{"id":32314,"date":"2026-05-08T14:25:10","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T14:25:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/32314\/"},"modified":"2026-05-08T14:25:10","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T14:25:10","slug":"whats-the-role-of-a-simple-fitness-band-in-the-ai-health-era","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/32314\/","title":{"rendered":"What\u2019s the role of a simple fitness band in the AI health era?"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is Optimizer<\/a>, a weekly newsletter sent every Friday from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song<\/a> that dissects and discusses the latest gizmos and potions that swear they\u2019re going to change your life. Opt in for Optimizer here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A fitness band is for bettering yourself, but casually. It\u2019s lightweight, easy to wear, and not something you have to think too hard about. It\u2019s cheaper than a smartwatch. You get your steps, basic heart rate, and some sleep tracking. Maybe you can see the time, maybe you can\u2019t. But unlike many wearables today, a fitness tracker wasn\u2019t truly meant to be a companion for your phone and all the overwhelm that comes with it. It was a simple tool with a simple purpose: to make you move more.<\/p>\n

Ten years ago, nobody was better at this than Fitbit.<\/p>\n

For a time, it was the Kleenex or Band-Aid of wearables \u2014 a brand so ubiquitous that it was synonymous with an entire product category. Your mom probably doesn\u2019t remember a Jawbone, FuelBand, or a Mio Slice. But for a while, everybody called a fitness band a Fitbit.<\/p>\n

But Fitbit hasn\u2019t been quite the same since Google acquired the company<\/a> in 2021.<\/p>\n

The distinction between Fitbit and Google products has been murky ever since. In many ways, it echoed how Google handled acquiring Nest. At first, the two felt like relatively separate entities. Then, slowly over the years, users were encouraged to migrate accounts from Nest to Google. Products were first rebranded as Nest by Google, then Google Nest. The Nest app is still available, but it\u2019s in maintenance mode. It works with older products, but you can\u2019t pair it with new ones.<\/p>\n

\"Person<\/a><\/p>\n

The Charge 6 in 2023 was the last Fitbit hardware before the Air earlier this week. (I\u2019m not counting the Ace LTE since it was for kids.) Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales \/ The Verge<\/p>\n

The Nest-ification of Fitbit has differences \u2014 for example, there was a particular rough patch where Fitbit suffered several major server outages, and users were enraged when Google started sunsetting beloved social features. (2023 was a tough transition year<\/a>.) But one of the most confusing aspects was the product lineup. When the Google Pixel Watch debuted in 2022, it was alongside a new Fitbit Versa 4 and a Fitbit Sense 2<\/a>. That\u2019s three smartwatches total, with the two Fitbit watches having nerfed features. Differentiating them all was a headscratcher. The Fitbit Charge 6<\/a> followed a year later, and there has been radio silence until the Fitbit Air announcement earlier this week. (I don\u2019t really count the Ace LTE<\/a> \u2014 that was for kids.)<\/p>\n

In the meantime, Fitbit became Fitbit by Google. Users are being encouraged to migrate their Fitbit accounts<\/a> to Google accounts. The Air is the Google Fitbit Air now. And on May 19th, the Fitbit app will be no more. The green-and-white Fitbit icon will be replaced by a multicolored heart icon for Google Health.<\/p>\n

\u201cFitbit\u2019s DNA is a great tracker \u2014 an accessible tracker that everyone can go and use,\u201d explains Rishi Chandra, Google\u2019s vice president of health and home. \u201cOne question I get is, \u2018Well, why did it take so long to launch new hardware?\u2019 The truth is, we didn\u2019t want to launch just another tracker.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hence why Google bundled it with its Google Health Coach and Health app announcement. Sure! But why not just call the Air a Pixel Band and be done with it?<\/p>\n

\u201cPixel is Android-only,\u201d Chandra says bluntly. \u201cIt\u2019s targeted to really make sure we can build the most high-end, highest-quality wearable technology with the latest sensors possible for that user base. Fitbit is designed to work with every iOS and Android phone from the get-go.\u201d<\/p>\n

Chandra adds that Google views these as two very different segments and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Fitbits are the entry-level, simple software for the everyman. Pixel Watches are the premium, Android-only counterpart. But, everywhere else, whatever remains of the old Fitbit has essentially been absorbed into the larger Google machine.<\/p>\n

Again, this has been a long time coming. But it\u2019s also a bittersweet denouement for what was the iconic wearable brand.<\/p>\n

Fitbit\u2019s struggles didn\u2019t start with the Google acquisition. By 2021, Fitbit was squeezed. It hadn\u2019t managed to successfully figure out a killer smartwatch, outshone by Apple, Samsung, and even Garmin in that arena. And at that time, smartwatches were where all the exciting stuff was happening as far as health tech features. In the tracker space, cheaper Chinese knockoffs undercut Fitbit\u2019s prices while offering much of the same basic tracking capabilities.<\/p>\n

