{"id":130298,"date":"2026-08-05T14:00:13","date_gmt":"2026-08-05T14:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/130298\/"},"modified":"2026-08-05T14:00:13","modified_gmt":"2026-08-05T14:00:13","slug":"a-25-year-old-ai-investors-hedge-fund-implodes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/130298\/","title":{"rendered":"A 25-Year-Old AI Investor\u2019s Hedge Fund Implodes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Situational Awareness collapsed from $45 billion to $10 billion in a matter of days\u2014a whopping 77% wipeout\u2014thanks to highly leveraged bets on volatile AI infrastructure stocks like Nebius, SanDisk and CoreWeave.<\/p>\n<p>Getty<\/p>\n<p>In June 2024, former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner went viral for a behemoth, 165-page essay titled \u201cSituational Awareness: The Decade Ahead,\u201d which predicted AI would become more powerful than humans. The 25-year-old decided to convert that foresightedness into fortune. Within months, he set up a hedge fund named for the essay to invest in public companies benefiting from the AI boom and prominent AI startups. Most investors were required to put in a minimum of $25 million into the fund, which drew backing from elite financial institutions like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, as well as billionaires like Stripe cofounders Patrick and John Collison, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/finance\/leopold-aschenbrenner-situational-awareness-ai-fund-597633d3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/finance\/leopold-aschenbrenner-situational-awareness-ai-fund-597633d3\" aria-label=\"Wall Street Journal\">Wall Street Journal<\/a> reported. The fund had turned hundreds of millions of dollars into $20 billion in assets by mid-2026. <\/p>\n<p>But by the end of July, investors got spooked by the amount of AI spending and markets had started to turn. The fund collapsed from $45 billion to $10 billion in a matter of days\u2014a whopping 77% wipeout\u2014thanks to highly leveraged bets on volatile AI infrastructure stocks like Nebius, SanDisk and CoreWeave. Billionaire <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/profile\/ken-griffin\/\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/profile\/ken-griffin\/\" target=\"_self\" aria-label=\"Ken Griffin\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Ken Griffin<\/a>\u2019s firm Citadel stepped in to bail out Aschenbrenner, buying up the bulk of its positions at a steep 10% discount, according to the WSJ report. By the end of the fire sale, Situational Awareness was left with a slimmed down portfolio of stocks and startups valued over $10 billion, including a significant stake in Anthropic. The sudden vaporization of the young AI investor\u2019s high-flying portfolio points to how a lack of risk management can burn a lot of money, very fast. <\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m always looking for ways to improve this newsletter. What is one thing you\u2019d love to see more or less of in The Prompt? I\u2019d love to hear from you at rshrivastava@forbes.com.<\/p>\n<p>Now let\u2019s get into the headlines. <\/p>\n<p>ETHICS + LAW<\/p>\n<p>Apple\u2019s lawsuit against OpenAI just got messier. In early July, the iPhone maker sued OpenAI and two of its former employees, accusing them of stealing trade secrets and retrieving confidential information after leaving. In a lengthy <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/siladityaray\/2026\/08\/04\/openai-shares-chats-and-emails-to-rebut-apples-suit-alleging-it-stole-trade-secrets\/\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/siladityaray\/2026\/08\/04\/openai-shares-chats-and-emails-to-rebut-apples-suit-alleging-it-stole-trade-secrets\/\" target=\"_self\" aria-label=\"response to the lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">response to the lawsuit<\/a>, OpenAI rejected Apple\u2019s claims, noting that its lawyers reached out to the wrong person after confusing two Asian last names, and one of the accused former employees accessed information only after Apple employees asked for his help in locating it. \u201cApple is one of the greatest companies of all time, and built a reputation for obsessing over the smallest details. This careless, aggressive and oddly personal lawsuit sadly doesn\u2019t live up to that reputation,\u201d the company wrote in a <a href=\"https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/apple-is-getting-this-wrong\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/apple-is-getting-this-wrong\/\" aria-label=\"blog\">blog<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>PEAK PERFORMANCE <\/p>\n<p>Chinese tech behemoth <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/tylerroush\/2026\/08\/03\/alibaba-unveils-qwen38-max-model-chinas-latest-ai-challenger-to-openai-and-anthropic\/\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/tylerroush\/2026\/08\/03\/alibaba-unveils-qwen38-max-model-chinas-latest-ai-challenger-to-openai-and-anthropic\/\" target=\"_self\" aria-label=\"Alibaba\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Alibaba<\/a> announced a new AI model Monday that it claims is on par with Anthropic\u2019s Fable and OpenAI\u2019s latest GPT models. The model, scheduled for release next week, is built for coding and other types of knowledge work. In an internal test, the