taken issue<\/a> with the cross-examination by opposing attorney William Savitt, accusing him of asking misleading questions designed to trick him and the jury. At one point Thursday, Savitt asked Musk about earlier testimony where he said that as long as investor profits were capped, OpenAI wasn\u2019t in violation of agreements to keep it a nonprofit.<\/p>\n\u201cIt depends on how high the cap is,\u201d Musk replied. Savitt then said that \u201cwasn\u2019t your complete answer yesterday right?\u201d In response, Musk said \u201cfew answers are going to be complete, especially if you cut me off all the time.\u201d He added that if the cap is \u201csuper high,\u201d then OpenAI is \u201creally a for-profit at that point.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lawyers for OpenAI have rejected the allegations brought in Musk\u2019s civil lawsuit and said there were never promises that the company would remain a nonprofit forever. The company has argued Musk\u2019s legal challenge is aimed at undercutting OpenAI\u2019s rapid growth and bolstering Musk\u2019s xAI, which he launched in 2023 as a competitor.<\/p>\n
The trial in federal court in Oakland, California, is scheduled to continue through late May. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers excused Musk from the witness stand Thursday, but he may be called back later.<\/p>\n
During the cross-examination, Savitt also asked Musk about his companies \u2014 Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink and X \u2014 and whether they were all for-profit. Musk replied yes, and affirmed that be believes all of these companies are \u201csocially beneficial.\u201d<\/p>\n
Savitt then asked why Musk hasn\u2019t started a nonprofit himself, eight years after he left OpenAI.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought I had started a nonprofit with OpenAI but they stole it,\u201d Musk replied, adding that this is \u201cthe entire basis of this lawsuit.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By BARBARA ORTUTAY OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) \u2014 Elon Musk on Thursday sparred with an attorney for OpenAI during…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24238,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[580,140,10991,6964,2232,157,370,12737],"class_list":{"0":"post-24237","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-openai","8":"tag-chatgpt","9":"tag-elon-musk","10":"tag-for-profit","11":"tag-lawsuit","12":"tag-nonprofit","13":"tag-openai","14":"tag-sam-altman","15":"tag-trial"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24237\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}