{"id":126812,"date":"2026-08-01T16:05:39","date_gmt":"2026-08-01T16:05:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/126812\/"},"modified":"2026-08-01T16:05:39","modified_gmt":"2026-08-01T16:05:39","slug":"artificial-intelligence-for-representing-and-characterizing-quantum-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/126812\/","title":{"rendered":"Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systems"},"content":{"rendered":"

Van Damme, J. et al. Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers. Nature 634, 74\u201379 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shaw, A. L. et al. Benchmarking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analogue quantum simulator. Nature 628, 71\u201377 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Manetsch, H. J. et al. tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits. Nature 647, 60 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

King, A. D. et al. Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation. Science 388, 199\u2013204 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bourgund, D. et al. Formation of individual stripes in a mixed-dimensional cold-atom Fermi\u2013Hubbard system. Nature 637, 57\u201362 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xu, S. et al. Non-Abelian braiding of Fibonacci anyons with a superconducting processor. Nat. Phys. 20, 1469\u20131475 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Manovitz, T. et al. Quantum coarsening and collective dynamics on a programmable simulator. Nature 638, 86\u201392 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Andersen, T. I. et al. Thermalization and criticality on an analogue\u2013digital quantum simulator. Nature 638, 79\u201385 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

DeCross, M. et al. Computational power of random quantum circuits in arbitrary geometries. Phys. Rev. X 15, 021052 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626, 58\u201365 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638, 920\u2013926 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gao, D. et al. Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105-qubit Zuchongzhi 3.0 processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 090601 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Preskill, J. Beyond NISQ: the megaquop machine. ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 6, 18 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Eisert, J. & Preskill, J. Mind the gaps: the fraught road to quantum advantage. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2510.19928<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Or\u00fas, R. Tensor networks for complex quantum systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 538\u2013550 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aaronson, S. & Gottesman, D. Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bravyi, S. & Gosset, D. Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by Clifford gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250501 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aharonov, D., Gao, X., Landau, Z., Liu, Y. & Vazirani, U. A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy random circuit sampling. In Proc. 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 945\u2013957 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n

Gebhart, V. et al. Learning quantum systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 141\u2013156 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Radford, A. et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Preprint at https:\/\/paperswithcode.com\/paper\/improving-language-understanding-by<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n

Anshu, A. & Arunachalam, S. A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 59\u201369 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R., Torlai, G., Albert, V. V. & Preskill, J. Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems. Science 377, eabk3333 (2022).\u00a0First to prove that a classical algorithm can predict ground-state properties of a gapped phase with polynomial sample and time complexity.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cho, G. & Kim, D. Machine learning on quantum experimental data toward solving quantum many-body problems. Nat. Commun. 15, 7552 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, Y.-D., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y. & Chiribella, G. Learning quantum properties from short-range correlations using multi-task networks. Nat. Commun. 15, 8796 (2024).\u00a0A multi-task learning model for predicting quantum properties, which can be further used for transfer learning and out-of-distribution test.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qian, Y., Du, Y., He, Z., Hsieh, M.-H. & Tao, D. Multimodal deep representation learning for quantum cross-platform verification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 130601 (2024).A multimodal deep network for cross-platform quantum verification that jointly processes heterogeneous measurement data from different quantum hardware.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Du, Y., Hsieh, M.-H. & Tao, D. Efficient learning for linear properties of bounded-gate quantum circuits. Nat. Commun. 16, 3790 (2025).\u00a0The first machine-learning algorithm with provable sample-complexity guarantees for predicting linear properties of bounded-gate quantum circuits.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Eisert, J. et al. Quantum certification and benchmarking. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 382\u2013390 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Alexeev, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence for quantum computing. Nat. Commun. 16, 10829 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cerezo, M. et al. Variational quantum algorithms. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 625\u2013644 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dawid, A. et al. Machine learning in quantum sciences (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2025).<\/p>\n

