DRAM Maker CXMT Is Now Worth More Than Intel After Blistering Shanghai Debut: SanDisk, Micron Feel The Heat<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"Follow](\"https:\/\/chunks-prd.stocktwits-cdn.com\/_next\/static\/media\/google-news-icon.d9c2bfd1.svg\"\/){kind=icon}
<\/a><\/p>\n