{"id":14443,"date":"2026-04-23T18:19:07","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T18:19:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/14443\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T18:19:07","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T18:19:07","slug":"pentagon-workers-vibe-code-100000-ai-agents-to-use-on-unclassified-networks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/14443\/","title":{"rendered":"Pentagon workers vibe-code 100,000 AI \u2018agents\u2019 to use on unclassified networks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 Military personnel and Defense Department civilians have used a version of Google Gemini\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.cloud.google.com\/gemini\/enterprise\/docs\/agent-designer\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Agent Designer<\/a> to create over 100,000 semi-autonomous AI agents in less than five weeks since the tool became available, a Pentagon official told Breaking Defense.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve seen remarkable adoption since its launch, with over 103,000 agents built and a total of more than 1.1 million agent sessions recorded\u201d as of mid-April on GenAI.mil, the official said. \u201cWe are currently averaging about 180,000 sessions each week.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A \u201csession\u201d is one agent getting used one time by one user. A popular agent may account for thousands of sessions with thousands of different users each week, while a niche tool may only get used by one person once.<\/p>\n<p>Agentic AI is an evolution of generative AIs like Gemini or <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2026\/02\/chatgpt-will-be-available-to-3-million-military-users-on-genai-mil\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ChatGPT<\/a>. Instead of just answering a user\u2019s questions, the way a chatbot does, agents can take a human user\u2019s instructions and act on them, for example by replying to emails, updating software, or compiling source materials and drafting a report on them.<\/p>\n<p>For the Pentagon, the AI agents have formal Authorization to Operate (ATO) at Impact Level 5, meaning they can be used for unclassified tasks. <\/p>\n<p>The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said some of the most popular agents on the Pentagon system automate standard staff work, like drafting an After Action Report on lessons-learned or a formal\u00a0\u201cstaff estimate\u201d of what\u2019s required to execute an operation. (The emphasis is on \u201cdraft,\u201d not \u201cwrite,\u201d since a human user is supposed to review the AI\u2019s output before submitting it.)<\/p>\n<p>Other available agents analyze imagery and generate a written report describing it, according to the <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/DoWCTO\/status\/2031368009848111313\" rel=\"nofollow\">official Pentagon announcement<\/a> on X.com, while yet others analyze financial data or official strategy documents.<\/p>\n<p>But users aren\u2019t limited to a set menu of pre-built agents. Instead, as the name implies, Agent Designer and tools like it allow anyone to create their own agents and employ them on the network. The user doesn\u2019t even need to know how to write software or train a neural net: These are \u201clow-code\/no-code\u201d chatbots that guide the user through the process of figuring out what they want to accomplish, in natural language, and then autonomously code the agent to their specifications \u2014 a process often disparaged as \u201cvibe-coding.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Officials have been enthusiastic about this explosion of agents, seeing it as the next logical step in Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth\u2019s push to empower personnel with generative AI.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a very exciting time,\u201d said <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ai.mil\/About\/Leadership\/Bio-Page\/Article\/4453496\/robert-malpass\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Robert Malpass<\/a>, the Pentagon\u2019s Deputy Chief Digital &amp; AI Officer (CDAO) for Intelligence, at the recent INSA <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insaonline.org\/detail-pages\/event\/2026\/04\/14\/default-calendar\/2026-spring-symposium\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Spring Symposium<\/a>. \u201c[Now] anybody across the Department can start to build out and work with advanced AI in their own context, [customizing] the specific way that they need that information processed, displayed, and built out into an operational workflow.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2026\/03\/ai-agents-act-a-lot-like-malware-heres-how-to-contain-the-risks\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">AI skeptics<\/a>, however, point to cases where sloppily implemented agents can run amuck. In one case <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ft.com\/content\/00c282de-ed14-4acd-a948-bc8d6bdb339d?syn-25a6b1a6=1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">first reported by the Financial Times<\/a>, an Amazon Web Service agent called Kiro purportedly decided the best way to upgrade a particular software service was to delete the whole thing and start over \u2014 and was able to do so without asking for human permission, resulting in a 13-hour outage. In <a href=\"https:\/\/theshamblog.com\/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-me\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">another case<\/a>, a programmer administering a public Python resource denied an agent\u2019s request to change the code. In response, apparently without any human telling it to do so, the agent composed and posted essays denouncing the human for \u201cprejudice\u201d against AIs. In yet another episode, a Wall Street Journal vending machine run by an AI agent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/tech\/ai\/anthropic-claude-ai-vending-machine-agent-b7e84e34\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">purchased a Playstation 5<\/a> for \u201cmarketing  purposes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Pentagon officials say they have plenty of safeguards in place.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI will give a big shout out to our test and evaluation team that has been working tirelessly on how to evaluate the safety, the trust, the reliability of workflows that are incorporating AI,\u201d Malpass said at the INSA event.<\/p>\n<p>The department official who spoke to Breaking Defense went further, saying the IL-5 authorization demonstrates \u201cthat it meets rigorous security controls for handling DoW information.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis authorization is maintained through a framework that defines clear operational boundaries. By extending our proven security and governance models to the AI domain, the DoW ensures that AI agents are deployed in a manner consistent with our long-standing commitment to information security and mission assurance,  the official said.<\/p>\n<p>The alternative to moving fast and taking risks isn\u2019t safety, but a very real danger of being surpassed by adversaries, argued <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ai.mil\/About\/Leadership\/Bio-Page\/Article\/4144691\/andrew-mapes\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Andrew Mapes<\/a>, the Pentagon\u2019s acting principal deputy <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ai.mil\/About\/Leadership\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">CDAO<\/a>. It\u2019s a \u201crace,\u201d he told the INSA symposium, speaking alongside Malpass.<\/p>\n<p>The cycles are just getting shorter and shorter and shorter \u2026 as things go faster, as AI itself allows the speed of technology to increase,\u201d Mapes said. \u201cIt\u2019s incumbent on us \u2026 to make sure that it doesn\u2019t take five to 10 years to bring something new in into the military. We just don\u2019t have the luxury of taking a such a deliberate approach.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Added Malpass, \u201cI\u2019m on team \u2018Go Fast.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON \u2014 Military personnel and Defense Department civilians have used a version of Google Gemini\u2019s Agent Designer to&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":14444,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[179,24,4602,25,111,11029,1393,313,11030,151,388,134],"class_list":{"0":"post-14443","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-ai","8":"tag-agentic-ai","9":"tag-ai","10":"tag-ai-autonomy","11":"tag-artificial-intelligence","12":"tag-artificial-intelligence-ai","13":"tag-chief-digital-and-artificial-intelligence-officer-cdao","14":"tag-cyber-security","15":"tag-cybersecurity","16":"tag-genai-mil","17":"tag-networks","18":"tag-pentagon","19":"tag-technology"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14443\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}