Arunachalam, S. & de Wolf, R. Guest Column: A survey of quantum learning theory. ACM SIGACT News 48, 41\u201367 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carleo, G. et al. Machine learning and the physical sciences. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045002 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Das Sarma, S., Deng, D.-L. & Duan, L.-M. Machine learning meets quantum physics. Phys. Today 72, 48\u201354 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wetzel, S. J., Ha, S., Iten, R., Klopotek, M. & Liu, Z. Interpretable machine learning in physics: a review. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2503.23616<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Acampora, G. et al. Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectives. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2505.23860<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Krenn, M., Landgraf, J., Foesel, T. & Marquardt, F. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies. Phys. Rev. A 107, 010101 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Varela, J. M., de Palhares Jr, A. B. & Duarte, D. H. Entanglement detection and quantification through machine learning: a comprehensive review. Braz. J. Phys. 56, 25 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Melko, R. G. & Carrasquilla, J. Language models for quantum simulation. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 11\u201318 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carrasquilla, J. & Torlai, G. How to use neural networks to investigate quantum many-body physics. PRX Quantum 2, 040201 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lange, H., Van de Walle, A., Abedinnia, A. & Bohrdt, A. From architectures to applications: a review of neural quantum states. Quantum Sci. Tech. 9, 040501 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bharti, K. et al. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015004 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Du, Y. et al. A Gentle Introduction to Quantum Machine Learning (Springer, 2025).<\/p>\n

Dunjko, V. & Briegel, H. J. Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 074001 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Krenn, M., Malik, M., Fickler, R., Lapkiewicz, R. & Zeilinger, A. Automated search for new quantum experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 090405 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Melnikov, A. A. et al. Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1221\u20131226 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sachdev, S. Quantum phase transitions. Phys. World\u00a012, 33 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).<\/p>\n

Elben, A. et al. The randomized measurement toolbox. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 9\u201324 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhu, Y. et al. Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networks. Nat. Commun. 13, 6222 (2022).\u00a0Uses generative query networks to build implicit, query-driven representations of quantum states for downstream property prediction.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, H. et al. Attention to quantum complexity. Sci. Adv. 11, eadu0059 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A. & Talwalkar, A. Foundations of Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2018).<\/p>\n

Bishop, C. M. & Nasrabadi, N. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Vol. 4 (Springer, 2006).<\/p>\n

Zou, H. & Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67, 301\u2013320 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050\u20131057 (2020).\u00a0Enables prediction of quantum properties from a number of measurements logarithmic in the number of target properties.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Grafakos, L. Classical Fourier Analysis (Springer, 2008).<\/p>\n

Lewis, L. et al. Improved machine learning algorithm for predicting ground state properties. Nat. Commun. 15, 895 (2024).\u00a0Reduces the sample complexity for predicting ground state properties of gapped local Hamiltonians from polynomial in system size to logarithmic.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wanner, M., Lewis, L., Bhattacharyya, C., Dubhashi, D. & Gheorghiu, A. Predicting ground state properties: constant sample complexity and deep learning algorithms. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33962\u201334024 (Curran Associates, 2024).<\/p>\n

Che, Y., Gneiting, C. & Nori, F. Exponentially improved efficient machine learning for quantum many-body states with provable guarantees. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033035 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

\u0160m\u00edd, \u0160 & Bondesan, R. Efficient learning of long-range and equivariant quantum systems. Quantum 9, 1597 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

\u0160m\u00edd, \u0160. & Bondesan, R. Accurate learning of equivariant quantum systems from a single ground state. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2405.12309<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Schuld, M., Sweke, R. & Meyer, J. J. Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models. Phys. Rev. A 103, 032430 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vidal, J. G. & Theis, D. O. Input redundancy for parameterized quantum circuits. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1901.11434<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n

