{"id":26462,"date":"2026-05-04T09:42:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T09:42:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/26462\/"},"modified":"2026-05-04T09:42:08","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T09:42:08","slug":"ct-adding-artificial-intelligence-regulations-heres-what-they-do","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/26462\/","title":{"rendered":"CT adding artificial intelligence regulations. Here&#8217;s what they do"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Looking to the future of technology, <a href=\"http:\/\/cga.ct.gov\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">state lawmakers<\/a> granted final legislative approval on a key bill regulating artificial intelligence in an attempt to protect children and consumers without stifling one of the nation\u2019s fastest-growing industries.<\/p>\n<p>The bill, lawmakers said, will establish Connecticut as a national leader in oversight of a major industry that involves billions of dollars and is a large driver on the stock market. The legislation creates a regulatory framework at the same time that lawmakers say they want businesses to capitalize on the technological revolution.<\/p>\n<p>After more than 2 1\/2 hours of debate, the state House of Representatives voted 131-17 last week with all negative votes cast by Republicans. The Senate had previously approved the bill by 32-4 with Republican Senss Rob Sampson of Wolcott, Tony Hwang of Fairfield, Eric Berthel of Watertown, and Ryan Fazio of Greenwich against the measure.<\/p>\n<p>The legislative compromise marks a sharp change from recent years when Gov. Ned Lamont threatened to veto previous bills because he feared that too much regulation would hinder growth of the industry and prevent high-technology companies from growing in Connecticut or moving to the state.<\/p>\n<p>Lamont\u2019s new spokeswoman, Cathryn Vaulman, said that Lamont favors the bill with \u201ccommonsense protections\u201d and will sign it into law.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGovernor Lamont made it a priority this session to fight for protections for Connecticut residents \u2014 especially children \u2014 from serious threats posed by emerging technology,\u201d she said. \u201cParents should be in control of aspects of social media and AI that carry real risks for children\u2019s mental health. Workers should be able to benefit from greater efficiency on the job without fearing discrimination or displacement by AI.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Known as<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cga.ct.gov\/asp\/cgabillstatus\/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&amp;which_year=2026&amp;bill_num=5\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> Senate Bill 5<\/a>, the wide-ranging, 71-page bill would create oversight committees, adopt workforce development programs and attempt to prevent AI from discriminating in hiring and sorting through resumes in the employment process. Connecticut small businesses would not be held liable if a third-party vendor in the hiring process uses AI, lawmakers said.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Hubert Delany, a Stamford Democrat who co-chairs the legislature\u2019s AI caucus with Sen. James Maroney of Milford, said the final bill was written after \u201cyears of hard work\u201d on technology that is \u201cperhaps the most powerful and transformative of our generation\u201d and will continue changing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRight now, without standards and guidelines \u2026 consumers have little guidance or trust with this technology,\u201d Delany said. \u201cCould you imagine flight without traffic control? \u2026 This legislation builds highways to progress. \u2026 The horse is artificial intelligence, and it is high time that we hitched the cart to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Roland LeMar, a New Haven Democrat who co-chairs the general law committee that oversees AI, said that the legislature will continue looking at AI as the technology evolves.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe will support innovation and business growth,\u201d LeMar said. \u201cWe have the opportunity to lead \u2014 not follow \u2014 on the defining technology of our time. We need to act now. \u2026 It ensures that AI works for people, not against them. \u2026 We\u2019ll be talking about AI and regulatory structures for the rest of our lives.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Dave Rutigliano, a Trumbull Republican who serves as the ranking member on the general law committee, said lawmakers took pains to strike a delicate balance.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re trying to walk a fine line between consumer protection, protecting our young people and not stifling innovation and industry,\u201d Rutigliano said on the House floor. \u201cIt\u2019s illegal for AI to discriminate\u201d in hiring and employment practices.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, Rutigliano said the legislation is \u201ca good first step\u201d that will help consumers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe time has come,\u201d Rutigliano said. \u201cWe\u2019re not stifling innovation. \u2026 Let\u2019s be clear. If you\u2019re using chatbot and it\u2019s telling you to do things that aren\u2019t right, it shouldn\u2019t be doing that. \u2026 I think it\u2019s OK for us to start a regulatory environment. \u2026 It\u2019s certainly not perfect, but it is a start.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Al reflecting human activity<\/p>\n<p>Artificial intelligence has improved to the point where consumers sometimes do not know whether they are speaking to a real human being when they call an 800 number for customer service.