{"id":133254,"date":"2026-08-07T20:50:15","date_gmt":"2026-08-07T20:50:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/133254\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T20:50:15","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T20:50:15","slug":"liberty-in-action-weekly-the-ai-future-is-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/133254\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberty in Action Weekly: The AI Future is Now"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Millions of Americans are already benefiting from artificial intelligence in countless ways at work and at home. Unfortunately the public debate overwhelmingly focuses on the transformative technology\u2019s costs. A new Goldwater Institute report seeks to restore balance and urges policymakers to not only recognize AI\u2019s promise, but to take steps to harness its value while managing its costs responsibly.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goldwaterinstitute.org\/policy-report\/harnessing-the-value-of-ai-at-home-and-in-the-workplace\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Harnessing the Value of AI at Home and in the Workplace<\/a>, Arizona State University economist Domenico Ferraro, PhD, says that AI \u201crepresents a once-in-a-generation technological opportunity,\u201d but its value is often difficult to quantify\u2014AI\u2019s benefits show up in the way people save time, learn new skills, and organize information. But many people see AI mainly as a threat to jobs, the electric grid, and the environment. Those concerns aren\u2019t imaginary and shouldn\u2019t be ignored, but AI\u2019s many benefits are likely to outweigh its costs.<\/p>\n<p>Policymakers must enable responsible AI deployment while helping workers and communities adapt to the changes it brings. That\u2019s why the Goldwater Institute recognizes that data centers\u2014the physical foundation of AI\u2014are essential infrastructure for the digital future that shouldn\u2019t be treated as burdens detached from their benefits.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.goldwaterinstitute.org\/what-ai-is-already-doing-for-ordinary-americans\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Read more here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a bedrock legal principle: the government can\u2019t discriminate against people based on their point of view. But that\u2019s exactly what a Wyoming school district is doing when it censors public speakers critical of district employees. That\u2019s why the Goldwater Institute is demanding the Sweetwater County School District #1 end its unconstitutional practice of viewpoint discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>Last fall, district leaders amended their public comment policy to prohibit discussions of employee \u201cperformance or employment.\u201d But enforcement has been one-sided\u2014the district has focused its enforcement against parents critical of school employees, not against parents praising those employees. That is viewpoint discrimination, and it\u2019s a violation of the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>District leaders are also violating the Wyoming Public Records Act by refusing to provide Goldwater with unredacted written public comments\u2014they wrongly claim that those records are confidential \u201cpersonnel files.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In letters to district leaders, the Goldwater Institute is demanding Sweetwater #1 leaders reverse course on their viewpoint discrimination practices and abide by the state\u2019s public records law. Citizens of Wyoming have a right to speak freely without fear of government censorship, and Goldwater will always be there to defend them.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.goldwaterinstitute.org\/wyoming-school-board-silences-critics-allows-praise-thats-unconstitutional\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Read more here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>When a state passes a law, that law typically doesn\u2019t apply beyond the state\u2019s borders\u2014and for good reason. State lawmakers may have a right to pass destructive laws, but they shouldn\u2019t also have the right to inflict damage on other states. That\u2019s why the Goldwater Institute filed a brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals urging the judges not to apply California\u2019s uniquely bad antitrust law to people who live elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>The case involves a class-action lawsuit targeting a vaping company accused of engaging in monopolistic practices. The company, Altria, stopped producing its own vaping products and instead purchased a competitor. The class of plaintiffs is trying to use California\u2019s uniquely bad antitrust law to sue Altria, even though the people suing the company live in a bunch of states and many of them never even bought an Altria product in California.<\/p>\n<p>The fact is, Altria had good reasons for its actions that have nothing to do with monopolies. And while the most important goal of federal antitrust law is to encourage competition, California\u2019s law has a far different aim\u2014protecting less competent and less diligent businesses against legitimate competition.<\/p>\n<p>As Goldwater argues, California\u2019s anti-trust legal theories aren\u2019t just anomalous, they\u2019re obsolete. And there\u2019s simply no justification for the court to apply them to people who don\u2019t even live in California.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.goldwaterinstitute.org\/californias-antitrust-laws-are-too-irrational-to-spread-to-other-states\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Read more here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u200b<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Millions of Americans are already benefiting from artificial intelligence in countless ways at work and at home. Unfortunately&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":133255,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,5103,25,12248,39,12526,66234,66235,66236,12378,66237],"class_list":["post-133254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-antitrust","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-censorship","tag-data-centers","tag-free-speech","tag-goldwater-institute","tag-sweetwater-county-school-district-1","tag-viewpoint-discrimination","tag-week-in-review","tag-wyoming-public-records-act"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133254\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/133255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}