Schreiber, F. J., Eisert, J. & Meyer, J. J. Classical surrogates for quantum learning models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100803 (2023).\u00a0Shows that broad families of parameterized quantum learning models admit classical surrogates with provable approximation guarantees.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Landman, J., Thabet, S., Dalyac, C., Mhiri, H. & Kashefi, E. Classically approximating variational quantum machine learning with random Fourier features. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2210.13200<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Sweke, R. et al. Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learning. Quantum 9, 1640 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gan, B. Y., Huang, P.-W., Gil-Fuster, E. & Rebentrost, P. Concept learning of parameterized quantum models from limited measurements. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2408.05116<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Liao, W.-Y. et al. Demonstration of efficient predictive surrogates for large-scale quantum processors. Nat. Commun. 17, 4731 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Servedio, R. A. & Gortler, S. J. Equivalences and separations between quantum and classical learnability. SIAM J. Comput. 33, 1067\u20131092 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gyurik, C. & Dunjko, V. On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical data. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2208.06339<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Gyurik, C. & Dunjko, V. Exponential separations between classical and quantum learners. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2306.16028<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Molteni, R., Gyurik, C. & Dunjko, V. Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data. npj Quantum Inf. 12, 19 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bouland, A. et al. Public-key pseudoentanglement and the hardness of learning ground state entanglement structure. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2311.12017<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Bouland, A., Zhang, C. & Zhou, Z. On the hardness of learning ground state entanglement of geometrically local Hamiltonians. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2411.04353<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Thabet, S., Monbroussou, L., Mamon, E. Z. & Landman, J. When quantum and classical models disagree: learning beyond minimum norm least square. npj Quantum Inf. 12, 81 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gil-Fuster, E., Gyurik, C., Perez-Salinas, A. & Dunjko, V. On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning models. In Proc. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201925) (Curran Associates, 2025).<\/p>\n

Sadoune, N., Giudici, G., Liu, K. & Pollet, L. Unsupervised interpretable learning of phases from many-qubit systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013082 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Che, Y., Gneiting, C., Wang, X. & Nori, F. Quantum circuit complexity and unsupervised machine learning of topological order. Nat. Commun. 17, 5179 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dawid, A. Machine Learning in Quantum Sciences (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2025).<\/p>\n

Rocchetto, A. Stabiliser states are efficiently PAC-learnable. Quantum Inf. Comput. 18, 541\u2013552 (2018).<\/p>\n

MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Grewal, S., Iyer, V., Kretschmer, W. & Liang, D. Efficient learning of quantum states prepared with few non-Clifford gates. Quantum 9, 1907 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. & Hamma, A. Learning t-doped stabilizer states. Quantum 8, 1361 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Landau, Z. & Liu, Y. Learning quantum states prepared by shallow circuits in polynomial time. In Proc. 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC \u201925) 1828\u20131838 (ACM, 2025).<\/p>\n

Huang, H.-Y. et al. Learning shallow quantum circuits. In Proc. 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC \u201924) 1343\u20131351 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n

Huang, H.-Y., Chen, S. & Preskill, J. Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processes. PRX Quantum 4, 040337 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, S. et al. Predicting quantum channels over general product distributions. In Proc. 38th Conference on Learning Theory (COLT ’25) 986\u20131007 (PMLR, 2025).<\/p>\n

Pouyanfar, S. et al. A survey on deep learning: Algorithms, techniques, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 1\u201336 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016).<\/p>\n

Wang, H. et al. TorchQuantum case study for robust quantum circuits. In Proc. 41st IEEE\/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD \u201922) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3508352.3561118<\/a> (ACM, 2022).<\/p>\n