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, a nonpartisan bill summary states that companies must \u201cprevent the AI companion from claiming to be a human being, including when a user asks the companion if it is a human being, or generating outputs that refute or conflict with any disclosure that the companion is not a human being.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the same way, minors and others sometimes develop interaction with an \u201cAI companion,\u201d that often responds in the same way as a human. The companion not only provides human-like responses but \u201ccan sustain a relationship across multiple interactions,\u201d a bill summary states.<\/p>\n<p>The companion must use \u201cevidence-based methods to detect any user expression clearly showing a risk of suicide, self-harm, or imminent physical violence, and implement prevention measures to prevent the AI companion from generating output that encourages this behavior,\u201d the summary states. \u201cIf the companion detects any of these expressions, it must refer the user to appropriate mental health evaluation and treatment resources, including the 9-8-8 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Bill Buckbee, a New Milford Republican, said AI companions can be helpful for senior citizens \u201cwho are alone and need somebody to talk to.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The bill also allows state Attorney General William Tong to provide more oversight regarding AI since his office primarily enforces the law.<\/p>\n<p>Tong\u2019s office said that the bill \u201crequires chat bot operators to adopt protocols to detect self-harm, to provide notices that users are communicating with an AI companion, and to require chat bot operators to prohibit access to minors if the program is capable of encouraging self-harm and offering mental health services, among other provisions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The bill also requires \u201cdisclosure requirements related to use of automated decision technology in employment decisions, requires that state notifications given prior to mass layoffs and plant closings note when such actions are related to use of AI or other technology, and requires the state to study and develop a plan to address AI-related employment impacts, among other provisions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Concerns about jobs<\/p>\n<p>A major concern about AI is how it will impact the workforce.<\/p>\n<p>Many predictions have been made, for example, that there will be a reduced need for paralegals to conduct legal research and fewer radiologists because AI can read X-rays and MRIs. But radiologists are still employed because some insurance companies will refuse to pay claims unless they are overseen by radiologists and cannot be done exclusively by AI, officials said.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, AI has generated legal briefs that cited incorrect legal cases that ended up in court.<\/p>\n<p>Lamont\u2019s office says that AI is \u201ctransforming workplaces across Connecticut and the nation\u201d as the demand for skills in the field is increasing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSince August 2024, nearly 11,000 job postings have required AI skills \u2013 a 40% increase from the year prior,\u201d Lamont\u2019s office said earlier this year. \u201cToday,\u00a0one in 52 jobs in the state list AI skill requirements, up from one in 70 a year ago. The demand is even stronger in roles requiring an associate or bachelor\u2019s degree, where one in 23 jobs now call for AI expertise, spanning nearly every industry and occupation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Floor debate<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Gary Turco, a Newington Democrat who is among the legislature\u2019s leading authorities on artificial intelligence, handled much of the questions regarding the bill on the House floor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAI is rapidly growing,\u201d Turco said. \u201cThis is the wave of the future.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With some consumers increasingly trying to get their medical information on the internet, Turco said the bill provides safeguards for physical and mental health.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe platform has to tell them that they are not a licensed medical professional,\u201d Turco said. \u201cThere are very strict restrictions in this bill.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On a highly complicated issue with detailed explanations, lawmakers said they sometimes needed to explain the bill at \u201cthe fourth grade level\u201d so that newcomers to the issue could understand it.<\/p>\n<p>Lawmakers said that AI will be incorporated into the curriculum in computer science classes.<\/p>\n<p>Seeking to protect children, the bill says that chatbots \u201ccannot encourage any romantic\u201d interactions in a measure that can be enforced by the state attorney general, lawmakers said.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Geraldo Reyes, a Waterbury Democrat who supported the bill, said he wants to make sure that young people are protected.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI consider myself a complete dinosaur when it comes to AI,\u201d Reyes said. \u201cI can tell by the way my grandchildren interact with me with AI.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Rep. Thomas O\u2019Dea, a New Canaan Republican, said he has concerns about the impact on the workforce.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLook, AI frankly petrifies me,\u201d O\u2019Dea said.