In 2026, it\u2019s a bit of a different story. Increasingly, I hear from readers that they\u2019re tired of the smartwatch<\/a>. Screenless devices like Whoop and Oura are inspiring dupes left and right. And even as screentime increases, people lament left and right that they\u2019d like less overstimulation from a barrage of notifications and pinging. At the same time, wearable companies are zeroing in on comfort because as AI becomes increasingly stuffed into these devices, it\u2019s imperative that people actually wear them with as few breaks as possible. (After all, part of a wearable\u2019s draw is that it allows companies to learn about you 24\/7<\/a>.) So it makes sense that Google\u2019s decided to return to Fitbit\u2019s roots with a simpler, affordable fitness band.<\/p>\n

\"Person<\/a><\/p>\n

I had a Charge 3 back in the day too, even if the whole button thing drove me nuts. Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales \/ The Verge<\/p>\n

But the Fitbit Air isn\u2019t truly a resurgence on its own. Chandra emphasized to me that it\u2019s a one-two punch with the Google Health Coach. AI in fitness trackers has always been there in the form of algorithms and machine learning to crunch data. But generative AI in fitness trackers \u2014 these \u201ccoaches\u201d that deliver insight \u2014 arrived long after Fitbit started playing second fiddle to the Pixel Watch.<\/p>\n

Part of the pitch is simplicity. Do you have data overload with the forty bazillion metrics and biomarkers you now have to keep track of? Well, here\u2019s AI to parse that all for you and deliver personalized health. You can now take control of your own health! These were all points Chandra highlighted as well. That, and fragmented health data storage, is a fundamental problem in the health tech space. I can\u2019t argue with Google\u2019s health game plan on paper. The thing I want to gently challenge, however, is the concept of AI making any of this as simple as what an old-school Fitbit used to be.<\/p>\n

In 2015, a Fitbit Charge HR was my very first tracker. Eventually, I graduated to the Alta HR, and for many years, some kind of Fitbit was my daily driver. A Fitbit was what helped me get a polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis<\/a> after two years of being baffled by my data. It documented some monumentally weird moments in my life \u2014 like when I got a call from the FBI<\/a> or got stampeded at a movie theater<\/a> during a false alarm for a shooting. In the case of the latter, the massive spike in heart rate in my Fitbit data was the only real proof that false alarm had happened.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a><\/p>\n

The Sense 2 along with the Versa 4 was the epitome of the Google-Fitbit transition\u2019s messy early stages. Photo by Victoria Song \/ The Verge<\/p>\n

In many moments, I was a bit of a data detective. It was tedious. I always had to cross-reference dates and biometric data with my analog journal entries. Ten years ago, I think I would\u2019ve been more open to the deluge of logging features and tags that I\u2019ve since come to resent. But looking back, I wonder how Google Health Coach would interpret something like a moment of sheer terror? Would I get a tone-deaf morning summary the next day, advising me to get checked out by a doctor? Would I have to explain the stresses of my life in order to get that personalized context? This was never an issue with the old Fitbit. Even as I appreciate how advanced this category has become, how health features are genuinely lifesaving, there is a part of me that longs for how it was. A simple, sometimes tedious, bare minimum.<\/p>\n

I know I\u2019m not alone there. Google knows too. When I spoke to Chandra about the Air<\/a>, he told me that its main purpose was to serve the many people who find wearables too bulky, complicated, and expensive. But what I think he\u2019s getting at is the wearable overwhelm. The data fatigue. And while I can get behind the theory of AI making data insights easier to find, my lived experience thus far has told me it creates a different kind of exasperation. We might be seeing a resurgence in simple hardware, but the software, the metrics, and the sheer amount of data collected are a whole new ballpark.<\/p>\n

In the hours since the Air was announced, I\u2019ve had plenty of friends, peers, and colleagues reaching out to me for my opinion. Many of them are asking because they\u2019re over all the bells and whistles a smartwatch promises. They\u2019d like to opt out of data fatigue, and maybe a familiar Fitbit is just the trick. First off, I never comment on my final opinion before testing is done. But speaking as a onetime Fitbit diehard? A return to the old Fitbit isn\u2019t what\u2019s being offered here. This is something new. I\u2019m not exactly sure what that is yet. What I do know is that type of tracker is long gone.<\/p>\n

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.Victoria SongClose\"Victoria<\/p>\n

Victoria Song<\/p>\n

Senior Reviewer, Wearable Tech<\/p>\n

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All by Victoria Song<\/a><\/p>\n

ColumnClose<\/p>\n

Column<\/p>\n

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All Column<\/a><\/p>\n

FitnessClose<\/p>\n

Fitness<\/p>\n

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All Fitness<\/a><\/p>\n

GadgetsClose<\/p>\n

Gadgets<\/p>\n

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All Gadgets<\/a><\/p>\n

OptimizerClose<\/p>\n

Optimizer<\/p>\n

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All Optimizer<\/a><\/p>\n

TechClose<\/p>\n

Tech<\/p>\n

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All Tech<\/a><\/p>\n

WearableClose<\/p>\n

Wearable<\/p>\n

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.<\/p>\n

FollowFollow<\/p>\n

See All Wearable<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This is Optimizer, a weekly newsletter sent every Friday from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song that dissects and…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":32315,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,3330,2264,3033,20722,781,20090],"class_list":["post-32314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-column","tag-fitness","tag-gadgets","tag-optimizer","tag-tech","tag-wearable"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32314"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32314\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32315"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}