Carrasquilla, J., Torlai, G., Melko, R. G. & Aolita, L. Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 155\u2013161 (2019).\u00a0Reduces quantum state tomography to the unsupervised learning of outcome statistics of an informationally complete measurement.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, A. W. R., Gray, J. & Kim, M. S. Efficient quantum state sample tomography with basis-dependent neural networks. PRX Quantum 2, 020348 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mohseni, N., F\u00f6sel, T., Guo, L., Navarrete-Benlloch, C. & Marquardt, F. Deep learning of quantum many-body dynamics via random driving. Quantum 6, 714 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mohseni, N., Shi, J., Byrnes, T. & Hartmann, M. J. Deep learning of many-body observables and quantum information scrambling. Quantum 8, 1417 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Torlai, G. et al. Neural-network quantum state tomography. Nat. Phys. 14, 447\u2013450 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cha, P. et al. Attention-based quantum tomography. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 3, 01LT01 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schmale, T., Reh, M. & G\u00e4rttner, M. Efficient quantum state tomography with convolutional neural networks. npj Quantum Inf. 8, 115 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ahmed, S., Mu\u00f1oz, C. S., Nori, F. & Kockum, A. F. Quantum state tomography with conditional generative adversarial networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140502 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ahmed, S., S\u00e1nchez Mu\u00f1oz, C., Nori, F. & Kockum, A. F. Classification and reconstruction of optical quantum states with deep neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033278 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Du, Y. et al. ShadowNet for data-centric quantum system learning. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2308.11290<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6000\u20136010 (Curran Associates, 2017).<\/p>\n

Zhang, X. et al. Direct fidelity estimation of quantum states using machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 130503 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qin, H. et al. Experimental direct quantum fidelity learning via a data-driven approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 190801 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Elben, A. et al. Cross-platform verification of intermediate scale quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010504 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, Y.-D., Zhu, Y., Bai, G., Wang, Y. & Chiribella, G. Quantum similarity testing with convolutional neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 210601 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vadali, A., Kshirsagar, R., Shyamsundar, P. & Perdue, G. N. Quantum circuit fidelity estimation using machine learning. Quantum Mach. Intell. 6, 1 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, Y.-C. & Yung, M.-H. Transforming Bell\u2019s inequalities into state classifiers with machine learning. npj Quantum Inf. 4, 34 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gao, J. et al. Experimental machine learning of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 240501 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865\u2013942 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harney, C., Pirandola, S., Ferraro, A. & Paternostro, M. Entanglement classification via neural network quantum states. New J. Phys. 22, 045001 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, G. & Cheng, S. Detecting quantum entanglement with unsupervised learning. Quantum Sci. Tech. 7, 015005 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, C., Ren, C., Lin, H. & Lu, H. Entanglement structure detection via machine learning. Quantum Sci. Tech. 6, 035017 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Z., Lin, X. & Wei, Z. Certifying unknown genuine multipartite entanglement by neural networks. Quantum Sci. Tech. 8, 035029 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, Y. et al. Direct entanglement detection of quantum systems using machine learning. npj Quantum Inf. 11, 29 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gao, X. et al. Correlation-pattern-based continuous variable entanglement detection through neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 220202 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Koutny`, D. et al. Deep learning of quantum entanglement from incomplete measurements. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd7131 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lin, X., Chen, Z. & Wei, Z. Quantifying quantum entanglement via a hybrid quantum-classical machine learning framework. Phys. Rev. A 107, 062409 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rieger, M., Reh, M. & G\u00e4rttner, M. Sample-efficient estimation of entanglement entropy through supervised learning. Phys. Rev. A 109, 012403 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Taghadomi, N., Mani, A., Fahim, A., Bakoui, A. & Salami, M. S. Quantum Mach. Intell. 7, 40 (2025).<\/p>\n

