Elon Musk\u2019s testimony in the OpenAI lawsuit highlighted debates over AI model distillation, industry competition, and Open Ai\u2019s pivot from its non profit mission<\/p>\n
Third-party efforts to train new AI models by prompting publicly accessible chatbots and APIs is a process known as distillation. Chinese firms are often accused of using distillation to create models that are similarly capable to US offerings at a fraction of the cost. With toll of rising prices for computation power and competition in the sector, American labs have also begun using these techniques, as evidenced by Elon Musk\u2019s testimony during a legal case involving Sam Altman.<\/p>\n
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD<\/p>\n
Musk is currently testifying against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, alleging that they breached the company\u2019s original non-profit mission in favour of a for-profit structure. The trial began this week, with Musk\u2019s testimony concluding on Thursday.<\/p>\n
On Thursday the California court questioned Elon Musk on whether xAI had used distillation techniques on OpenAI models to train Grok, to which he responded that it was a general practice among AI companies. When asked if that meant \u201cyes,\u201d he replied, \u201cpartly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Savitt jasked Musk if his artificial intelligence company, xAI, had ever \u201cdistilled\u201d technology from OpenAI. Distillation is way of using one A.I. technology to create another, and it is not allowed by OpenAI\u2019s terms of service.<\/p>\n
\u201cGenerally A.I. companies distill other A.I. companies,\u201d Musk answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs that a \u2018yes\u2019?\u201d Savitt asked. Musk answered, \u201cPartly.\u201d<\/p>\n
The admission is notable, as distillation threatens AI giants by undermining the advantage these companies have built through heavy investment in compute infrastructure.<\/p>\n
To curb distillation, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google have launched initiatives through the Frontier Model Forum to share information on detecting and countering such practices. These systems involve systematically querying models to understand their inner workings. To prevent misuse, frontier labs are also working to block suspicious large-scale querying patterns.<\/p>\n
Highlights of Musk Testimony with William Savitt Open AI Lead Council<\/p>\n
William Savitt, OpenAI\u2019s lead counsel, asked Musk if he was aware that OpenAI\u2019s non-profit entity still existed and retained control over the for-profit company it created. Musk was also questioned by Microsoft\u2019s lead counsel, Russell Cohen, who highlighted Musk\u2019s awareness of the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft.<\/p>\n
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD<\/p>\n
Steven Molo later questioned Musk on why he did not file a lawsuit years earlier. Musk responded that he believed OpenAI would remain a \u201cpure-play 501(c)(3),\u201d referring to its non-profit status, which is why he did not act sooner.<\/p>\n
Musk\u2019s testimony ended on a lighter note, as Savitt continued questioning him. Musk remarked that Savitt was asking leading questions, prompting Judge Gonzalez Rogers to intervene: \u201cHe can lead. That\u2019s not how it works. Let\u2019s remind everyone in the courtroom that you\u2019re not a lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n
Musk, who has repeatedly described himself during the proceedings as a \u201chighly literal person,\u201d had the final word: \u201cI am not a lawyer. Well, technically I did take Law 101 in school.\u201d The courtroom reportedly laughed.<\/p>\n
As of now, Musk has been dismissed from the stand but may be recalled during the remaining weeks of the trial, with inputs from a New York Times report.<\/p>\n
First Published:
\nMay 01, 2026, 00:58 IST<\/p>\n
Home<\/a>Tech<\/a>Elon Musk acknowledges partial distillation of OpenAI models in xAI Grok trainingEnd of Article<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Elon Musk\u2019s testimony in the OpenAI lawsuit highlighted debates over AI model distillation, industry competition, and Open Ai\u2019s…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":23507,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[8872,2899],"class_list":{"0":"post-23506","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-xai","8":"tag-open-ai","9":"tag-xai"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23506\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}