artificial intelligence<\/a> at the forefront of talks this week with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, a first that highlights the technology’s strategic heft but substantive commitments are unlikely, said two U.S. officials with knowledge of preparations.<\/p>\nTrump’s Beijing visit unfolds as the \u200cU.S.-China AI rivalry intensifies into a contest some observers have compared to a Cold War-style nuclear arms race. Pressure to engage has grown after Claude maker Anthropic’s launch \u200cof the powerful Mythos model, analysts say, raising the stakes for both sides.<\/p>\n
China was excluded from early access to a Mythos preview, raising concerns the technology could be exploited by bad actors to penetrate Chinese software and financial \u200bsystems.<\/p>\n
However, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and top White House tech policy advisor Michael Kratsios are joining Trump’s delegation, suggesting that more substantive conversations on AI and Nvidia’s powerful H200 chips could be on the summit agenda.<\/p>\n
China has also floated to the U.S. a formal mechanism for AI dialogue led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese vice finance minister Liao Min, according to one source briefed on China’s outreach. The Wall Street Journal first reported on the dialogue last week.<\/p>\n
But expectations are low since both agencies do not specialise in AI and the Trump administration has only recently shifted towards \u200cpursuing safety vetting for advanced AI models.<\/p>\n
AI CHANNEL OF COMMUNICATION NEEDED \u2060AS STAKES RISE<\/p>\n
White House officials acknowledged cutting-edge AI systems like Mythos made a “channel of communication” with China essential to avoid conflicts arising from their deployment.<\/p>\n
Market intelligence firm IDC China warns that shutting Chinese companies out of Mythos risks deepening a “generational gap” in AI defence capabilities between China and the \u2060West.<\/p>\n
Anthropic said last month Mythos had found “thousands” of major vulnerabilities in operating systems and other software, triggering a scramble by banks and governments worldwide to shore up their cybersecurity defences.<\/p>\n
Washington has struck guardrails on advanced tech with Beijing before, on nuclear proliferation, and in 2024 both sides agreed that humans, not AI, must control nuclear-use decisions.<\/p>\n
Now researchers warn the stakes are rising: advanced AI could accelerate bioweapons design, trigger \u200bfinancial \u200bshocks, supercharge cyber and disinformation campaigns, and even slip beyond human control to “rogue” systems acting on their own.<\/p>\n
Both \u200bsides could set up a no-blame hotline to flag suspected AI-driven incidents, \u200csaid Kwan Yee Ng, head of international AI governance at Beijing-based AI safety consultancy Concordia AI.<\/p>\n
“Getting senior Western figures to engage directly with China (on AI) has become increasingly difficult, though a positive signal from the Xi-Trump summit could change that.”<\/p>\n
A military hotline already exists, but U.S. officials have complained that China has often not picked up.<\/p>\n
Other analysts suggest establishing guardrails for frontier AI models or committing to reduce AI-enabled malicious activity, similar to the 2015 U.S.-China Cybersecurity Agreement.<\/p>\n
“China likely hopes the U.S. will appropriately distinguish between AI governance and technological containment,” said Sun Chenghao of Tsinghua University, who has participated in U.S.-China unofficial Track II AI talks.<\/p>\n
COMMON GROUND PROVES ELUSIVE<\/p>\n
Amid growing rivalry in the AI race, U.S. lawmakers are pushing sweeping new limits on China’s access to \u200csemiconductor supply chains, even as the Trump administration eases some curbs on advanced chip exports to China.<\/p>\n
The MATCH \u200bAct has drawn protests from Beijing and could surface in summit discussions, in addition to existing U.S. chip \u200bexport controls, said three sources familiar with the matter.<\/p>\n
“This is a really crucial window \u200bfor Beijing to act and try to get the U.S. to commit to shutting it down,” said Reva Goujon, geopolitical strategist at Rhodium Group.<\/p>\n
While Chinese \u200cAI firms like DeepSeek increasingly tout their reliance on domestic chips, U.S. \u200bcurbs on chip equipment sales continue to choke \u200bBeijing’s push for self-sufficiency just when domestic fabs are struggling to scale output. Computing power shortages have forced many Chinese AI models to ration user access in recent months.<\/p>\n
Tensions are also escalating on another front: the White House has accused China of industrial-scale theft of U.S. AI labs’ intellectual property.<\/p>\n
In a pointed article last week, the Communist \u200bParty’s flagship journal warned that Western AI measures have moved beyond \u200ctargeted restrictions to what it called a “systematic ecosystem blockade” against China.<\/p>\n
“When one side sees AI as a proliferation risk to be contained and the other sees containment \u200bas an attack on a general-purpose technology, that makes it really difficult to find common ground,” said Ng.<\/p>\n
(Reporting by Laurie Chen; Additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt \u200bin Washington, Fanny Potkin and Ben Blanchard in Taipei; Editing by Miyoung Kim and Shri Navaratnam)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By Laurie Chen BEIJING, May 13 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump will put artificial intelligence at the…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":37244,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,25,2699,387,625,10890,4862,1671],"class_list":["post-37243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-beijing","tag-china","tag-donald-trump","tag-operating-systems","tag-white-house","tag-xi-jinping"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37243"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37243\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}