Krawczyk, M., Paw\u0142owski, J., Ma\u015bka, M. M. & Roszak, K. Data-driven criteria for quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. A 109, 022405 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cimini, V., Barbieri, M., Treps, N., Walschaers, M. & Parigi, V. Neural networks for detecting multimode Wigner negativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 160504 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mello, A. F., Lami, G. & Collura, M. Retrieving nonstabilizerness with neural networks. Phys. Rev. A 111, 012440 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carrasquilla, J. & Melko, R. G. Machine learning phases of matter. Nat. Phys. 13, 431 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van Nieuwenburg, E. P., Liu, Y.-H. & Huber, S. D. Learning phase transitions by confusion. Nat. Phys. 13, 435 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bohrdt, A. et al. Analyzing nonequilibrium quantum states through snapshots with artificial neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 150504 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Miles, C. et al. Machine learning discovery of new phases in programmable quantum simulator snapshots. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013026 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, H. et al. Experimental demonstration of adversarial examples in learning topological phases. Nat. Commun. 13, 4993 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jiang, S., Lu, S. & Deng, D.-L. Adversarial machine learning phases of matter. Quantum Front. 2, 15 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Skinner, B., Ruhman, J. & Nahum, A. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y., Chen, X. & Fisher, M. P. A. Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. B 100, 134306 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Barratt, F., Agrawal, U., Potter, A. C., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Vasseur, R. Transitions in the learnability of global charges from local measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 200602 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ippoliti, M. & Khemani, V. Learnability transitions in monitored quantum dynamics via eavesdropper\u2019s classical shadows. PRX Quantum 5, 020304 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Akhtar, A. A., Hu, H.-Y. & You, Y.-Z. Measurement-induced criticality is tomographically optimal. Phys. Rev. B 109, 094209 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Agrawal, U., Lopez-Piqueres, J., Vasseur, R., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Potter, A. C. Observing quantum measurement collapse as a learnability phase transition. Phys. Rev. X 14, 041012 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dehghani, H., Lavasani, A., Hafezi, M. & Gullans, M. J. Neural-network decoders for measurement induced phase transitions. Nat. Commun. 14, 2918 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, H. et al. Learning measurement-induced phase transitions using attention. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2508.15895<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Hou, W. et al. Machine learning the effects of many quantum measurements. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2509.08890<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Garratt, S. J. & Altman, E. Probing postmeasurement entanglement without postselection. PRX Quantum 5, 030311 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aaronson, S. Shadow tomography of quantum states. In Proc. 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC \u201918) 325\u2013338 (ACM, 2018).<\/p>\n

Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1798\u20131828 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xiao, T., Huang, J., Li, H., Fan, J. & Zeng, G. Intelligent certification for quantum simulators via machine learning. npj Quantum Inf. 8, 138 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mohseni, N., Marquardt, F. & Schmidt, P. Transfer learning in predicting quantum many-body dynamics: from physical observables to entanglement entropy. Quantum Sci. Tech. 10, 025038 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van Engelen, J. E. & Hoos, H. H. A survey on semi-supervised learning. Mach. Learn. 109, 373\u2013440 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tang, Y., Yang, N., Long, M. & Yan, J. Ssl4q: semi-supervised learning of quantum data with application to quantum state classification. In Proc. Forty-First International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML \u201924) (PMLR, 2024).<\/p>\n

Wu, D., Wang, L. & Zhang, P. Solving statistical mechanics using variational autoregressive networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 080602 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sharir, O., Levine, Y., Wies, N., Carleo, G. & Shashua, A. Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 020503 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhong, L., Guo, C. & Wang, X. Quantum state tomography inspired by language modeling. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2212.04940<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Zhang, Z. & You, Y.-Z. Observing Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019s cat with artificial intelligence: emergent classicality from information bottleneck. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 015051 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carleo, G. & Troyer, M. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355, 602\u2013606 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Czischek, S., Moss, M. S., Radzihovsky, M., Merali, E. & Melko, R. G. Data-enhanced variational Monte Carlo simulations for Rydberg atom arrays. Phys. Rev. B 105, 205108 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moss, M. S. et al. Enhancing variational Monte Carlo simulations using a programmable quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. A 109, 032410 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lange, H. et al. Transformer neural networks and quantum simulators: a hybrid approach for simulating strongly correlated systems. Quantum 9, 1675 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Torlai, G. et al. Quantum process tomography with unsupervised learning and tensor networks. Nat. Commun. 14, 2858 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ahmed, S., Quijandr\u00eda, F. & Kockum, A. F. Gradient-descent quantum process tomography by learning Kraus operators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 150402 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhu, Y., Wu, Y.-D., Liu, Q., Wang, Y. & Chiribella, G. Predictive modelling of quantum process with neural networks. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2308.08815<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Hartmann, M. J. & Carleo, G. Neural-network approach to dissipative quantum many-body dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250502 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carrasquilla, J. Machine learning for quantum matter. Adv. Phys. X 5, 1797528 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harrington, P. M., Mueller, E. J. & Murch, K. W. Engineered dissipation for quantum information science. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 660\u2013671 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dugan, O. M., Lu, P. Y., Dangovski, R., Luo, D. & Soljacic, M. Q-Flow: generative modeling for differential equations of open quantum dynamics with normalizing flows. In Proc. 40th International Conference on Machine Learning 8879\u20138901 (PMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n