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Joe Hoxha, a Bristol Republican, said, \u201cI\u2019m not sure that those who created this modern-day Frankenstein know how to control it. \u2026 This is really a new frontier. \u2026 Sometimes fiction is a lot closer to reality than we might think. \u2026 This monster that we humans have created will take us over one day if we do not get it under control.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Tina Courpas, a Greenwich Republican, said she was concerned that the bill\u00a0\u201crestrains innovation,\u201d but she was open-minded to learn more about AI.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Christie Carpino, a Cromwell Republican, said, \u201cAI is already here. It\u2019s not coming. \u2026 It\u2019s not going to protect our residents if I vote no. \u2026 Chatbots scare me when they interact with unsophisticated residents. \u2026 Do I think the federal government \u2014 I can\u2019t believe I\u2019m saying this \u2014 should take some action? I do. \u2026 If we do nothing, it is a disservice to the people we represent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Deepfakes<\/p>\n<p>For years, the artificial intelligence bill had a key provision regarding \u201cdeepfake porn\u201d that involves creating videos or photographs \u2014 often of famous people \u2014 that would show their recognizable head but attached to another\u2019s body in compromising positions. The deepfake porn provisions were not passed into law when the overall AI bill was shelved for the year.<\/p>\n<p>In this session, deepfakes were placed separately in House Bill 5312, which was known as the \u201cTake It Down Act.\u201d The measure allows civil lawsuits by the state attorney general, as well a private right of action that allows Connecticut residents to sue if they are \u201cvictims of unlawful dissemination of a synthetically created intimate image.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The bill passed by 148-0 with three members absent in the House.<\/p>\n<p>Long history in CT<\/p>\n<p>Concerns about artificial intelligence have a long history.<\/p>\n<p>In 2007, famed actor Paul Newman of Westport traveled to the state Capitol complex in Hartford and testified to the judiciary committee for a bill that would have prevented the unauthorized digital distortion of anyone\u2019s image and create \u201ca right of publicity\u201d in the digital age. Newman was way ahead of his time 19 years ago, and he told lawmakers that technology had improved so quickly that he feared that film clips from his performances could be digitally extracted for use in other films or commercials. Newman, a Hollywood giant, died in 2008 at the age of 83.<\/p>\n<p>The unauthorized use of images was not difficult to accomplish and could be done by \u201cthe average guy in the basement,\u201d Newman told The Courant in an interview after his testimony.<\/p>\n<p>The 2007 bill, which did not pass, would have prevented any distortion that would \u201ccause the individual to speak or appear to speak words that the person did not speak or place the individual or appear to place the individual in a place or circumstance in which the individual did not agree to be placed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The current technology has gone far beyond the 1994 classic film \u201cForrest Gump,\u201d in which lead actor Tom Hanks\u2019 character appeared in scenes shot decades earlier, meeting with President Lyndon Johnson and appearing with former Beatle John Lennon on The Dick Cavett Show. But both Cavett and Lennon\u2019s widow, Yoko Ono, gave permission for the latter scene, officials said.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"Longtime Connecticut resident Paul Newman was ahead of his time in raising concerns about the potential manipulation of video in a way that is common now with artificial intelligence. Newman is shown here campaigning for Sen. Eugene McCarthy in 1968. The photo appears in the HBO documentary &quot;The Last Movie Stars.&quot; Newman, who is shown with film critic Roger Ebert, died in 2008 at his Westport home at the age of 83.\" width=\"1200\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/NDOVWRPZABGL7BVYURZAKXTVEU.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"1136526\" \/><\/p>\n<p>KEITH RUSSELL \/ HANDOUT<\/p>\n<p>Longtime Connecticut resident Paul Newman was ahead of his time in raising concerns about the potential manipulation of video in a way that is common now with artificial intelligence. Newman is shown here campaigning for Sen. Eugene McCarthy in 1968. The photo appears in the HBO documentary &#8220;The Last Movie Stars.&#8221; Newman, who is shown with film critic Roger Ebert, died in 2008 at his Westport home at the age of 83.<\/p>\n<p>Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@courant.com\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Looking to the future of technology, state lawmakers granted final legislative approval on a key bill regulating artificial&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":26463,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,17691,17692,17685,14619,17689,7065,17694,17690,1420,774,17688,17684,17693,17683,17686,17682,17687,134,17695],"class_list":["post-26462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-cathryn-vaulman","tag-chief-spokeswoman","tag-computer-technology","tag-connecticut","tag-connecticut-news","tag-ct-news","tag-dick-cavett-show","tag-hartford-courant-gov-ned-lamont","tag-john-lennon","tag-local-news","tag-max-image-preview","tag-national-leader","tag-paul-newman","tag-protect-children","tag-regulatory-framework","tag-state-lawmakers","tag-technological-revolution","tag-technology","tag-tom-hanks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26462\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}