{"id":138711,"date":"2026-08-13T13:19:06","date_gmt":"2026-08-13T13:19:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/138711\/"},"modified":"2026-08-13T13:19:06","modified_gmt":"2026-08-13T13:19:06","slug":"exploring-ais-operational-implications-in-a-future-u-s-china-conflict-initial-observations-from-the-campaign-wargame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/138711\/","title":{"rendered":"Exploring AI\u2019s Operational Implications in a Future U.S.-China Conflict: Initial Observations from the Camp(ai)gn Wargame"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>How might artificial intelligence (AI) change the way militaries plan and fight campaigns? RAND researchers developed Camp(ai)gn, an unclassified operational-level wargame, to explore that question. In this paper, the authors offer initial takeaways from ten iterations of Camp(ai)gn featuring a hypothetical 2035 U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan and played by more than 20 RAND researchers and affiliates.<\/p>\n<p>From these games, the authors developed six observations about how AI-enabled autonomous systems could affect campaign planning and execution. First, autonomous systems could enable new forms of limited conflict\u2014graduated, low-intensity operations fought primarily with robotic systems. Second, these limited conflicts could produce distinctive escalation dynamics and end states that differ from canonical visions of great-power wars. Third, autonomous mass could become especially important during protracted conflicts, potentially in ways that favor China. Fourth, autonomous mass could expand the commander\u2019s decision space and reshape familiar operational trade-offs, though it also increases the decisionmaking burden on commanders. Fifth, AI and autonomous systems could introduce new roles for allies\u2014in self-defense, direct combat participation, and coalition production. Sixth, attacking an adversary\u2019s data centers is unlikely to deliver decisive operational effects or prove to be an Achilles\u2019 heel for AI-enabled forces.<\/p>\n<p>The authors end by emphasizing that these observations reflect gameplay-generated hypotheses, not established conclusions, and they point toward specific lines of inquiry\u2014on force structure, countermeasures, allied integration, and defense industrial capacity\u2014that warrant further research.<\/p>\n<p>This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.<\/p>\n<p>This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rand.org\/pubs\/permissions.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">www.rand.org\/pubs\/permissions<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND&#8217;s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"How might artificial intelligence (AI) change the way militaries plan and fight campaigns? RAND researchers developed Camp(ai)gn, an&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":138712,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,68504,387,68502,390,68505,68503,214,68506,8403],"class_list":["post-138711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-autonomous-military-vehicles","tag-china","tag-military-strategy","tag-taiwan","tag-uncrewed-aerial-vehicles","tag-uncrewed-maritime-vessels","tag-united-states","tag-warfare-and-military-operations","tag-wargaming"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138711\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/138712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}