model spent 16 days building and fixing up an AI coding tool. <\/p>\n<p>AI DEAL OF THE WEEK <\/p>\n<p>Flapping Airplanes, an AI startup that\u2019s researching new ways to train AI models using less data, is in talks to raise hundreds of millions of dollars at a $5 billion valuation, sources told <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/rashishrivastava\/2026\/07\/31\/ai-startup-flapping-airplanes-is-in-talks-to-raise-funding-at-a-5-billion-valuation\/\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/rashishrivastava\/2026\/07\/31\/ai-startup-flapping-airplanes-is-in-talks-to-raise-funding-at-a-5-billion-valuation\/\" target=\"_self\" aria-label=\"Forbes\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Forbes<\/a> last week. The company is among a growing number of so-called neolabs that have raised massive sums of money to carry out research instead of building and commercializing products. <\/p>\n<p>DEEP DIVE: Silicon Valley\u2019s Other China Problem: It\u2019s Training Their AI<\/p>\n<p>When U.S. sales teams from Silicon Valley\u2019s big data-labeling startups visited this year\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/icml.cc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/icml.cc\/\" aria-label=\"International Conference on Machine Learning\">International Conference on Machine Learning<\/a> in Seoul, Korea, they arrived prepped to court the industry\u2019s big spenders. The data companies\u2014collectively worth tens of billions of dollars and generating billions in annual revenue supplying training data to customers like OpenAI and Anthropic\u2014are used to chasing AI labs that are notoriously demanding, fickle and difficult to satisfy.<\/p>\n<p>They found another eager customer waiting for them: China\u2019s AI industry.<\/p>\n<p>Some Chinese companies have shopping lists. Tencent\u2014which has previously been designated by the U.S. government as associated with the Chinese military, a characterization the company disputes\u2014 circulated with prospective vendors a detailed request for training data spanning finance, cybersecurity and one of AI\u2019s most coveted research goals: AI systems capable of improving themselves.<\/p>\n<p>While the U.S. has long prohibited China from buying the chips that power America\u2019s top-tier AI models, it hasn\u2019t taken the same precautions with the data required to train them. This packaged human expertise, produced by specialist networks and shaped by task designs, grading rubrics and quality controls, is part of the expensive data infrastructure that teaches models to handle difficult professional tasks like financial modeling and coding. The business is worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually and it\u2019s helping Chinese AI models close the gap with their American rivals.<\/p>\n<p>Documentation and communications from buyers at Chinese AI labs and employees from top Silicon Valley data platforms such as Surge AI and Mercor reviewed by Forbes reveal a quiet multi-hundred-million-dollar trade in training datasets. The same U.S. startups serving as suppliers to OpenAI, Anthropic, and, in some cases, U.S. federal entities, are also supplying Beijing\u2019s top labs. Increasingly, Silicon Valley is training both sides of the AI arms race.<\/p>\n<p>Read the full story on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/annatong\/2026\/08\/05\/silicon-valleys-other-china-problem-its-training-their-ai\/\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/annatong\/2026\/08\/05\/silicon-valleys-other-china-problem-its-training-their-ai\/\" target=\"_self\" aria-label=\"Forbes\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Forbes<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>MODEL BEHAVIOR<\/p>\n<p>Job interviews typically require candidates to sit for multiple rounds of stress tests and personality assessments. But early AI startup LemonLime took its recruiting to the extreme: it offered attendees at a networking party the chance to interview if they got <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/lifestyle\/careers\/the-ai-startup-that-guaranteed-job-interviews-for-people-getting-a-tattoo-768d965b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/lifestyle\/careers\/the-ai-startup-that-guaranteed-job-interviews-for-people-getting-a-tattoo-768d965b\" aria-label=\"a permanent tattoo of the company logo.\">a permanent tattoo of the company logo.<\/a> Seven people took the offer. After the move sparked online backlash, founder and CEO Jordan Zietz publicly apologized and said that the idea was to \u201cmeet exceptional people, and find out which of them are just as crazy as we are.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Situational Awareness collapsed from $45 billion to $10 billion in a matter of days\u2014a whopping 77% wipeout\u2014thanks to&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":130299,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,19438,24078,12978,12053,1331,157,12052,733,1129],"class_list":["post-130298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-citadel","tag-collapse","tag-fund","tag-leopold-aschenbrenner","tag-market","tag-openai","tag-situational-awareness","tag-trading","tag-u-s"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130298\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/130299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}