Campaioli, F., Cole, J. H. & Hapuarachchi, H. Quantum master equations: tips and tricks for quantum optics, quantum computing, and beyond. PRX Quantum 5, 020202 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Valenti, A., van Nieuwenburg, E., Huber, S. & Greplova, E. Hamiltonian learning for quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033092 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Valenti, A., Jin, G., L\u00e9onard, J., Huber, S. D. & Greplova, E. Scalable Hamiltonian learning for large-scale out-of-equilibrium quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 105, 023302 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nandy, S., Schmitt, M., Bukov, M. & Lenar\u010di\u010d, Z. Reconstructing effective Hamiltonians from nonequilibrium thermal and prethermal steady states. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023160 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Che, L. et al. Learning quantum Hamiltonians from single-qubit measurements. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023246 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Proctor, T., Young, K., Baczewski, A. D. & Blume-Kohout, R. Benchmarking quantum computers. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 1\u201314 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hothem, D., Miller, A. & Proctor, T. What is my quantum computer good for? Quantum capability learning with physics-aware neural networks. In Proc. The Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, 2024).<\/p>\n

Hartnett, G. S. et al. Learning to rank quantum circuits for hardware-optimized performance enhancement. Quantum 8, 1542 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cai, Z. et al. Quantum error mitigation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045005 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, C., Park, K. D. & Rhee, J.-K. Quantum error mitigation with artificial neural network. IEEE Access 8, 188853\u2013188860 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sack, S. H. & Egger, D. J. Large-scale quantum approximate optimization on nonplanar graphs with machine learning noise mitigation. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013223 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bao, T. et al. Beyond circuit connections: a non-message passing graph transformer approach for quantum error mitigation. In Proc. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201925) (OpenReview, 2025).<\/p>\n

Liao, H. et al. Machine learning for practical quantum error mitigation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1478\u20131486 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liao, M., Zhu, Y., Chiribella, G. & Yang, Y. Noise-agnostic quantum error mitigation with data augmented neural models. npj Quantum Inf. 11, 8 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sweke, R., Kesselring, M. S., van Nieuwenburg, E. P. L. & Eisert, J. Reinforcement learning decoders for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 025005 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, Y. et al. Learning to decode logical circuits. Nat. Comput. Sci. 5, 1158\u20131167 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, H. et al. Transformer-QEC: quantum error correction code decoding with transferable transformers. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2311.16082<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Bausch, J. et al. Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors. Nature 635, 834\u2013840 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cao, H., Pan, F., Feng, D., Wang, Y. & Zhang, P. Generative decoding for quantum error-correcting codes. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2503.21374<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Olle, J., Zen, R., Puviani, M. & Marquardt, F. Simultaneous discovery of quantum error correction codes and encoders with a noise-aware reinforcement learning agent. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 126 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zeng, Y., Qin, W., Chen, Y.-H., Gneiting, C. & Nori, F. Neural-network-based design of approximate Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 060601 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cervera-Lierta, A., Kottmann, J. S. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Meta-variational quantum eigensolver: learning energy profiles of parameterized Hamiltonians for quantum simulation. PRX Quantum 2, 020329 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jain, N., Coyle, B., Kashefi, E. & Kumar, N. Graph neural network initialisation of quantum approximate optimisation. Quantum 6, 861 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Luo, D., Shen, J., Dangovski, R. & Soljacic, M. Quack: accelerating gradient-based quantum optimization with Koopman operator learning. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25662\u201325692 (Curran Associates, 2023).<\/p>\n

Lee, J., Cho, J. & Kim, S. Q-MAML: quantum model-agnostic meta-learning for variational quantum algorithms. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 39, 18137\u201318144 (AAAI, 2025).<\/p>\n

Zhang, S.-X., Hsieh, C.-Y., Zhang, S. & Yao, H. Neural predictor based quantum architecture search. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 045027 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

He, Z. et al. A GNN-based predictor for quantum architecture search. Quantum Inf. Process. 22, 128 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qian, Y., Wang, X., Du, Y., Luo, Y. & Tao, D. MG-Net: learn to customize QAOA with circuit depth awareness. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33691\u201333725 (Curran Associates, 2024).<\/p>\n

F\u00f6sel, T., Niu, M. Y., Marquardt, F. & Li, L. Quantum circuit optimization with deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2103.07585<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n

F\u00fcrrutter, F., Mu\u00f1oz-Gil, G. & Briegel, H. J. Quantum circuit synthesis with diffusion models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 515\u2013524 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ruiz, F. J. et al. Quantum circuit optimization with AlphaTensor. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 374\u2013385 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arnold, J. & Sch\u00e4fer, F. Replacing neural networks by optimal analytical predictors for the detection of phase transitions. Phys. Rev. X 12, 031044 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gao, X. & Duan, L.-M. Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 662 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sharir, O., Shashua, A. & Carleo, G. Neural tensor contractions and the expressive power of deep neural quantum states. Phys. Rev. B 106, 205136 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhao, L., Guo, N., Luo, M.-X. & Rebentrost, P. Provable learning of quantum states with graphical models. Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 013109 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, T.-H., Soleimanifar, M., Bergamaschi, T. & Preskill, J. When can classical neural networks represent quantum states? Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2410.23152<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Iten, R., Metger, T., Wilming, H., del Rio, L. & Renner, R. Discovering physical concepts with neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010508 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Miles, C. et al. Correlator convolutional neural networks as an interpretable architecture for image-like quantum matter data. Nat. Commun. 12, 3905 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Flam-Shepherd, D. et al. Learning interpretable representations of entanglement in quantum optics experiments using deep generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 544\u2013554 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Frohnert, F. & van Nieuwenburg, E. Explainable representation learning of small quantum states. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 015001 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cybi\u0144ski, K. et al. Characterizing out-of-distribution generalization of neural networks: application to the disordered Su\u2013Schrieffer\u2013Heeger model. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 6, 015014 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

de Schoulepnikoff, P., Mu\u00f1oz-Gil, G., Nautrup, H. P. & Briegel, H. J. Interpretable representation learning of quantum data enabled by probabilistic variational autoencoders. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2506.11982<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Cao, Y. et al. A comprehensive survey of AI-generated content (AIGC): a history of generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2303.04226<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Chang, Y. et al. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 15, 1\u201345 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1877\u20131901 (Curran Associates, 2020).<\/p>\n

Kaplan, J. et al. Scaling laws for neural language models. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2001.08361<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n

Wang, H., Weber, M., Izaac, J. & Lin, C. Y.-Y. Predicting properties of quantum systems with conditional generative models. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2211.16943<\/a> (2022). Trains a conditional generative transformer on data from a family of quantum states, enabling property prediction for both unseen states and new observables without retraining.<\/p>\n

Zhang, Y.-H. & Di Ventra, M. Transformer quantum state: a multipurpose model for quantum many-body problems. Phys. Rev. B 107, 075147 (2023).\u00a0A single transformer-based neural quantum state that covers entire phase diagrams within one model and transfers to new Hamiltonians via fine-tuning.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

An, Z., Wu, J., Yang, M., Zhou, D. L. & Zeng, B. Unified quantum state tomography and Hamiltonian learning: a language-translation-like approach for quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 014037 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yao, J. & You, Y.-Z. ShadowGPT: learning to solve quantum many-body problems from randomized measurements. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2411.03285<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Fitzek, D. et al. RydbergGPT. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 6, 045057 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tang, Y., Xiong, H., Yang, N., Xiao, T. & Yan, J. Towards LLM4QPE: unsupervised pretraining of quantum property estimation and a benchmark. In Proc. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201924) (OpenReview, 2024).<\/p>\n

Chen, A. & Heyl, M. Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient optimization. Nat. Phys. 20, 1476\u20131481 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rende, R. et al. Foundation neural-networks quantum states as a unified ansatz for multiple Hamiltonians. Nat. Commun. 16, 7213 (2025).\u00a0The first foundation neural-network quantum state: taking spin configurations and Hamiltonian couplings as multimodal inputs, and generalizing to Hamiltonians beyond training.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6840\u20136851 (Curran Associates, 2020).<\/p>\n

Song, Y. et al. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR \u201921) (OpenReview, 2021).<\/p>\n

Yang, L. et al. Diffusion models: a comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 1\u201339 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tang, Y., Long, M. & Yan, J. QuaDiM: a conditional diffusion model for quantum state property estimation. In Proc. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview, 2025).<\/p>\n

Dupuis, N. et al. Qiskit code assistant: training LLMs for generating quantum computing code. In Proc. 2024 IEEE LLM Aided Design Workshop (LAD) 1\u20134 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n

Yang, R., Wang, Z., Gu, Y., Liang, Y. & Li, T. QCircuitBench: a large-scale dataset for benchmarking quantum algorithm design. In Proc. The Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (OpenReview, 2026).<\/p>\n

Campbell, C., Chen, H. M., Luk, W. & Fan, H. Enhancing LLM-based quantum code generation with multi-agent optimization and quantum error correction. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2504.14557<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Liang, Z. et al. Unleashing the potential of LLMs for quantum computing: a study in quantum architecture design. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2307.08191<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Nakaji, K. et al. The generative quantum eigensolver (GQE) and its application for ground state search. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2401.09253<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Minami, S., Nakaji, K., Suzuki, Y., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Kadowaki, T. Generative quantum combinatorial optimization by means of a novel conditional generative quantum eigensolver. Digit. Discov. 4, 2229\u20132243 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhao, Y., Zhang, C. & Du, Y. Rethink the role of deep learning towards large-scale quantum systems. In Proc. Forty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML \u201925) (OpenReview, 2025).<\/p>\n

Wang, H. et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620, 47\u201360 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Romera-Paredes, B. et al. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature 625, 468\u2013475 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570\u2013578 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ataides, J., Gu, A., Yelin, S. F. & Lukin, M. D. Neural decoders for universal quantum algorithms. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2509.11370<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Ge, Y. et al. Quantum circuit synthesis and compilation optimization: overview and prospects. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2407.00736<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Wang, L. et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Front. Comput. Sci. 18, 186345 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J. & Lillicrap, T. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models. Nature 640, 647\u2013653 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baltru\u0161aitis, T., Ahuja, C. & Morency, L.-P. Multimodal machine learning: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 41, 423\u2013443 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Han, Z., Gao, C., Liu, J., Zhang, J. & Zhang, S. Q. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: a comprehensive survey. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2403.14608<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Bertoni, C. et al. Shallow shadows: expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 020602 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schuster, T., Haferkamp, J. & Huang, H.-Y. Random unitaries in extremely low depth. Science 389, 92\u201396 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hu, H.-Y. et al. Demonstration of robust and efficient quantum property learning with shallow shadows. Nat. Commun. 16, 2943 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sch\u00f6lkopf, B. & Smola, A. J. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization,Optimization, and Beyond (MIT Press, 2001).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Van Damme, J. et al. Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers. Nature 634, 74\u201379…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":126813,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,1633,617,164,63526],"class_list":["post-126812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-computer-science","tag-general","tag-physics","tag-quantum-information"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126812\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}